Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 19/034,072

AIR-CONTAINMENT SYSTEM BEAM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 22, 2025
Priority
Feb 08, 2024 — CN 202410179006.3
Examiner
WILKENS, JANET MARIE
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Schneider Electric SE
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
919 granted / 1267 resolved
+12.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
1285
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
39.7%
-0.3% vs TC avg
§102
25.4%
-14.6% vs TC avg
§112
27.0%
-13.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1267 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-9, 11-13 and 15-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lin (2011/0176860). Lin teaches an air-containment system beam (see annotated figure below), comprising: a body including a first channel (a) configured to receive a beam connector, a second channel (b) configured to receive an air-containment panel, a third channel (c) configured to receive at least one of a cabinet seal or a ceiling seal, and a fourth channel (d) configured to receive at least one of a cabinet support or a ceiling panel support. Further comprising a fifth channel (e) configured to receive at least one lighting support. Wherein the fifth channel is an open channel positioned at a corner of the body. Wherein the first channel is a closed channel positioned within a middle of the body. Wherein the second channel is an open channel positioned at a side of the body. Wherein the third channel is an open channel positioned at a top or a bottom of the body. Wherein the fourth channel is an open channel positioned at a top or a bottom of the body. Wherein the third channel includes at least one of an upwardly facing channel formed in the body and a downwardly facing channel formed in the body. Wherein the fourth channel includes at least one of an upwardly facing channel formed in the body and a downwardly facing channel formed in the body. Further comprising a connector (1) configured to secure a first beam to a second beam. Wherein the connector includes a straight connector (Fig. 5 right side) configured to connect mating ends of the first beam and the second beam along a common axis. Wherein the connector includes an angled connector (Fig. 5, left side) configured to connect mating ends of the first beam and the second beam, the second beam being perpendicular to the first beam. Lin further inherently teaches a method of fabricating an air-containment system beam (9), the method comprising: forming a first channel (a) in an extruded body (beam 9 is extrusion aluminum frame; paragraph 0018), the first channel being configured to receive a beam connector; forming a second channel (b) in the body, the second channel being configured to receive an air-containment panel; forming a third channel (c) in the body, the third channel being configured to receive at least one of a cabinet seal or a ceiling seal; and forming a fourth channel (d) in the body, the fourth channel being configured to receive at least one of a cabinet support or a ceiling panel support. Wherein the first channel is a closed channel positioned within a middle of the body, the second channel is an open channel positioned at a side of the body, the third channel is an open channel positioned at a top or a bottom of the body, and the fourth channel is an open channel positioned at a top or a bottom of the body. Further comprising forming a fifth channel (e) in the body, the fifth channel being configured to receive at least one lighting support. Wherein the fifth channel is an open channel positioned at a corner of the body. Further comprising securing a connector (1) to a first beam and to a second beam. Wherein the connector includes at least one of a straight connector (Fig. 5, right side) configured to connect mating ends of the first beam and the second beam along a common axis and an angled connector (Fig. 5, left side) configured to connect mating ends of the first beam and the second beam, the second beam being perpendicular to the first beam. PNG media_image1.png 814 746 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lin (2011/0176860) in view of Price (2007/0163188). As stated above, Lin teaches the limitations of claim 1, including a beam. The beam being made of extruded aluminum (paragraph 0018). For claim 10, Lin fails to teach that the beam is fabricated from extruded PVC material. Price teaches that a beam can be made from either aluminum or PVC (paragraph 0012). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the beams of Lin by making them out of PVC material instead of aluminum, such as is taught by Price, to provide a stronger frame structure and/or for personal preferences. Claims 1 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gosselin et al (2018/0132385) in view of Lin (2011/0176860). Gosselin teaches an air-containment structure made up of beams (18). For claims 1 and 14, Gosselin fails to teach the specific beam structure claimed. Lin teaches an air-containment system beam (see annotated figure above), comprising: a body including a first channel (a) configured to receive a beam connector, a second channel (b) configured to receive an air-containment panel, a third channel (c) configured to receive at least one of a cabinet seal or a ceiling seal, and a fourth channel (d) configured to receive at least one of a cabinet support or a ceiling panel support. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the beams of Lin as part of the structure of Gosselin, to provide specific the channel configuration present therein for desired attachments. Since these beams are functionally equivalent to each other, either would work equally well in the structure of Gosselin. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JANET M WILKENS whose telephone number is 571-272-6869. The examiner can normally be reached Mon thru Thurs 7am-5:30pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Daniel Troy can be reached at 571-270-3742. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Wilkens August 26, 2026 /JANET M WILKENS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3637
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 22, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12729565
CABLE INTERLOCK SYSTEM AND RELATED METHODS
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12723805
Insulation Panel Seal
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12722848
NOVEL CARRYING PALLET
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12709931
INVISIBLE HINGE FOR FURNITURE
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12690669
HEIGHT-ADJUSTABLE MULTIFUNCTION TABLE
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+12.6%)
2y 1m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1267 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month