Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 19/032,112

FOOT MASSAGE DEVICE FOR VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 19, 2025
Priority
Jan 29, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0012907
Examiner
GRABER, MARIA EILEEN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Hyundai Transys Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
163 granted / 262 resolved
+2.2% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+32.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
281
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
45.4%
+5.4% vs TC avg
§102
23.2%
-16.8% vs TC avg
§112
27.9%
-12.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 262 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status This action is in response to the application 19/032,112 filed 01/19/2025 which claims priority to Republic of Korea 10-2024-0012907 1/29/2024. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification Applicant is reminded of the proper language and format for an abstract of the disclosure. The abstract should be in narrative form and generally limited to a single paragraph on a separate sheet within the range of 50 to 150 words in length. The abstract should describe the disclosure sufficiently to assist readers in deciding whether there is a need for consulting the full patent text for details. The language should be clear and concise and should not repeat information given in the title. It should avoid using phrases which can be implied, such as, “The disclosure concerns,” “The disclosure defined by this invention,” “The disclosure describes,” etc. In addition, the form and legal phraseology often used in patent claims, such as “means” and “said,” should be avoided. In the instant case, the following implied phrase should be deleted: “Disclosed is a foot massage device for vehicles.” Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-10 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. For purposes of examination on the merits, the claims, as best understood, are examined in the Action below. RE Claim 1: As currently drafted, it is unclear how the massage module performs the recited functions. How does the massage module communicate with the moving module and acupressure members to apply pressure? Is there a controller? It is also unclear how the moving module performs the recited functions. How does the moving module selectively move the plurality of acupressure members? Is there connection to devices that transmits and/or receive information? RE Claim 10: How is the rotational speed controlled? Is there a controller or other similar device? Claims 2-10 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) for being dependent on a rejected base claim. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See attached PTO-892. These documents present alternative designs similar in scope which illustrate relevant features in comparison to the Applicant’s submission. The cited prior art include various massaging devices and footrests. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARIA E GRABER whose telephone number is (571)272-4640. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy D Collins can be reached on 571-272-6886. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MARIA E GRABER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3644
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 19, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741576
HEAD REST
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12733738
Folding Chair
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12733631
Fishing Rod Carrier
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12727579
AUTOMATIC FEEDER APPARATUS, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS THEREOF
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12715556
LIVEWELL SYSTEM
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+32.2%)
2y 1m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 262 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month