Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/033,459

IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jan 21, 2025
Examiner
THERRIEN, CARLA J
Art Unit
2852
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Kyocera Document Solutions Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 7m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
544 granted / 630 resolved
+18.3% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 7m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
653
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
38.8%
-1.2% vs TC avg
§102
33.3%
-6.7% vs TC avg
§112
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 630 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Objections Claims 1 and 3 are objected to because of the following informalities: In the 2nd line of the 5th paragraph of claim 1, “toner to be replenishment” should be corrected to --toner to be replenished--. In the 5th line of claim 3, “a part the” should be corrected to --a part of the--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The last paragraph of claim 1 recites “the toner container arranged in the detachment position is detached along the cover arranged at the close position.” Based on Applicant’s disclosure, it is unclear how the toner container can be detached along the cover when it is at the close position (see Figs. 1 and 4-6 and [0028-0029]). As such, claim 1 is rendered indefinite. For examination purposes, the last paragraph of claim 1 will be interpreted as “the toner container arranged in the detachment position is detached along the cover arranged at the open position.” Claims 2-5 are rendered indefinite due to their dependence upon claim 1. Note: the following rejections are based upon the claims as best understood by Examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ikeda et al. (JP 2007-065271; “Ikeda”). (Note: cited paragraphs correspond to those in the machine translation of Ikeda provided by Applicant.) Regarding claim 1, Ikeda discloses an image forming apparatus 10 (Fig. 1 [0027]) comprising: a cover 105 which opens and closes a side surface of an apparatus main body (Figs. 7-8 & 10a-10b); and a toner container 17 which is detachably attached to an inside of the apparatus main body, wherein the cover is turned in a reciprocating manner between a close position V2 (Fig. 10a [0065]) standing upright along the side surface of the apparatus main body and an open position V1 (Fig. 10b [0065]) inclined outside the apparatus main body around a lower portion of the cover such that an angle between the side surface of the apparatus main body and the cover is acute (Fig. 10b), the toner container 17 includes a replenishment vessel 20 in which a toner to be replenishment is contained (Fig. 3 [0032]) and a recovery vessel 90 in which the toner to be disposed is contained (Fig. 3 [0037]), the replenishment vessel and the recovery vessel being arranged in an upper-and-lower direction (Fig. 3), the toner container 17 is turned in a reciprocating manner between an attachment position V2 standing upright inside the apparatus main body (Fig. 10a [0068, 0101]) and a detachment position V1 inclined outside the apparatus main body (Fig. 10b [0068, 0101]) around a lower portion 107 of the toner container so as to be along the cover (Figs. 10a-10b [0070]), and the toner container arranged in the detachment position is detached along the cover arranged at the open position (Fig. 10b [0101]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-5 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Prior art of record does not disclose or suggest the claimed “the replenishment port is arranged on an inner side of the apparatus main body from a vertical imaginary line extending in an upper-and-lower direction passing a turning shaft of the toner container, and the recovery port is arranged on an outer side of the apparatus main body from the vertical imaginary line” in combination with the remaining limitations of claims 2-5. Prior Art The prior art made of record on form PTO-892 and not relied upon is cited as related art. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CARLA J THERRIEN whose telephone number is (571)272-2677. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8 am - 4 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Stephanie Bloss can be reached at (571)272-3555. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CARLA J THERRIEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2852
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 21, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601998
IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD OF CONTROLLING IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596321
IDENTIFICATION OF GAS CONVEYANCE MALFUNCTIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596320
CORRECTING DENSITY UNEVENNESS IN IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12585220
IMAGE FORMING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585211
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+4.4%)
1y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 630 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month