Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/029,838

PARKING ASSISTANCE APPARATUS AND METHOD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 17, 2025
Examiner
HUNTER, MISHAWN N
Art Unit
2484
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Hyundai Mobis Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
766 granted / 982 resolved
+20.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
1004
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.6%
-29.4% vs TC avg
§103
45.6%
+5.6% vs TC avg
§102
30.0%
-10.0% vs TC avg
§112
11.0%
-29.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 982 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Lee et al. (US Pub. No. 2017/0054946). Consider claim 1. Lee et al. discloses the parking assistance apparatus (para. 0050 describes assisting a user in driving) comprising: a display unit (para. 0051 describes a display device); a camera configured to capture an image from surroundings of a vehicle (para. 0065 describes a camera that captures images of views around a vehicle); a traveling signal input unit configured to input a traveling signal of the vehicle (paras. 0129-0131 describe receiving sensor information); and a processor configured to generate a surround view monitor (SVM) image based on the image captured by the camera (para. 0007 describes a processor is configured to, based on the captured image of the view around the vehicle, fix a view point for the around-view monitor function), to fix the SVM image to one viewpoint centered on a preset parking space, and to move a vehicle model within the SVM image with the viewpoint fixed (paras. 0172, 0173, and 0188 describe fixing the SVM image to one viewpoint centered on a preset parking space, and to move a vehicle model within the SVM image with the viewpoint fixed). Consider claim 2. Lee et al. discloses the parking assistance apparatus according to the parking assistance apparatus according to wherein the processor analyzes the SVM image to recognize parking space candidates (para. 0015 describes detecting a parking space in a vicinity of the vehicle), and receives a user's selection of any one of the recognized parking space candidates (para. 0019 describes detecting, from the fixed around-view monitor image, an input for selecting a parking space). Consider claim 3. Lee et al. discloses the parking assistance apparatus according to the parking assistance apparatus according to wherein the processor displays the parking space candidate within the SVM image and receives the user's selection of the parking space candidate (para. 0019 describes detecting, from the fixed around-view monitor image, an input for selecting a parking space) by touch via the display unit (para. 0118 describes a touch input unit). Consider claim 4. Lee et al. discloses the parking assistance apparatus according to the parking assistance apparatus according to wherein the processor places the parking space candidate at a bottom center of the SVM image with the viewpoint fixed (figs. 15-18 show the parking space candidate at a bottom center of the SVM image with the viewpoint fixed). Consider claim 5. Lee et al. discloses the parking assistance apparatus according to the parking assistance apparatus according to wherein the processor moves the vehicle model according to an actual traveling signal of the vehicle within the SVM image with the viewpoint fixed (paras. 0129-0131 describe receiving sensor information of the vehicle within the SVM image with the fixed viewpoint). Consider claim 6. Lee et al. discloses the parking assistance apparatus according to the parking assistance apparatus according to wherein the traveling signal comprises at least one of a shift stage signal, a wheel signal, and a steering angle signal of the vehicle (para. 0131 describes a steering sensor by steering wheel rotation). Consider claim 7. Lee et al. discloses the parking assistance apparatus according to the parking assistance apparatus according to wherein the processor determines a traveling direction based on the shift stage signal, calculates a movement distance by using the wheel signal, calculates a rotation angle by using the steering angle signal, and moves the vehicle model according to the traveling direction, the movement distance, and the rotation angle (paras. 0130-0132 describe sensor information including direction information of the vehicle, position information, speed information, acceleration information, tilt information, forward/backward movement information, and a steering sensor by steering wheel rotation). Claims 8-10 are rejected using similar reasoning as corresponding claims above. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Nagamine et al. discloses a vehicle periphery image generation apparatus. Yamamoto et al. (US Pub. No. 2019/03962229) discloses a parking space recognition apparatus. Bae et al. (US Pat. No. 10,766,484) discloses a parking assistance apparatus. Lee et al. (US Pub. No. 2022/0198202) discloses a vehicle camera and a parking assistance apparatus. Hong et al. (US Pub. No. 2022/0203894) discloses a vehicle surround viewing monitor (SVM) system. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Mishawn N Hunter whose telephone number is (571)272-7635. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7am-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thai Tran can be reached at 571-272-7382. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MISHAWN N. HUNTER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2484
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 17, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597446
AUTOMATIC BESPOKE EDITS OF VIDEO CONTENT USING AI
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597447
AN ONLINE COURSE DELIVERY FEEDBACK CONTENT EDITING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596243
LASER SCANNING MICROSCOPE WITH ELECTRICAL HIGH-ORDER MODULATION EXTRACTION MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594888
HITCH ANGLE DETECTION SYSTEM, HITCH ANGLE DETECTION DEVICE, AND NON-TRANSITORY RECORDING MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592262
METHOD, APPARATUS, READABLE MEDIUM AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR VIDEO PREVIEW
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+14.5%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 982 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month