Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/031,017

EYEWEAR HAVING MULTIPLE PRINTED CIRCUIT SUBSTRATES

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 17, 2025
Examiner
TRA, TUYEN Q
Art Unit
2872
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Ingeniospec LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
863 granted / 1003 resolved
+18.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1031
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
42.5%
+2.5% vs TC avg
§102
37.2%
-2.8% vs TC avg
§112
13.9%
-26.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1003 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 01/17/2025, 08/13/2025, 09/08/2025, 09/09/2025, 09/10/2025 and 10/14/2025 being considered by the examiner. A copy of initialed form is attached for Applicant’s record. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (b) the invention was patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country or in public use or on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of application for patent in the United States. Claims 1-2 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2) as being anticipated by Cochran, Jr. (US 4,254,451 A of record). Regarding claim 1, Cochran, Jr. discloses an eyewear, in figure 1, comprising: an eyewear frame (10) having a front area including or coupling to first and second side pieces (12a or 12, 14a or 14), the first and second side pieces (12a or 12, 14a or 14) being provided at opposite sides of the front area of the eyewear frame (10), at least a portion of the first side piece (12a or 12) being provided at or adjacent to a first side of the front area and extending rearward therefrom, at least a portion of the second side piece (14a or 14) being provided at or adjacent to a second side of the front area and extending rearward therefrom; a first flexible printed circuit board internal to the front area of the eyewear frame (col.3, lines 43-53); a first integrated circuit provided internal to the front area of the eyewear frame, the first integrated circuit being mounted on the first flexible printed circuit board(col.4, lines 24-36); a second flexible printed circuit board internal to the front area of the eyewear frame (col.3, lines 43-53); and a second integrated circuit provided internal to the front area of the eyewear frame, the second integrated circuit being mounted on the second flexible printed circuit board (col. 4, lines 24-36; col.7, lines 4-8). Regarding claim 2, Cochran, Jr. discloses the eyewear as recited in claim 1. Cochran, Jr. further discloses wherein the eyewear comprises: a first electrical component (figure 2)(e.g. batteries 18 or control dial 22 or switch 44) in the first side piece (12); and a second electrical component (figure 1)(battery 18) in the second side piece (14), wherein the first electrical component is electrically connected to the first integrated circuit or the second integrated circuit provided in the front area, and wherein the second electrical component is electrically connected to the first integrated circuit or the second integrated circuit provided in the front area (all electrical component are connected in either on or off state). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. 1. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: (a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 3 is rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Cochran, Jr., as applied to claim 2 above, in view of Swab et al. (US 6,929,365 B2 of record). Cochran, Jr. discloses an eyewear as recited in claim 2 with said electrical components on extended piece. However, Cochran does not disclose wherein the first electrical component includes at least a first speaker, and wherein the second electrical component includes at least a second speaker. Swan et al. is in same field of endeavor and teaches, in figure 10, a first electrical component includes at least a first speaker (60, figure 10), and wherein the second electrical component includes at least a second speaker (62, figure 10) (col.6, lines 31-32). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art, at the time the invention was made, to apply teachings of Swab et al. to device of Cochran for purpose of letting users listen to music or take calls while remaining aware of your surroundings. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TUYEN TRA whose telephone number is (571)272-2343. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Bumsuk Won can be reached at 571-272-2713. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TUYEN TRA/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2872
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 17, 2025
Application Filed
Nov 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Mar 12, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 07, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596270
EYEGLASS LENSES FOR VISION CORRECTION, AND GLASSES COMPRISING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596282
ADAPTIVE WINDOW-TINTING SYSTEM AND METHOD OF USE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596283
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591112
OPTICAL IMAGING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12578594
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING ELECTRONIC LIGHT-MODULATING DEVICE, LIGHT-MODULATING ELECTRONIC ELEMENT, AND ELECTRONIC LIGHT-MODULATING GLASSES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+10.1%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1003 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month