Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/030,887

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUGMENTED REALITY

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Jan 17, 2025
Examiner
FOX, JOSEPH PATRICK
Art Unit
2622
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Magic Leap Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allow Rate
283 granted / 416 resolved
+6.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
434
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
63.1%
+23.1% vs TC avg
§102
15.2%
-24.8% vs TC avg
§112
16.3%
-23.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 416 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 1/17/25 was considered by the examiner. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-17 are rejected on the grounds of nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-12, 14-16, 27, and 29 of US 11,347,054. US 11,347,054 Current Application (19/030,887) 1. A display system comprising: a head-mounted augmented reality display device configured to be worn by a user, and configured to present virtual content to the user; one or more sensors; and one or more processors, and computer storage media storing instructions that when executed by the display system, cause the display system to perform operations comprising: obtaining information, detected via the sensors of the system, identifying an optical code within a field of view of display system or a wireless transmitter proximate to the display system, wherein the optical code or wireless transmitter trigger access to virtual content; accessing user profile information associated with the user, the user profile information including customized settings associated with presentation of virtual content, wherein the customized settings are set by the user, and wherein the customized settings include: one or more types of virtual content which are disallowed for presentation to the user; a maximum size associated with presented virtual content; and a maximum number of virtual objects presented at a same time to the user; estimating a depth of the optical code or the wireless transmitter, the depth representing an estimated distance of the display system to the optical code or wireless transmitter; obtaining, via the triggered access, virtual content to be presented via the system, the virtual content being presented as augmented reality content visible within an ambient environment, wherein the ambient environment includes a real-world object which is detectable by the processors via the sensors and is associated with the virtual content, and wherein the obtained virtual content is indicated as being allowable for presentation based on the customized settings; selecting a depth plane of a plurality of depth planes at which to present the virtual content, the depth plane selected based on the estimated depth of the optical code or the wireless transmitter, and the depth plane corresponding to the estimated depth; and presenting, via the augmented reality display device, the virtual content at the selected depth plane in accordance with the customized settings, wherein the real-world object is configured as an input device, and wherein movement of the real-world object causes corresponding movement of the virtual content as presented at the selected depth plane. 1. A method, performed by a display system that includes a head-mounted augmented reality display device that is worn by a user and that presents virtual content to the user; one or more sensors; and one or more processors, and computer storage media storing instructions that when executed by the display system, cause the display system to perform the method, the method comprising: obtaining information, detected via the one or more sensors of the display system, and identifying an optical code within a field of view of display system or a wireless transmitter proximate to the display system, wherein the optical code or wireless transmitter trigger access to virtual content; accessing user profile information associated with the user, the user profile information including customized settings associated with presentation of virtual content, wherein the customized settings are set by the user, and wherein the customized settings include: one or more types of virtual content which are disallowed for presentation to the user, a maximum size associated with presented virtual content, and a maximum number of virtual objects presented at a same time to the user; estimating a depth of the optical code or the wireless transmitter, the depth representing an estimated distance of the display system to the optical code or wireless transmitter; obtaining, via the triggered access, virtual content to be presented via the display system, the virtual content being presented as augmented reality content visible within an ambient environment, wherein the ambient environment includes a real-world object which is detectable by the processors via the one or more sensors and is associated with the virtual content, and wherein the obtained virtual content is indicated as being allowable for presentation based on the customized settings; selecting a depth plane of a plurality of depth planes at which to present the virtual content, the depth plane selected based on the estimated depth of the optical code or the wireless transmitter, and the depth plane corresponding to the estimated depth; and presenting, via the head-mounted augmented reality display device, the virtual content at the selected depth plane in accordance with the customized settings, wherein the real-world object is an input device, and wherein movement of the real-world object causes corresponding movement of the virtual content as presented at the selected depth plane. Although the conflicting claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because besides wording, there are no significant differences between the limitations claimed except for minor obvious variants and the claims of the present application being directed to the method performed by the augmented reality display device versus the system having the augmented reality display device of US 11,347,054. Claims 2-3, 5-13, and 14-16 of the present application correspond to claims 2-3, 4-12, and 14-16 of US 11,347,054. Claim 4 of the present application corresponds to claim 29 of US 11,347,054. Claim 17 of the present application corresponds to claim 27 of US 11,347,054. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 18-22 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Regarding claim 18, none of the cited prior art references teaches each of the features of the claim including: accessing user profile information associated with the user, the user profile information including customized settings associated with presentation of virtual content, wherein the customized settings are set by the user, and wherein the customized settings include: one or more types of virtual content which are disallowed for presentation to the user; a maximum size associated with presented virtual content; and a maximum number of virtual objects presented at a same time to the user; estimating a depth of the QR code, the depth representing an estimated distance of the augmented reality display device to the QR code; decoding the QR code, and obtaining an indication of a network location; providing a request to the network location for virtual content, wherein the virtual content is indicated as being allowable for presentation based on the customized settings; selecting a waveguide of the plurality of stacked waveguides at which to present virtual content, the selected waveguide being associated with the estimated depth; and presenting, via the selected waveguide, virtual content received in response to the request in accordance with the customized settings, wherein the real-world object is an input device, and wherein movement of the real-world object causes corresponding movement of the virtual content as presented at a selected depth plane. The closest prior art to Mullins et al. (2016/0247324) teaches a method witha head-mounted augmented reality display device configured to be worn by a user, and configured to present virtual content to the user (abstract, Fig. 2, viewing device 101 has virtual content creation module 214); one or more sensors (Fig. 2, sensors 202); and one or more processors, and computer storage media storing instructions that when executed by the display system, cause the display system to perform operations comprising ([0022], Fig. 2, processor 206, AR application 212 is stored in computer storage media storing instructions executed by the display system of device 101, storage device 208 stores instructions): obtaining information, detected via the sensors of the system, identifying an optical code within a field of view of the display system or a wireless transmitter proximate to the display system, wherein the optical code or wireless transmitter trigger access to the virtual content ([0022-0026, 0041, 0050-0053], virtual content triggered based on wireless bluetooth, beacon signal from the object; [0022], physical object can include QR code for identifying the object by the AR application which then provides virtual object or content); estimating a depth of the optical code or the wireless transmitter, the depth representing an estimated distance of the display system to the optical code or wireless transmitter ([0025], HMD associates virtual content with identifiers of the physical object and tracking data related to the physical object; tracking date includes Bluetooth, beacon signal and a distance between the HMD and the physical device (including QR code associated with physical object)); obtaining, via the triggered access, virtual content to be presented via the system, the virtual content being presented as augmented reality content visible within an ambient environment ([0003, 0022-0026], augmented reality with artificial information as visible content; content is virtual object associated with a physical object); and presenting, via the augmented reality display device, the virtual content ([0022-0026], virtual content is presented at the location of the physical object). However, Mullins does not teach selecting a depth plane of a plurality of depth planes at which to present the virtual content, the depth plane selected based on the estimated depth of the optical code or the wireless transmitter, the depth plane corresponding to the estimated depth; presenting the virtual content at the selected depth plane; accessing user profile information associated with the user, the user profile information including customized settings associated with presentation of virtual content, wherein the customized settings are set by the user, and wherein the customized settings include: one or more types of virtual content which are disallowed for presentation to the user; a maximum size associated with presented virtual content; and a maximum number of virtual objects presented at a same time to the user; estimating a depth of the QR code, the depth representing an estimated distance of the augmented reality display device to the QR code; decoding the QR code, and obtaining an indication of a network location; providing a request to the network location for virtual content, wherein the virtual content is indicated as being allowable for presentation based on the customized settings; selecting a waveguide of the plurality of stacked waveguides at which to present virtual content, the selected waveguide being associated with the estimated depth; and presenting, via the selected waveguide, virtual content received in response to the request in accordance with the customized settings, wherein the real-world object is an input device, and wherein movement of the real-world object causes corresponding movement of the virtual content as presented at a selected depth plane. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSEPH PATRICK FOX whose telephone number is (571) 270-3877. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00-5:30 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Patrick Edouard can be reached at 571-272-7603. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JOSEPH PATRICK FOX Examiner Art Unit 2622 /JOSEPH P FOX/Examiner, Art Unit 2622 /PATRICK N EDOUARD/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2622
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 17, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §DP
Apr 06, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602135
Display Device and Pen Touch System
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597395
DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF DRIVING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596456
TOUCH DISPLAY DEVICE AND DISPLAY PANEL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592180
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12566504
TACTILE FEEDBACK APPARATUS AND DRIVING METHOD THEREFOR, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+14.8%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 416 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month