Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 19/034,880

THEFT DETERRENT SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 23, 2025
Priority
Jan 23, 2024 — provisional 63/624,095
Examiner
KRYCINSKI, STANTON L
Art Unit
3631
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Sennco Solutions Inc.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
690 granted / 1014 resolved
+16.0% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
1039
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
70.5%
+30.5% vs TC avg
§102
6.1%
-33.9% vs TC avg
§112
22.0%
-18.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1014 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Claim Objections Claims 19 and 26 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 19, it appears “multiple bends form two bridges” should read --the one or more bends include multiple bends forming two bridges-- to refer back to the bends recited in claim 12 Claim 26, line 3, it appears “a closed position” should read --the closed position-- to correspond with claim 1 Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In regards to claim 8, it is unclear if “a channel fence” in line 2 is the same or different than the separate channel fence recited in line 6 of claim 1. Appropriate explanation or correction is required. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. In particular, Applicant’s amendments raise 35 USC 112 issues as discussed above. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 3, 5-7, 9-12, 14, 15, 17 and 19-26 are allowed. Claim 8 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The closest prior art of record is discussed in the previous Office action on the merits. The prior art of record does not anticipate or make obvious a theft deterrent system having the combination of structural and functional limitations of Applicant’s claimed invention. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STANTON L KRYCINSKI whose telephone number is (571)270-5381. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 10:00AM-5:00PM ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Liu can be reached at (571)272-8227. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Stanton L Krycinski/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3631
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 23, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Apr 14, 2026
Response Filed
May 07, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12622535
MERCHANDISE ACCESS GATE AND RETAIL MERCHANDISE DISPLAY INCLUDING MERCHANDISE ACCESS GATE
3y 2m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12617627
SELECTIVELY SECURABLE ROLLER TRACK
2y 3m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12604998
Collapsible Display Bench
1y 8m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12588759
RETAINING BRACKET FOR MODULAR SHELVING UNIT
3y 0m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589840
ELECTRICALLY ACTUATED WATERSPORTS BOARD RACKS AND RELATED METHODS
1y 7m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+28.4%)
2y 2m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1014 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month