Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 19/033,897

PIXEL MODULE EMPLOYING MOLDING MEMBER HAVING MULTI-MOLDING LAYER AND DISPLAYING APPARATUS HAVING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 22, 2025
Priority
Feb 18, 2021 — provisional 63/150,806 +1 more
Examiner
BOWMAN, MARY ELLEN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1168 granted / 1426 resolved
+21.9% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
1441
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
56.6%
+16.6% vs TC avg
§102
27.2%
-12.8% vs TC avg
§112
4.3%
-35.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1426 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDSs) submitted on 4/20/26, 2/6/26, 2/28/25, and 1/22/25 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jang et al., US 2020/0303605 in view of Kubota et al., WO 2015/019532. Regarding claim 1, Jang teaches a displaying apparatus ([0003]), comprising: a panel substrate ([0003]); and a plurality of pixel modules disposed on the panel substrate, each of the pixel modules comprising: a circuit board (11p); a plurality of unit pixels arranged on the circuit board see Figure 10e); and a molding member (90) covering the plurality of unit pixels, wherein the molding member includes a light diffusion layer (90) such that the molding member is disposed between and on or above the plurality of unit pixels (see Figure 10e and [0119-0124]), and a first thickness of the light diffusion layer disposed between the plurality of unit pixels is different from a second thickness of the light diffusion layer disposed on or above the plurality of unit pixels (see Figure 10e). Jang is silent as to a black molding member. However, in the same field of endeavor of display devices, Kubota teaches a black molding layer covering the light diffusion layer (Figure 14C, black molding member 68a formed on surface of diffusing layer 63). Further, it would have been well known to those of ordinary skill in the art that a black matrix would serve to improve display quality by ensuring even illumination. Therefore, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to provide a black molding layer on the diffusion layer of the Jang device in order to improve the display quality. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Lee et al., US 2020/0083397 teaches a display device comprising a black molding layer surrounding a plurality of inorganic LEDs, but fails to teach a thickness of a first light diffusion layer is different from a second thickness of a light diffusion layer on or above the pixels. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARY-ELLEN BOWMAN whose telephone number is (571)270-5383. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday; 7:00 am-5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, James Greece can be reached at (571) 272-3711. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MARY ELLEN BOWMAN Examiner Art Unit 2875 /MARY ELLEN BOWMAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2875
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 22, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12751147
DISPLAY APPARATUS, DISPLAY MODULE, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING DISPLAY APPARATUS
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745538
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12727513
DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12727365
DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12719068
HYDROGEN ACTIVATION/IONIZATION ACCELERATING APPARATUS HAVING FINGERPRINT-TYPE PANEL STACK STRUCTURE
1y 11m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+18.2%)
1y 11m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1426 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month