Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 19/032,569

VEHICULAR PROJECTION DISPLAY AT WINDOW OF VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jan 21, 2025
Priority
Jan 25, 2024 — provisional 63/624,811
Examiner
CRUZ, MAGDA
Art Unit
2882
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Magna Exteriors Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
758 granted / 870 resolved
+19.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
891
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
40.8%
+0.8% vs TC avg
§102
38.6%
-1.4% vs TC avg
§112
13.2%
-26.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 870 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 09/23/2025 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being incomplete for omitting essential elements, such omission amounting to a gap between the elements. See MPEP § 2172.01. The omitted elements are: means to determine the presence of an authorized user outside of the vehicle and at or near the window panel of the vehicle. Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being incomplete for omitting essential elements, such omission amounting to a gap between the elements. See MPEP § 2172.01. The omitted elements are: means to determine the presence of a person outside of the vehicle, the person is identified as an authorized user of the vehicle; and where in, responsive at least in part to identification of the authorized user outside of the vehicle and at or near the window panel of the vehicle. Claims 2-11 and 13-19 fall with parent claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 20-25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Pisz. Pisz (US Pub. No. 2015/0180999 A1) discloses (see annotated Figure 4): PNG media_image1.png 598 794 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 20, a vehicular display system (i.e. system for automated interaction; page 1, paragraph 0010, lines 1-2), the vehicular display system (Figure 2, element 300) comprising: a projection device (Figure 2, element 42) disposed within an interior cabin (page 2, paragraph 0033, lines 10-12) of a vehicle (element 20); wherein the projection device (Figure 2, element 42) is operable to project information toward an inner side of a window panel (Figure 2, element 22) of the vehicle for viewing of the projected information by a person outside of the vehicle (page 2, paragraph 0033, lines 7-10); wherein a person (i.e. user) present outside of the vehicle (element 20) is detected via at least one selected from the group consisting of (i) a passive entry device of the person, (ii) a signal from the person's smart phone, and (iii) a proximity sensor of the vehicle (page 4, paragraph 0045, lines 8-16); wherein, responsive at least in part to detection of the person (i.e. user) outside of the vehicle (element 20), the person is identified (page 1, paragraph 0005, lines 4-6); and where in, responsive at least in part to identification of the detected person as an authorized user (page 1, paragraph 0006, lines 4-6), and responsive to determination that the authorized user is at or near the window panel (Figure 1, element 22) of the vehicle (Figure 1, element 20), the projection device projects information for viewing by the identified authorized user of the vehicle (page 1, paragraph 0006, lines 8-9). Regarding claim 21, the projection device (element 42) is disposed at a roof panel (i.e. interior or location within the vehicle; page 2, paragraph 0033, lines 10-11) of the vehicle (element 20). Regarding claim 22, the window panel (Figure 1, element 22) comprises a fixed side window panel of the vehicle (Figure 1, element 20). Regarding claim 23, the window panel (Figure 1, element 22) comprises a movable side window panel (Figure 1, element 22) of the vehicle (Figure 1, element 20), and wherein operation of the projection device (element 42) is controlled in part based on an opened/closed status of the movable side window panel (Figure 1, element 22). Regarding claim 24, the window panel comprises a rear window panel (Figure 4, element A) of the vehicle (Figure 4, element 20). Regarding clam 25, the projected information comprises a vehicle status (Figure 12, element 208). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Kunii et al. (US Pub. No. 2020/0231085 A1) discloses an image projection apparatus that projects an image including: an acquisition unit that acquires information to be displayed; and an image projection unit that projects the image based on the information to be displayed acquired by the acquisition unit. Mc Call (US Pub. No. 2006/0145825 A1) teaches an apparatus including a virtual interface for entry control of a vehicle having an imaging surface that defines a field of view. The interface includes a projected keypad image on the imaging surface having at least one image of a reconfigurable key within the field of view and a gesture detector and translator having a scope of operation within the field of view. The image of the reconfigurable key may have a configuration based on a user preference. Yang et al. (CN 110933388 A) shows a projection imaging system, method, device and vehicle. with imaging film on the window of the vehicle, the system comprising: a controller and a projector projection; the projection controller, for inputting the image information to the projector, and control the projector for projection, the projector for performing projection on the imaging film according to the image information so that the image content of the projection imaging on the imaging film. The method can by projector with low cost to realize the convey information to the user of car, meanwhile, it does not need the display screen with high cost, reduces the cost for information transmission to the user outside the vehicle. Sawada (JP 2011-006034 A) discloses an on-vehicle control unit displaying an image in a car inside or a car outside on a vehicular window via a projector. The image displayed on the vehicular window is visible inside/outside the car, while securing high visibility even in a plurality of people. A user can switch to a desired screen, by touch operation a screen displayed inside/outside the car on the window. Convenience is enhanced by allowing the touch operation for the screen displayed on the vehicular window. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MAGDA CRUZ whose telephone number is (571)272-2114. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday from 9:00 AM to 5:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Toan Ton can be reached at 571-272-2303. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MAGDA CRUZ/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 2882 09/26/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 21, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12769195
MULTI-FUNCTION PROJECTOR
2y 9m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12769194
PROJECTOR
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12761541
STRIPE PROJECTION SYSTEM
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12761465
COLOR WHEEL MODULE AND PROJECTOR
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12754467
REFLECTIVE DIFFUSION DEVICE AND PROJECTION DEVICE
3y 1m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+9.6%)
2y 3m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 870 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month