Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/034,458

OUTDOOR UMBRELLA WITH DETACHABLE RIBS AND TRAY

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jan 22, 2025
Priority
Dec 25, 2024 — CN 202423206500.9
Examiner
HAWK, NOAH CHANDLER
Art Unit
3636
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Zhejiang Tianji Leisure Products Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
960 granted / 1562 resolved
+9.5% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
59 currently pending
Career history
1625
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
42.4%
+2.4% vs TC avg
§102
32.1%
-7.9% vs TC avg
§112
23.9%
-16.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1562 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 6 recites “the locking portion” which renders the claim indefinite. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. For the purposes of examination, Claim 6 will be treated as depending from Claim 5 where the locking portion is introduced. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4, and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Chen in US Patent 6802329. Regarding Claim 1, Chen teaches an outdoor umbrella with detachable ribs and tray, the outdoor umbrella comprising a tray (20/30) and ribs (141/142), wherein one end of each of the ribs is provided with an assembly seat (212/213), a plurality of assembly slots (22) are formed on the tray, and the assembly seat is embedded in a corresponding one of the assembly slots in a snap-fitted manner (see Fig. 7); and the outdoor umbrella further comprises end sealing covers (33), the end sealing covers are configured to fixedly match the tray, and the end sealing covers are configured to seal the assembly seat in the corresponding one of the assembly slots. Regarding Claim 2, Chen teaches that the assembly seat comprises a rib assembly portion (212) and a snap-in embedding portion (213), wherein the snap-in embedding portion is configured to fit the assembly slot in a snap-in embedding manner, and the rib is in hinged fit with the rib assembly portion (see Fig. 1). Regarding Claim 3, Chen teaches that the assembly slot comprises an accommodating slot (the narrow portion) and a dovetail slot (the wide inner portion), the rib assembly portion is configured to correspondingly match the accommodating slot, and the snap-in embedding portion is configured to correspondingly match the dovetail slot. Regarding Claim 4, Chen teaches that the snap-in embedding portion and the dovetail slot form a mortise and tenon joint structure (see Fig. 7). Regarding Claim 7, Chen teaches that the tray comprises an upper tray (20) and a lower tray (30), the ribs comprise long ribs (141) and short ribs (142), one end of each of the long ribs is configured for matched mounting with the upper tray, and the other end thereof extends outward; and one end of each of the short ribs is configured for matched mounting with the lower tray, and the other end thereof is configured for matched mounting with a corresponding one of the long ribs (see Fig. 1). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5 and 8-10 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 6 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Lichtenstein, Clarke, Lai,. Beaulieu, and Zhu teach Umbrellas with detachable ribs. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NOAH C. HAWK whose telephone number is (571)272-1480. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am to 5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Dunn can be reached at 5712726670. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. NOAH C. HAWK Primary Examiner Art Unit 3636 /Noah C. Hawk/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3636
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 22, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703992
SUN SHADING SYSTEMS
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12702206
PORTABLE SUSPENDED INVERTED UMBRELLA WITH QUICK RELEASE FABRIC
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12691026
CONVENIENTLY STORED WALKING AID
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12680331
CARBON FIBER ROOFTOP TENT
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677916
Electric Umbrella
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+22.2%)
1y 11m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1562 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month