Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/030,599

ELECTRODE PIECE AND BATTERY

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 17, 2025
Priority
Dec 30, 2020 — CN 202011628643.2 +2 more
Examiner
WEINER, LAURA S
Art Unit
1723
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Zhuhai Cosmx Battery Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
984 granted / 1155 resolved
+20.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
1189
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
50.8%
+10.8% vs TC avg
§102
15.5%
-24.5% vs TC avg
§112
18.0%
-22.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1155 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 2-12-2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1, 3-8, 10, 18 and 20 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claims 1, 3-8, 10, 18 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 is rejected because unclear where the tab is provided on the 1st surface. This is not cited in claim 1. Figure 1, shows that the tab (4) is positioned in the center of the current collector (1) PNG media_image1.png 209 593 media_image1.png Greyscale separating the bottom coating layer (2) from each other and separating the active material layer (3) from each other. Claim 1 is rejected because it is unclear what the difference is between the phrase “the thickness of the active material layer of the recessed area is less than the thickness of the active material layer of the normal area” and “a thickness of the recessed area is less than a thickness of the normal” because each of the phrases are stating that the thickness of the active material layer of the recessed area is less than the thickness of the material layer of the normal area. Claim 1 requires that the functional layer on the first surface of the current collector requires an active material layer. This makes the claim vague and indefinite. Claim 1 is rejected because it is unclear where the adhesive tape (5) is adhered to the tab surface (4) because the tab (4) is positioned on the current collector (1). Claim 1 should cite “wherein the 1st surface is provided with a 1st surface of a tab, the functional layer… and the adhesive tape is adhered to the tab on the 2nd surface of the tab and covering at least part of the recessed area on both sides of the tab…; there is a gap between the adhesive tape and the normal area along a length direction of the electrode piece and there is a gap between the tab and the recessed area of the functional layer; wherein a thickness of the tab is not greater than the thickness of the normal area; and the active material layer comprises a 1st active material…”. Claim Objections Claims 7-8 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claims 7-8 are objected to because the claims should be moved up into claim 1 to further define where the tab is located because claim 1 from which the claim depends from was rejected for this reason. Appropriate correction is required. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Zhang (CN 211088397) teaches PNG media_image2.png 163 306 media_image2.png Greyscale Sun et al. (CN 112802992) teaches PNG media_image3.png 79 318 media_image3.png Greyscale a pole piece comprising a current collector, a first active layer and a second active layer. Sun et al. (CN 112820852) teaches PNG media_image4.png 77 301 media_image4.png Greyscale a negative plate comprising a current collector, a 1st active layer and a 2nd active layer. Hitachi Maxell( JP 6-734059) teaches in [0012]-[0052],[0057],[0120]-[0122]; Fig. 1), an electrode piece, comprising a current collector (21) and a functional layer (22) located on a first surface of the current collector, wherein the first surface is provided with a tab (23), and the functional layer (22) on the first surface is composed of a normal area away from the tab and a recessed area near the tab (i.e. area where the collector is exposed since the functional layer has thickness and a thickness of the recessed area is less than a thickness of the normal area. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Laura Weiner whose telephone number is (571)272-1294. The examiner can normally be reached 9 am-5 pm EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tong Guo can be reached at 571-272-3066. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LAURA S. WEINER/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 1723 /Laura Weiner/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1723
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Jul 31, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Oct 29, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 19, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jan 23, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 29, 2026
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 12, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 15, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683186
ALL-SOLID-STATE SECONDARY BATTERY
4y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683166
Composite Particle Including Electrode Material and Electrode for Electrochemical Device Including the Same
1y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12665192
INTERMETALLIC ANODE MATERIALS FOR LITHIUM-ION BATTERIES
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12658423
RECHARGEABLE ZINC METAL BATTERY
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12651771
ELECTROLYTIC SOLUTION FOR LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERIES AND LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+14.3%)
3y 1m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1155 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month