Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 19/036,310

RETRIEVABLE BRIDGE PLUG WITH DUAL CHECK VALVES

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Jan 24, 2025
Priority
Jan 24, 2024 — provisional 63/624,602
Examiner
THOMPSON, KENNETH L
Art Unit
3676
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Tier 1 Energy Solutions, Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
1029 granted / 1177 resolved
+35.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1193
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
29.0%
-11.0% vs TC avg
§102
52.5%
+12.5% vs TC avg
§112
11.5%
-28.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1177 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Smith, U.S. 3,316,969. Smith discloses in figures 1 and 2 a retrievable bridge plug (col. 5, lines 31) having an expandable packer (sealing ring; 53; col. 3, lines 60-65) mechanism to seal to a casing and a slip (slip segments 60) mechanism to anchor to the casing, and defining a flow path (interior bore 35a; col. 3, lines 12-16) through the bridge plug which includes a check valve (check valve 40, shaped port 39; col. 3, lines 4-5 restricts flow by diversion to the piston 44; col. 3, lines 50-54, and setting ball 72 or valve restricting flow through bore 35a; col. 3, lines 41-44) for restricting fluid flow through the bridge plug (col. 3, lines 66- 67). Smith discloses two check valves (check valve 40 and dropped ball 72) arranged sequentially (40 is above 72). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2, 4-6 and 11-15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 15 June 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicants argue Smith reference fails to disclose a device with a flow path through the device, and a check valve which restricts flow through the device because the check valve is not configured to restrict fluid flow through the device itself, the check valve 40 is a valve which restricts fluid flow to the chamber which actuates piston 44. The reference discloses a one-way ball valve 72 that restricts flow through the bore 35a and the check valve 40 restricts flow through the bore by diverting flow to the piston chamber. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KENNETH L THOMPSON whose telephone number is (571)272-7037. The examiner can normally be reached Weekdays; 9:00-5:00, est. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tara Schimpf can be reached at 571-270-7741. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. 30 June 2026 /KENNETH L THOMPSON/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3676
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 24, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jun 15, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12698705
DOWNHOLE FRACTURING ZONE DATA LOGGER AND DOWNHOLE FRACTURING ZONE DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEM
1y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12698687
TWO-STAGE MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION SCHEME FOR WELLBORE CLEANUP WITH AN EMISSIONS MEASURE
1y 0m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12687246
SEALING DEVICES AND RELATED METHODS FOR OIL AND GAS APPLICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12669020
COILED TUBING SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GEOTHERMAL WELLS
1y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12662910
Detecting Mineralization And Monitoring Greenhouse Gas Plume Location In Subterranean Formations
1y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+7.1%)
2y 5m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1177 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month