Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/030,721

MEDICAL TREATMENT SYSTEM AND METHODS USING A PLURALITY OF FLUID LINES

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 17, 2025
Priority
Jul 07, 2010 — provisional 61/362,259 +8 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, SANG H
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
DEKA Products Limited Partnership
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
1295 granted / 1461 resolved
+28.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 12m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
1483
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
§103
81.3%
+41.3% vs TC avg
§102
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
§112
4.5%
-35.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1461 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 04/16/25 has been acknowledged and considered. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: (a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a), the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned at the time any inventions covered therein were made absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and invention dates of each claim that was not commonly owned at the time a later invention was made in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c) and potential pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e), (f) or (g) prior art under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a). Claims 1-19 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Kamen et al (US Patent No. 5,628,908 hereinafter “Kamen”) in view of Chan et al (US 2005/0034625 hereinafter “Chan”). Regarding claims 1 and 9; Kamen discloses a disposable fluid line organizer (42 @ figures 1 and 3-5) mounted on a dialysis cycler (14 @ figure 1) comprising: a tube holder section (100 @ figure 1) including: a raised section (figures 3-5) that extends horizontally along a top edge of the organizer (42 @ figures 1 and 3-5); a plurality of vertically oriented slots (44, 46 @ figures 3-5) in the raised section (figures 3-5) that are open (52 @ figure 4-5) to a front of the organizer (42 @figures 3-5) having a generally cylindrical shape (figures 4-5), wherein an opening (46 @ figures 3-5) on a front of each of the plurality of slots (44 @ figures 3-5); and a plurality of ramps (figures 3-5) that extend outward from a back of the organizer (42 @ figure 1 and 3-5) whereby the organizer (42 @ figures 1 and 3-5) is angled away from the dialysis cycler (14 @ figure 1) when the organizer (42 @ figures 1 and 3-5) is inserted in a clip (111, 114, 115 @ figure 6 and col.11 lines 65-67: e.g., A door latch 115 operated by a latch handle 111 contacts a latch pin 114 when the door 106 is closed. Moving the latch handle 111 downward when the door 106 is closed engages the latch 115 to the pin 114 to lock the door 106) on the cycler (14 @ figures 1 and 5); a base (figures 1 and 3-5) of the organizer (42 @ figures 1 and 3-5) that is flexibly attached to a bottom of the tube holder section (100 @ figures 1 and 3-5), wherein the base is configured to be received in a clip with a U-shape (110 @ figure 6); and a tab (48 @ figures 1 and 4) that is flexibly attached to a top of the tube holder section (100 @ figures 1 and 4). See figures 1-35 PNG media_image1.png 803 1386 media_image1.png Greyscale Kamen discloses all of feature of claimed invention except for an opening on a front of each of the plurality of slots is slightly narrower than a width of the cylindrical shape. However, Chan teaches that it is known in the art to provide an opening on a front of each of the plurality of slots is slightly narrower than a width of the cylindrical shape (paragraph [0052]: e.g., For proper retention of shock tubes within the slot, the width of the slot is preferably slightly narrower than the cross-sectional diameter of the shock tubes. In this way, the shock tubes are slightly squeezed without inducing any substantially change in the diameter of the tubes). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of claimed invention to combine the disposable fluid line organizer of Kamen with an opening on a front of each of the plurality of slots is slightly narrower than a width of the cylindrical shape as taught by Chan for the purpose of very high insertion forces are generally required to force shock tubes into a slot defined by a substantially inflexible shock tube retention. Regarding claims 2 and 11; Kamen discloses the cylindrical shape of each of the plurality of slot (44 @ figures 3-5) is sized to retain a fluid line (30, 32 @ figures 3-5) with a pre-determined force. Regarding claims 3 and 12; Kamen discloses further comprising a plurality of recessed segments (inside slot holders 44 @ figures 3-5) that extend horizontally along a bottom edge of the organizer (42 @ figures 3-5) and below the raised section (figure s 3-5). Regarding claims 4 and 13; Kamen discloses the base of the organizer (42 @ figures 3-5) includes a recessed segment (inside slot holders 44 @ figures 3-5) that is defined by a raised ring that surrounds the recessed segment (figures 3-5). Regarding claims 5 and 16; Kamen discloses the tab (48 @ figure 4) includes a plurality of support columns or hollow ribs (figure 4) that extend upward from the tube holder section (100 @ figure 5). Regarding claims 6 and 17; Kamen discloses the tab (48 @ figure 4) includes a raised rib area (figure 4). Regarding claims 7 and 18; Kamen discloses recessed segments (44 @ figure 4) in the tube holder section (100 @ figure 1 and 5) are separated by support columns or hollow ribs that are oriented vertically (figures 4-5). Regarding claims 8 and 19; Kamen discloses the ramps (figures 3-5) are aligned horizontally with the recessed segments (44 @ figure 3-5). Regarding claim 10; Kamen discloses the clip (111, 114, 115 @ figure 6) includes a lip at a top (114 @ figure 6) of the U shape (figure 2 and 6). Regarding claim 14; Kamen discloses the raised ring is hollow and open (52 @ figures 3-5) to the back of the organizer (42 @ figures 1 and 3-5). Regarding claim 15; Kamen discloses the clip (111, 114, 115 @ figure 6) includes tabs (48 @ figures 2 and 4) that project from a back of the U-shaped clip (110 @ figure 6) and are configured to engage with the raised ring on the base of the tube organizer (42 @ figures 1 and 3-5). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Gara et al (US 2006/0155236) discloses methods and apparatus for collecting and treating blood component. An apparatus and methods for improvement of an extracorporeal photopheresis treatment is described. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SANG H NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-2425. The examiner can normally be reached M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michelle Iacoletti can be reached at 571-270-5789. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SN/ May 30, 2026 /SANG H NGUYEN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2877
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 17, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679717
METHOD FOR EVALUATING 3D DATA REPRESENTING A 3D SHAPE, AUXILIARY DEVICE OBTAINED USING SUCH 3D DATA, AND METHOD FOR OBTAINING SUCH 3D DATA
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674719
SYSTEM FOR MEASURING ROUGHNESS OF CORE SIDEWALL OF OPTICAL WAVEGUIDE BASED ON MODE EXCITATION
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12669439
SURFACE-ENHANCED RAMAN SCATTERING (SERS) INDUCED STRUCTURE TRANSFER METHOD FOR RUBBING TECHNIQUES
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12663364
WATER TURBIDITY EVALUATION USING IMAGE SENSOR
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12663337
LENS LOOSENING TEST DEVICE AND LENS LOOSENING TEST METHOD
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+11.7%)
1y 12m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1461 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month