Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 19/033,956

COOLING GUIDE AND MOTOR INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 22, 2025
Priority
Mar 06, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0031763
Examiner
VAZIRI, MASOUD
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Hyundai Mobis Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
128 granted / 172 resolved
+6.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
189
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
§103
54.8%
+14.8% vs TC avg
§102
27.6%
-12.4% vs TC avg
§112
13.8%
-26.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 172 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-10 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-7 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lee et al. (US 20180166950 A1). PNG media_image1.png 640 872 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 416 577 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 1, Lee discloses a cooling guide (fig. 3) attached to a housing (housing, annotated fig. 1) of a motor to guide a flow direction of cooling oil, the cooling guide comprising: an attachment portion (attachment portion, annotated figs. 1 and 3) having a predetermined thickness in a radial direction of the motor (the shell has a thickness, see fig. 1), with one end in the radial direction thereof being attached to the housing (see fig. 1; see also “[0068] For example, the supporter 30 is forcefully inserted to an internal wall of the housing 1, the stator core 4 is forcefully inserted to the supporter 30 by supplying heat and fixed to an internal circumference of the supporter 30 by thermally inserted.”), and extending in an arc shape along a circumferential direction of the motor (see the circular shape in fig. 3); and a partition wall portion (partition wall portion, annotated fig. 3) integrally formed with the attachment portion at another end of the attachment portion in the radial direction (see the one piece unit in figs. 1, 3 and 4), and bringing the cooling oil flowing between the housing and a stator into a collision therewith to guide a spray direction of the cooling oil toward a coil (see the abstract: “A cooling apparatus of a drive motor according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention may include a supporter that is disposed in an inner wall of a housing, supports a stator of the drive motor, and forms an oil passage for moving cooling oil. The supporter can be formed as a ring shape. An injector is connected with the oil passage of the supporter and injects the cooling oil in the oil passage into the stator.”), wherein the attachment portion includes an elastic material (implied, see para [0068]). Regarding claim 2, Lee discloses the cooling guide of claim 1, wherein the partition wall portion protrudes in the radial direction of the stator (see annotated fig. 3), and the partition wall portion comprises a partition wall inclined surface inclined at an end thereof, not perpendicular or parallel to a protruding direction of the partition wall portion (see the inclined portions in the annotated fig. 3; the support piece has a ring shape with inclined surfaces on either radial ends). Regarding claim 3, Lee discloses the cooling guide of claim 2, wherein the partition wall inclined surface is formed on a surface facing upward based on the ground in a space where the housing is installed (see the inclined portions in annotated fig. 3; some of the portions are facing upward; see also annotated fig. 4). PNG media_image3.png 500 707 media_image3.png Greyscale Regarding claim 4, Lee discloses the cooling guide of claim 1, wherein the attachment portion includes a grip portion (grip portion, annotated figs. 3 and 4) extending toward an end in an axial direction of the stator at the other end thereof, with one surface of the grip portion being attached to an inner side surface of the stator (see annotated figs. 1 and 4). Regarding claim 5, Lee discloses the cooling guide of claim 4, wherein another surface of the grip portion is inclined (see the two ends of the grip portion in annotated fig. 4), not perpendicular or parallel to the radial direction and the axial direction of the motor. Regarding claim 6, Lee discloses the cooling guide of claim 5, wherein the grip portion has a groove (groove, annotated fig. 4) having a predetermined depth in the axial direction of the motor on the other surface thereof (the groove is in the axial direction and has a depth to allow fluid flow, see the fluid flow direction arrow in fig. 4). Regarding claim 7, Lee discloses the cooling guide of claim 6, wherein the groove has a circular cross section in the radial direction of the motor (implied- 35 in fig. 4 is a connection hole; “[0046] 35 . . . connection hole”). Regarding claim 9, Lee discloses the cooling guide of claim 1, wherein at least one engagement hole engaged with the housing is formed through the attachment portion (see holes 31 and 33 in fig. 3). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 8 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee et al. (US 20180166950 A1). Regarding claim 8, Lee discloses the cooling guide of claim 6, but does not disclose wherein the groove has a polygonal cross section in the radial direction of the motor. Lee discloses a connection hole (35, fig. 4) for flow of coolant to the nozzles but does not specify the radial cross-section of the hole. However, selecting a hole shape is within the skills of a person having ordinary skills in the art. Furthermore, Applicant has not disclosed any unexpected improvement by selecting a polygonal cross-section. To provide coolant to the nozzles via the groove 35, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention that: the groove has a polygonal cross section in the radial direction of the motor. Regarding claim 10, Lee discloses a motor including the cooling guide of claim 1, the motor comprising: the housing having a central hole into which the stator is fitted (see fig. 1; “[0004] The drive motor includes a stator and a rotor. The stator is disposed in a motor housing, and the rotor is disposed at a predetermined air gap therefrom at the inside of the stator.”), with the cooling guide being coupled to one end thereof (on the right side in annotated fig. 1), wherein the housing includes a guide protruding from another end thereof to have a predetermined length in an axial direction (the cooling guide structure was discussed regarding claim 1), and a surface of the integrated guide facing the stator is inclined (see inclined portions of the cooling guide in annotated figs. 3 and 4), not perpendicular or parallel to the axial direction and the radial direction of the motor. Lee does not disclose the cooling guide is integrated with the housing. However, integrating separate parts into one unit is within the skills of a person having ordinary skills in the art. By doing so, the number of parts is reduced and manufacturing can be simplified. To simplify manufacturing, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention that: the cooling guide and the housing could be integrated. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MASOUD VAZIRI whose telephone number is (571)272-2340. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 8am-5pm EST.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, the examiner’s supervisor, SEYE IWARERE can be reached on (571) 270-5112. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MASOUD VAZIRI/Examiner, Art Unit 2834 /OLUSEYE IWARERE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 22, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12763643
ELECTRICAL MACHINE, AND METHOD FOR COOLING SUCH ELECTRICAL MACHINE
2y 8m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12763647
ELECTRIC DRIVE SYSTEMS WITH INTEGRATED BUS BAR AND INTER-HOUSING BARRIER FOR WORK VEHICLES
2y 3m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12756249
MOTOR ROTOR STRUCTURE AND MOTOR
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12756286
VIBRATION ACTUATOR AND VIBRATION PRESENTATION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12756274
OVERMOLDED TARGET FOR A MOTOR VEHICLE
2y 2m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+7.1%)
2y 5m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 172 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month