Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 19/031,091

LEAKAGE CURRENT DETECTION AND INTERRUPTION DEVICE, ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR AND ELECTRICAL APPLIANCE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 17, 2025
Priority
Sep 16, 2022 — CN 202211131788.0 +2 more
Examiner
THOMAS, LUCY M
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Chengli LI
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
513 granted / 822 resolved
+2.4% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
848
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
55.1%
+15.1% vs TC avg
§102
29.0%
-11.0% vs TC avg
§112
12.6%
-27.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 822 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claims 24-31 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 24, line 11 recites, “a third semiconductor switch” without reciting a first semiconductor switch and a second semiconductor switch previously. Claims 25-31 depend from objected Claim 24. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 25, line 3 recites, “a first solenoid”, which should be corrected to “the first solenoid” to have proper antecedent basis. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 25, line 5 recites, “a second semiconductor switch”, without reciting a first semiconductor switch previously. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 24-31 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Li (US 2018/0109102, Li ‘102). Regarding Claim 24, Li ‘102 discloses a leakage current detection and interruption device (Figures 1-6) comprising: power supply lines having an input end and an output end (comprising L, N with input/ end at LINE and output end at LOAD, Figures 1-6); a switch module (comprising 4, Figures 1-6) coupled to the power supply lines between the input end and the output end (4 coupled between LINE and LOAD, Figures 1-6), configured to control an electrical connection between the input end and the output end (Paragraphs 24, 26-27); a leakage current detection module (comprising 3, Figures 1-6), configured to detect a leakage current in the power supply lines and to generate a leakage fault signal in response thereto (leakage current signal output from 3, Figures 1-6, Paragraph 24); a leakage-responsive drive module (comprising 21, 2, Figures 1-6), and coupled to the leakage current detection module and the switch module (2, 21 coupled to 3 and 4), configured to drive the switch module to disconnect the electrical connection between the input and output ends in response to the leakage fault signal (Paragraph 27, “…the leakage current detection chip U1 detects that the voltage signal generated by the leakage current detection ring ZCT1 reaches a predefined threshold, it controls the SCRs Q1 and Q4 to become conductive. When Q1 and Q4 are conductive, the tripping coils SOL1 and SOL2 experience large currents, which cause the switch module 4 to disconnect the lines…”); a fault-responsive drive module (comprising part of 22, 2, Figures 1-6), including at least a third semiconductor switch (comprising Q4 coupled to SOL2, Figures 1-2, 5-6), wherein in response to a fault in the leakage-responsive drive module or the leakage current detection module, the third semiconductor switch becomes conductive which reduces a current flowing through the first solenoid to below a threshold value, and wherein in response thereto, the switch module disconnects the electrical connection between the input end and the output end (Paragraph 30); and a self-test module (comprising 1, Figures 1-6 ), coupled to the leakage current detection module and the leakage-responsive drive module (1 coupled to 3 and Q in 2, Figures 1-6), configured to generate a self-test signal (Paragraph 29, “…drives transistor Q2 to become conductive, which in turn generates, via resistor R13, a self-test pulse signal on the leakage current detection ring ZCT1”), and to generate a self-test fault signal in response to a fault in the leakage current detection module and/or the leakage-responsive drive module (Paragraph 30, “…the self-testing module 1 detects that the ground fault detection module 3 is malfunctioning, e.g. the leakage current detection chip U1 cannot make transistor Q1 conductive,… diode D2 conducts. As a result, SCR Q1 and/or Q4 become conductive, which causes tripping coils SOL1 and/or SOL2 to move, which in turn controls the switch module 4 to disconnect the power. In use”). Regarding Claim 25, Li ‘102 discloses the leakage current detection and interruption device of Claim 24, wherein the leakage-responsive drive module includes: the first solenoid (21, 2 including SOL1, Figures 1-6), coupled to the switch module (SOL1 coupled to the switch module 4, Figures 1-6), configured to generate an electromagnetic force to drive the switch module (Paragraph 30); a second semiconductor switch (Q1, Figures 1-6), coupled to the first solenoid, the self-test module and the fault-responsive drive module (Q1 coupled to the first solenoid SOL1, the self-test module 1, and 22, Figures 1-6); and a first semiconductor switch (comprising D2, Figures 1-2, D7, Figures 5-6), coupled to the leakage current detection module (D2, D7 coupled to 3, Figures 1-2, 5-6), and to either the second semiconductor switch or the first solenoid (D2, D2 coupled to Q1, Figures 1-2, 5-6) . Regarding Claim 26, Li ‘102 discloses the leakage current detection and interruption device of Claim 24, wherein in absence of any fault, the second semiconductor switch is non-conductive when the self-test module generates the self-test signal (Paragraphs 29, 39). Regarding Claim 27, Li ‘102 discloses the leakage current detection and interruption device of Claim 24, wherein the leakage current detection module includes: a leakage current detection coil (comprising ZCT1/ZCT2, Figures 5-6), wherein the power supply lines include at least a first power supply line and a second power supply line which pass through the leakage current detection coil (comprising L, N lines passing through ZCT1/ZCT2, Figures 5-6), wherein the leakage current detection coil is configured to generate a leakage current signal in response to a leakage current on the first or second power supply line (detection signal from ZCT1/ZCT2 to U1, Figures 5-6); and a leakage current detection unit (comprising U1, Figures 5-6), coupled to the leakage current detection coil and the leakage-responsive drive module (U1 coupled to ZCT1, ZCT2 and Q1, SOL1, Figures 5-6), and configured to receive the leakage current signal and generate a leakage fault signal in response thereto (output from U1 to Q1, Figures 5-6). Regarding Claim 28, Li ‘102 discloses the leakage current detection and interruption device of Claim 27, wherein the self-test module is coupled to the leakage current detection coil (self-test module 1 coupled to the detection coil ZCT1/ZCT2, Figures 1-6), wherein the leakage current detection coil is configured to receive the self-test signal and feed it to the leakage current detection unit (Paragraphs 28-29, “…..the self-testing module 1 periodically applies to the leakage current detection ring ZCT1 a simulated leakage current signal that reaches the predefined threshold value…the comparator U2 (at pin 4 of the comparator U2) outputs a signal, which drives transistor Q2 to become conductive, which in turn generates, via resistor R13, a self-test pulse signal on the leakage current detection ring ZCT1”, Paragraph 30). Regarding Claim 29, Li ‘102 discloses the leakage current detection and interruption device of Claim 25, wherein each of the first. Second, and third semiconductor switch is a transistor, a metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET), a silicon-controlled rectifier (SCR), a photocoupler, or a relay (Figures 1-6, Paragraph 32, Claim 15). Regarding Claim 30, Li ‘102 discloses an electrical power connection device (device connecting and controlling the power from LINE end to LOAD end in Figures 1-6), comprising: a body (housing/enclosure the modules 1-4 are housed, not shown); and the leakage current detection and interruption device of claim 24 (see rejection of Claim 24 above), disposed inside the body (Figures 1-6). Regarding Claim 31, Li discloses an electrical appliance (Figures 1-6), comprising: an electrical load (LOAD, Figures 1-6); and an electrical power connection device coupled between a power supply and the load to supply power to the load (device connecting and controlling the power from LINE end to LOAD end in Figures 1-6), wherein the electrical power connection device includes the leakage current detection and interruption device of claim 24 (see rejection of Claim 24 above). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Baldwin (US 6,807,036) and Macbeth (US 6,674,289) both discloses fault detection and interruption devices including self-testing capabilities Baldwin, Figures 1-5, Macbeth, Figure 1); Chen (US 2012/0032813) discloses in Figures 1-2, a ground fault circuit interrupter (GFCI) with overcurrent protection and end-of-life warning and tripping functions. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LUCY M THOMAS whose telephone number is (571)272-6002. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 9:30 am - 5:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Crystal L Hammond can be reached at (571)270-1682. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LUCY M THOMAS/Examiner, Art Unit 2838, 9/17/2026 /CRYSTAL L HAMMOND/Supervisory Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2838
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 17, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749884
DYNAMIC ADAPTIVE OVERCURRENT PROTECTION
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12734319
RESPIRATION AIDING EQUIPMENT
4y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12722498
Vehicle Electrical System Having A High-Voltage Branch, A Low-Voltage Branch, And Low-Voltage-Side Insulation Fault Detection
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12720829
DEVICE AND METHOD FOR INHIBITING A SUBSTRATE CURRENT IN AN IC SEMICONDUCTOR SUBSTRATE
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12719258
ELECTRICAL ARC-FLASH PROTECTION BASED ON PERSONNEL PROXIMITY SENSING
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+17.9%)
3y 1m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 822 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month