Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/034,145

BATTERY STORAGE AND TRANSPORT SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 22, 2025
Examiner
RODRIGUEZ MOLINA, MARCOS JAVIER
Art Unit
3735
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Redwood Materials Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
52%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
77%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 52% of resolved cases
52%
Career Allow Rate
75 granted / 145 resolved
-18.3% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+25.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
188
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
49.9%
+9.9% vs TC avg
§102
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
§112
27.8%
-12.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 145 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nishino et al. (U. S. Patent Application Publication US20100330404A1) hereinafter NISHINO, in view of Lee et al. (U. S. Patent Application Publication US20220355968A1) hereinafter LEE. Regarding claim 1, NISHINO teaches (see FIG. 2A, FIG. 2B, FIG. 5A, FIG. 5B, FIG. 7A, FIG. 9A, FIG. 13A, FIG. 14A, FIG. 14B, FIG. 15 below) a battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900 comprising: a first series of slots N17B-01 located on a top side N17B-02 of the battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900, wherein a first slot N17B-03 of the first series of slots N17B-01 is configured to at least partially encapsulate a first battery cell N17B-04 for storage and transportation; and a second series of slots N17B-05 located on a bottom side N17B-06 of the battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900, wherein a second slot N17B-08 of the second series of slots N17B-05 is configured to at least partially encapsulate a second battery cell N17B-07 for storage and transportation, wherein the second series of slots N17B-05 is laterally offset from the first series of slots N17B-01. NISHINO fails to teach second series of slots N17B-05 is vertically overlapping the first series of slots N17B-01. However, LEE teaches (see FIG. 2 - FIG. 4 below) a tray 10, 20 for loading a battery cap 30, wherein second series of slots 11 is vertically overlapping the first series of slots 23 to meet design requirements. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to have modified second series of slots N17B-05 / first series of slots N17B-01 in the battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900 of NISHINO with second series of slots 11 / first series of slots 23 as taught in the tray 10, 20 for loading a battery cap 30 of LEE to meet design requirements. PNG media_image1.png 383 656 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 322 631 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 472 671 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 325 665 media_image4.png Greyscale PNG media_image5.png 492 616 media_image5.png Greyscale PNG media_image6.png 453 710 media_image6.png Greyscale PNG media_image7.png 592 700 media_image7.png Greyscale PNG media_image8.png 554 677 media_image8.png Greyscale PNG media_image9.png 491 730 media_image9.png Greyscale PNG media_image10.png 704 676 media_image10.png Greyscale PNG media_image11.png 567 599 media_image11.png Greyscale PNG media_image12.png 432 728 media_image12.png Greyscale PNG media_image13.png 200 792 media_image13.png Greyscale PNG media_image14.png 515 470 media_image14.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, NISHINO and LEE (as applied to claim 1 above) teaches all the limitations of the claim. NISHINO further teaches (see FIG. 2A, FIG. 2B, FIG. 5A, FIG. 5B, FIG. 7A, FIG. 9A, FIG. 13A, FIG. 14A, FIG. 14B, FIG. 15 above) battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900, wherein the battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900 is configured to stack (FIG. 15) with an additional tray 1800, 1900 of an identical configuration by nesting the top side N17B-02 of the battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900 with a bottom side N17B-06 of the additional tray 1800, 1900. Regarding claim 3, NISHINO and LEE (as applied to claim 2 above) teaches all the limitations of the claim. NISHINO further teaches (see FIG. 2A, FIG. 2B, FIG. 5A, FIG. 5B, FIG. 7A, FIG. 9A, FIG. 13A, FIG. 14A, FIG. 14B, FIG. 15 above) battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900, wherein, when stacked with the additional tray 1800, 1900, the first series of slots N17B-01 together with an additional series of slots on the bottom side N17B-06 of the additional tray 1800, 1900 provide full enclosures (FIG. 15) for a plurality of battery cells N17B-04, N17B-07. Regarding claim 4, NISHINO and LEE (as applied to claim 1 above) teaches all the limitations of the claim. NISHINO further teaches (see FIG. 2A, FIG. 2B, FIG. 5A, FIG. 5B, FIG. 7A, FIG. 9A, FIG. 13A, FIG. 14A, FIG. 14B, FIG. 15 above) battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900, wherein the first series of slots N17B-01 is configured to receive a first plurality N17B-04 of vertically oriented battery cells N17B-04, N17B-07. Regarding claim 5, NISHINO and LEE (as applied to claim 1 above) teaches all the limitations of the claim. NISHINO further teaches (see FIG. 2A, FIG. 2B, FIG. 5A, FIG. 5B, FIG. 7A, FIG. 9A, FIG. 13A, FIG. 14A, FIG. 14B, FIG. 15 above) battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900, further comprising an overhang N14B-01 at least partially around a perimeter of the battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900, the overhang N14B-01 configured to overlap a portion of an additional tray 1800, 1900 when the battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900 is stacked with the additional tray 1800, 1900. Regarding claim 6, NISHINO and LEE (as applied to claim 1 above) teaches all the limitations of the claim. NISHINO further teaches (see FIG. 2A, FIG. 2B, FIG. 5A, FIG. 5B, FIG. 7A, FIG. 9A, FIG. 13A, FIG. 14A, FIG. 14B, FIG. 15 above) battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900, further comprising a cavity N14B-02 at an end of the first slot N17B-03 of the first series of slots N17B-01, the cavity N14B-02 configured to receive a terminal of the first battery cell N17B-04. Regarding claim 7, NISHINO and LEE (as applied to claim 6 above) teaches all the limitations of the claim. NISHINO fails to teach (see FIG. 2A, FIG. 2B, FIG. 5A, FIG. 5B, FIG. 7A, FIG. 9A, FIG. 13A, FIG. 14A, FIG. 14B, FIG. 15 above) battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900, further comprising a shelf between the cavity N14B-02 and the first slot N17B-03. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified cavity N14B-02 / first slot N17B-03 in the battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900 of NISHINO and LEE to comprise a shelf since a change in form or shape is generally recognized as being within the level of ordinary skill in the art, absent any showing of unexpected results. In re Dailey et al., 149 USPQ47. Regarding claim 8, NISHINO and LEE (as applied to claim 1 above) teaches all the limitations of the claim. NISHINO further teaches (see FIG. 2A, FIG. 2B, FIG. 5A, FIG. 5B, FIG. 7A, FIG. 9A, FIG. 13A, FIG. 14A, FIG. 14B, FIG. 15 above) battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900, further comprising a single-layer barrier 1920 between the first slot N17B-03 of the first series of slots N17B-01 and the second slot N17B-08 of the second series of slots N17B-05. NISHINO fails to teach single-layer barrier 1920 is a double-layer barrier. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to have modified single-layer barrier 1920 in the battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900 of NISHINO and LEE to comprise a double-layer barrier for securement purposes. Moreover, duplication of parts has no patentable significance unless a new and unexpected result is produced. In reHarza, 274 F.2d 669, 124 USPQ 378 (CCPA 1960). Regarding claim 9, NISHINO and LEE (as applied to claim 1 above) teaches all the limitations of the claim. NISHINO further teaches (see FIG. 2A, FIG. 2B, FIG. 5A, FIG. 5B, FIG. 7A, FIG. 9A, FIG. 13A, FIG. 14A, FIG. 14B, FIG. 15 above) battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900, wherein the second series of slots N17B-05 is longitudinally aligned with the first series of slots N17B-01. Regarding claim 10, NISHINO and LEE (as applied to claim 1 above) teaches all the limitations of the claim. NISHINO further teaches (see FIG. 2A, FIG. 2B, FIG. 5A, FIG. 5B, FIG. 7A, FIG. 9A, FIG. 13A, FIG. 14A, FIG. 14B, FIG. 15 above) battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900, further comprising an electrolyte-corrosive-resistant polymer material (page 22, para. [0066], lines 1-4, “… resin …”). Claim(s) 14, 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nishino et al. (U. S. Patent Application Publication US20100330404A1) hereinafter NISHINO. Regarding claim 14, NISHINO (as applied to claim 13 below) teaches all the limitations of the claim. NISHINO further teaches (see FIG. 2A, FIG. 2B, FIG. 5A, FIG. 5B, FIG. 7A, FIG. 9A, FIG. 13A, FIG. 14A, FIG. 14B, FIG. 15 above) battery cell storage and transportation system 1800, 1900, wherein the second battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900 comprises a single-layer barrier 1920 between a second slot N17B-08 of the second plurality of slots N17B-05 and an adjacent slot on a bottom side N17B-06 of the second battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900, the adjacent slot corresponding to a first slot N17B-03 of the first plurality of slots N17B-01 of the first battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900. NISHINO fails to teach single-layer barrier 1920 is a double-layer barrier. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to have modified single-layer barrier 1920 in the battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900 of NISHINO to comprise a double-layer barrier for securement purposes. Moreover, duplication of parts has no patentable significance unless a new and unexpected result is produced. In reHarza, 274 F.2d 669, 124 USPQ 378 (CCPA 1960). Regarding claim 16, NISHINO (as applied to claim 15 below) teaches all the limitations of the claim. NISHINO fails to teach (see FIG. 2A, FIG. 2B, FIG. 5A, FIG. 5B, FIG. 7A, FIG. 9A, FIG. 13A, FIG. 14A, FIG. 14B, FIG. 15 above) battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900, further comprising a shelf between the cavity N14B-02 and the first slot N17B-03. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified cavity N14B-02 / first slot N17B-03 in the battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900 of NISHINO to comprise a shelf since a change in form or shape is generally recognized as being within the level of ordinary skill in the art, absent any showing of unexpected results. In re Dailey et al., 149 USPQ47. Claim(s) 19-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over NISHINO, in view of Wei (China Patent CN215285931U) hereinafter WEI. Regarding claim 19, NISHINO (as applied to claim 11 below) teaches all the limitations of the claim. NISHINO fails to teach (see FIG. 2A, FIG. 2B, FIG. 5A, FIG. 5B, FIG. 7A, FIG. 9A, FIG. 13A, FIG. 14A, FIG. 14B, FIG. 15 above) battery cell storage and transportation system 1800, 1900, further comprising a belt configured to secure the first battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900 and the second battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900 together. However, WEI teaches (see FIG. 1 - FIG. 2 below) packaging system 1, further comprising a belt 19 configured to secure the first packaging carton 1 and the second packaging carton 1 together for securement purposes. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to have modified battery cell storage and transportation system 1800, 1900 of NISHINO with packaging system 1 of WEI for securement purposes. PNG media_image15.png 560 816 media_image15.png Greyscale PNG media_image16.png 424 764 media_image16.png Greyscale Regarding claim 20, NISHINO and WEI (as applied to claim 19 above) teaches all the limitations of the claim. The combination of NISHINO (see FIG. 2A, FIG. 2B, FIG. 5A, FIG. 5B, FIG. 7A, FIG. 9A, FIG. 13A, FIG. 14A, FIG. 14B, FIG. 15 above) and WEI teaches (see FIG. 1 - FIG. 2 above) further teaches battery cell storage and transportation system 1800, 1900, wherein, when the first battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900 and the second battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900 are secured together, the battery cell storage and transportation system 1800, 1900 comprises a single palletized unit. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 11-13, 15, 17-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Nishino et al. (U. S. Patent Application Publication US20100330404A1) hereinafter NISHINO. Regarding claim 11, NISHINO teaches (see FIG. 2A, FIG. 2B, FIG. 5A, FIG. 5B, FIG. 7A, FIG. 9A, FIG. 13A, FIG. 14A, FIG. 14B, FIG. 15 above) a battery cell storage and transportation system 1800, 1900 comprising: a first battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900 configured to hold a first plurality N17B-04 of battery cells N17B-04, N17B-07; and a second battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900 configured to hold a second plurality of battery cells N17B-04, N17B-07, and configured to be stacked on top of the first battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900 and enclose the first plurality N17B-04 of battery cells N17B-04, N17B-07 such that the first plurality N17B-04 of battery cells N17B-04, N17B-07 vertically overlap with the second plurality of battery cells N17B-04, N17B-07. Regarding claim 12, NISHINO teaches (see FIG. 2A, FIG. 2B, FIG. 5A, FIG. 5B, FIG. 7A, FIG. 9A, FIG. 13A, FIG. 14A, FIG. 14B, FIG. 15 above) battery cell storage and transportation system 1800, 1900, wherein, when the first and second battery cell storage and transportation trays 1800, 1900 are loaded respectively with the first and second pluralities of battery cells N17B-04, N17B-07, the first plurality N17B-04 of battery cells N17B-04, N17B-07 is laterally staggered from the second plurality of battery cells N17B-04, N17B-07. Regarding claim 13, NISHINO teaches (see FIG. 2A, FIG. 2B, FIG. 5A, FIG. 5B, FIG. 7A, FIG. 9A, FIG. 13A, FIG. 14A, FIG. 14B, FIG. 15 above) battery cell storage and transportation system 1800, 1900, wherein, the first battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900 comprises a first plurality of slots N17B-01 to receive the first plurality N17B-04 of battery cells N17B-04, N17B-07, and wherein the second battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900 comprises a second plurality of slots N17B-05 to receive the second plurality of battery cells N17B-04, N17B-07. Regarding claim 15, NISHINO teaches (see FIG. 2A, FIG. 2B, FIG. 5A, FIG. 5B, FIG. 7A, FIG. 9A, FIG. 13A, FIG. 14A, FIG. 14B, FIG. 15 above) battery cell storage and transportation system 1800, 1900, wherein the first battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900 comprises a cavity N14B-02 at an end of a first slot N17B-03 of the first plurality of slots N17B-01, the cavity N14B-02 configured to receive a terminal of a first battery cell N17B-04 of the first plurality N17B-04 of battery cells N17B-04, N17B-07. Regarding claim 17, NISHINO teaches (see FIG. 2A, FIG. 2B, FIG. 5A, FIG. 5B, FIG. 7A, FIG. 9A, FIG. 13A, FIG. 14A, FIG. 14B, FIG. 15 above) battery cell storage and transportation system 1800, 1900, wherein: the first battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900 comprises a first configuration, the second battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900 comprises a second configuration identical to the first configuration, and the second battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900 is configured to be stacked on top of the first battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900 in an opposite orientation of the first battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900. Regarding claim 18, NISHINO teaches (see FIG. 2A, FIG. 2B, FIG. 5A, FIG. 5B, FIG. 7A, FIG. 9A, FIG. 13A, FIG. 14A, FIG. 14B, FIG. 15 above) battery cell storage and transportation system 1800, 1900, wherein the second battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900 comprises an overhang N14B-01 configured to overlap a portion of the first battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900 when stacked on top of the first battery cell storage and transportation tray 1800, 1900. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Wei et al. (China Patent Application Publication CN117401277A): Teaches an “assembly” with similar characteristics as the claimed invention. Sun et al. (China Paten CN218464430U): Teaches a “packaging” with similar characteristics as the claimed invention. Ohta (U. S. Patent Application Publication US20230395914A1): Teaches a “tray” with similar characteristics as the claimed invention. Contact Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARCOS JAVIER RODRIGUEZ MOLINA whose telephone number is (571) 272-8947. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 7:30 AM to 5:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ANTHONY D. STASHICK can be reached on (571) 272-4561. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /M.J.R.M./ /Anthony D Stashick/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3735
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 22, 2025
Application Filed
Mar 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600537
DISPENSING CLOSURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595098
FLUID SAMPLE CONTAINER CAP
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12576313
Device to Releasably Secure Pickleballs
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12570455
PROTECTIVE BRACKET AND USING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12565365
SOLVENT TUBE MANAGEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
52%
Grant Probability
77%
With Interview (+25.5%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 145 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month