Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/030,453

AIR-CONDITIONING DEVICE, DRAINAGE CONTROL METHOD AND APPARATUS THEREFOR, AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 17, 2025
Priority
Aug 03, 2023 — CN 202310978368.4 +1 more
Examiner
DUKE, EMMANUEL E
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Midea Group Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
793 granted / 1155 resolved
+8.7% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+27.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
1176
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
51.6%
+11.6% vs TC avg
§102
27.6%
-12.4% vs TC avg
§112
18.1%
-21.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1155 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 10 is objected to because of the following informalities: In claim 10, line 1; the phrase “An air-conditioning device” should be changed to --the air-conditioning device-- for proper antecedent basis. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 2. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION. — The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Claim 1, recites the limitation of “A drainage control method for an air-conditioning device”, however, it is unclear how the drainage control method can be implemented without a means; such as - a drainage control program; as disclose in applicant specification paragraph [0017]. In so far that this limitation may require a structure, is not understood what that structure is (manually or other means). It is unclear what structure would yield this function as described within the claim. As such the claim limitation is indefinite. Claims 2-7 are rejected based upon their dependency from claim 1. Allowable Subject Matter 3. Claim 8 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 9 and 10 are allowed. REASONS FOR ALLOWANCE 4. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art of record when consider as a whole, alone or in combination, neither anticipates nor renders obvious the recited limitations of independent claim 9. The following references (CN-113739351-A) to ZOU, Hai-ru, (JP-2016114278-A) to AOKI TOSHIKAZU and (JP-H11351603-A) to SEKIGUCHI YUTAKA; are the most relevant references; however, they fail to anticipate or render obvious the invention of independent claim 9. Therefore, the independent claim and dependent claims thereof have been found to be allowable. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EMMANUEL E DUKE whose telephone number is (571)270-5290. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday thru Friday; 8:00 AM to 4:00 PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, FRANTZ JULES can be reached on (571)272-6681. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EMMANUEL E DUKE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3763 07/17/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 17, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12704307
Rigid Refreezable Portable Storage Container Insert
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12703817
HEAT TRANSFER COMPOSITIONS, METHODS, AND SYSTEMS
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12692455
REFRIGERATION CYCLE DEVICE AND COMPRESSOR
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12692944
Electronic Expansion Valve
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12687242
Electronic Expansion Valve
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+27.6%)
2y 11m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1155 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month