Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/032,461

PRINTER AND INTEGRATED LIGHT SOURCE MODULE THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 21, 2025
Examiner
TRAN, HOAN H
Art Unit
2852
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Avision Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
96%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 8m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 96% — above average
96%
Career Allow Rate
524 granted / 546 resolved
+28.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 8m
Avg Prosecution
7 currently pending
Career history
553
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
§103
21.1%
-18.9% vs TC avg
§102
43.2%
+3.2% vs TC avg
§112
12.2%
-27.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 546 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 09/12/2025 has been considered. Specification The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because it contains legal phraseology such as “comprising”. A corrected abstract of the disclosure is required and must be presented on a separate sheet, apart from any other text. See MPEP § 608.01(b). Claim Objections Claims 1 and 8 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 1, line 18, “components” (first occurrence) needs to be changed to --drums--. Claim 1, line 18, “components” (second occurrence) needs to be changed to --units--. Claim 8, line 16, “components” (first occurrence) needs to be changed to --drums--. Claim 8, line 16, “components” (second occurrence) needs to be changed to --units--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Tomohiro et al. [CA 2851099 A1]. Tomohiro et al. disclose an image forming apparatus comprising a chassis [100] including a receptacle [Fig. 1], a photosensitive component including a plurality of photosensitive drums [2] and a photosensitive frame [130; Fig. 30], a light source component [figs. 1 and 32] including a plurality of light source units [6] and the plurality of light source units are respectively corresponded to the plurality of photosensitive drums [Fig. 30], a plurality of toner cartridge [50] which are respectively corresponded to the plurality of photosensitive drums and the plurality of light source units, and a cover assembly including a plate body [109], located on the chassis, to cover the receptacle [Fig. 1]; wherein the cover assembly is located above the plurality of toner cartridges [Fig. 1]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tomohiro et al. in view of Yoshiaki et al. [JP 2005077440 A] Tomohiro et al., as discussed above, disclose the claimed invention except the cover assembly including two support rods. Yoshiaki et al. disclose an image forming apparatus [Fig. 5] comprising a cover assembly including a plate body [16] and two support rods [104]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention was made to have the cover assembly disclosed by Tomohiro et al. including two support rods as taught by Yoshiaki et al. for the purpose of properly aligning the plate body of the cover assembly in the opening/closing position with respective to the chassis of the image forming apparatus. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-6 and 9-12 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HOAN H TRAN whose telephone number is (571)272-2141. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 9AM-5:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Walter Lindsay can be reached on 571-272-1674. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIRsystem, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HOAN H TRAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2852 03/07/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 21, 2025
Application Filed
Mar 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601988
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601990
DEVELOPING CARTRIDGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596316
DEVELOPING CARTRIDGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591201
ADAPTER, CARTRIDGE, AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12591187
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
96%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+4.2%)
1y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 546 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month