Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 19/036,950

MOBILE, SOLAR POWERED POWER STATION SYSTEM

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jan 24, 2025
Examiner
BUKHARI, AQEEL H
Art Unit
2849
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
2 (Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
539 granted / 630 resolved
+17.6% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
668
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
43.1%
+3.1% vs TC avg
§102
35.4%
-4.6% vs TC avg
§112
12.4%
-27.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 630 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-6 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 3-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Carpoff (US2012/0206087 A1) in view of Stuart et al. (US 2003/0070708 A1) further in view of Nicholson et al. (US 20180144628 A1). Regarding claim 1 Carpoff teaches a solar panel system, comprising: a trailer; [see (Fig. 1; para. 0003) a standalone portable solar power system includes a trailer teaches trailer]; a solar panel array disposed on the trailer; [see (Fig. 1-3; para. 0003) solar panels mounted on rotating beams teaches solar panels mounted on trailer]; a pole disposed on the trailer and having the solar panel array rotatably mounted thereon, wherein the pole is extendable and the solar panel [see (Fig. 1-3; para. 0004) vertical posts… rotatable horizontal beams… solar panels can be rotated teaches pole/post with rotatable mounting, teaches a pole with rotation]; a plurality of batteries disposed on the trailer and in communication with the solar panel array; [see (Fig. 1; para. 0003) the frame can support a plurality of rechargeable batteries teaches batteries]; a plurality of electrical outlets in communication with the plurality of batteries and in communication with the solar panel array; [see (Fig. 1; para. 0003) an inverter and a power outlet teaches electrical outlet]; Carpoff does not expressly teach wherein the pole is extendable and the solar panel is rotatable about the pole about at least two axes; a crank shaft mechanically connected to the pole and mechanically connected to the solar panel array, wherein the crank shaft can adjust an extension of the pole and an orientation of the solar panel array; and an artificial intelligence control system configured to position the solar panel array based on a positioning of the sun and a geographical positioning of the solar panel array, wherein the artificial intelligence control system is configured to automatically bring down the solar panel array when no sunlight is detected or when the plurality of batteries are completely charged. In an analogous art Stuart teaches wherein the pole is extendable and the solar panel is rotatable about the pole about at least two axes; [see (Fig. 1-2; paras. 0022-0024) main mast 30… first and second main mast members 32, 34… a conventional crank assembly 36… for manually cranking the solar panel 26 up and down, and coupling 40 permitting movement about two axes teaches extendable mast and two-axis movement, Stuart’s main mast with crank assembly corresponds to an extendable pole, and the coupling permitting movement about two axes corresponds to rotation about at least two axes ]; a crank shaft mechanically connected to the pole and mechanically connected to the solar panel array, wherein the crank shaft can adjust an extension of the pole and an orientation of the solar panel array; [see (paras. 0027-0028) a threaded rod 50… a handle 56… as each rod is turned, it raises or lowers a portion of the solar panel, providing tilting and pivoting, and para. 0023 main mast 30… provided with a conventional crank assembly 36… for manually cranking the solar panel 26 up and down teaches crank-type threaded rod/jackscrew mechanisms; Stuart teaches crank-type jackscrew mechanisms (threaded rods with handles and mast crank assembly) that adjust both elevation and orientation. A POSITA would recognize these as functional equivalents of a crank shaft mechanically linking the support pole and the panel]. Therefore, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use the adjustable mast and crank-type jackscrew mechanism of Stuart in the invention of Carpoff to enable adjustment of panel height and multi-axis orientation, thereby improving solar energy capture with predictable results. Combination of Carpoff and Stuart doesn’t expressly teach an artificial intelligence control system configured to position the solar panel array based on a positioning of the sun and a geographical positioning of the solar panel array, wherein the artificial intelligence control system is configured to automatically bring down the solar panel array when no sunlight is detected or when the plurality of batteries are completely charged. In an analogous art Nicholson teaches an artificial intelligence control system configured to position the solar panel array based on a positioning of the sun and a geographical positioning of the solar panel array, wherein the artificial intelligence control system is configured to automatically bring down the solar panel array when no sunlight is detected or when the plurality of batteries are completely charged; [see (Fig. 8; paras. 0064-0068) determine GPS data… determine a point of aim… compute a height and angle of rotation… adjust the sign orientation accordingly, and (paras. 0036-0037, 0052-0054) controller… lowers the sign portion to a lowest height in response to wind conditions or power state… may automatically perform shutdown or power save operations teaches automatic positioning and lowering based on conditions; Nicholson teaches a controller that determines location and environmental conditions and automatically adjusts orientation, including lowering the structure under certain conditions (e.g., wind or power state). It would have been obvious to configure such a controller to lower the solar panel array when no useful sunlight is available or when batteries are fully charged as a routine safety and efficiency optimization]. Therefore, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use the automated control system based on environmental and positional inputs of Nicholson in the invention of Carpoff as modified by Stuart to automatically position and adjust the solar panel array, and, consistent with Nicholson’s teaching of lowering the structure in response to sensed conditions, to further program the controller to lower the array when no useful sunlight is available or when the batteries are fully charged, thereby reducing manual intervention, mechanical stress, and unnecessary operation with predictable results. Regarding claim 3, Combination of Carpoff, Stuart and Nicholson teaches the invention set forth above, regarding wherein the plurality of batteries are configured to provide power to an external structure [Carpoff teaches a power outlet connected to the battery and inverter system (para. 0003): providing a power outlet inherently enables supplying electrical power to external loads connected via the outlet, which corresponds to providing power to an external structure]. Regarding claim 4, Combination of Carpoff, Stuart and Nicholson teaches the invention set forth above, regarding wherein the artificial intelligence control system is configured to detect an obstruction of sunlight and position the solar panel array away from the obstruction of sunlight; [ Nicholson teaches a controller that determines location and environmental conditions (e.g., weather, wind, traffic) and automatically computes and sets an appropriate height and angle of rotation for a structure and its solar panel assembly based on those conditions (see, e.g., Fig. 8; paras. 0055-0057) Nicholson further teaches adjusting and lowering the structure in response to adverse conditions such as wind or power state; environmental conditions affecting positioning include conditions that reduce effectiveness of operation. A POSITA would recognize that obstruction of sunlight is a type of environmental condition affecting solar performance, and it would have been obvious to configure Nicholson’s environment-responsive positioning control to adjust panel orientation to avoid such obstructions, thereby improving solar energy capture]. Therefore, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use the environment-responsive positioning control of Nicholson to adjust panel orientation to avoid obstruction of sunlight, thereby improving energy capture with predictable results. Regarding claim 5, Combination of Carpoff, Stuart and Nicholson teaches the invention set forth above, regarding wherein the plurality of electrical outlets includes six electrical outlets disposed on the trailer and configured to communicate with extension cables; [Carpoff teaches at least one power outlet connected to the system (para. 0003); selecting a particular number of outlets (e.g., six) and enabling connection via extension cables are design choices based on expected electrical load and user requirements]. Therefore, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to provide multiple outlets, including six outlets, and enable connection via extension cables to increase power distribution capability and meet user demand, thereby achieving predictable results. Claim(s) 2 and 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Carpoff (US2012/0206087 A1), in view of Stuart et al. (US 2003/0070708 A1), in view of Nicholson et al. (US 2018/0144628 A1), further in view of Robertson (US 2012/0201016 A1). Regarding claim 2, Carpoff in view of Stuart and Nicholson further in view of Robertson teaches the invention set forth above Regarding wherein the trailer is a two-axle flatbed trailer with a plurality of outriggers the combination doesn’t expressly teach the limitation. In an analogous art Robertson teaches a mobile solar-powered system including a trailer frame having wheels/axles and stabilizing components such as outriggers and jack stands for supporting and stabilizing the trailer during operation [see (Fig. 1-2; paras. 0033, 0048); the trailer frame with wheels corresponds to a multi-axle trailer structure, and the disclosed outriggers/jack stands correspond to a plurality of outriggers used to stabilize the trailer during deployment, which is consistent with a flatbed trailer configuration supporting mounted equipment]. Therefore, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use the trailer and stabilizing outrigger configuration of Robertson in the invention of Carpoff as modified by Stuart and Nicholson to improve stability and load support of the trailer during operation, thereby ensuring safe and reliable deployment with predictable results. Regarding claim 6, Carpoff in view of Stuart and Nicholson further in view of Robertson teaches the invention set forth above; regarding wherein the trailer is a two-axle flatbed trailer including four outriggers, one at each corner, configured to stabilize the trailer the combination doesn’t expressly teach the limitation. In an analogous art Robertson teaches a trailer-based solar system including stabilizing outriggers and jack stands positioned at the trailer to support and stabilize the system during deployment [(see (Fig. 1-2; paras. 0033, 0048); the use of multiple outriggers/jack stands corresponds to providing a plurality of stabilizers, and arranging such stabilizers at distributed positions (e.g., corners of a trailer) is a known and predictable configuration to maximize stability of a rectangular trailer structure]. Therefore, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to arrange four outriggers at the corners of the trailer to maximize stability during operation, thereby improving safety and structural support with predictable results. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Aqeel H Bukhari whose telephone number is (571)272-4382. The examiner can normally be reached M-F (9am to 5pm). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Menna Youssef can be reached at 571-270-3684. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AQEEL H BUKHARI/Examiner, Art Unit 2849 /DANIEL C PUENTES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2849
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 24, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jan 26, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 01, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603496
A POWER SOURCE ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12567608
SYSTEM, PROGRAM, AND MANAGEMENT METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12539768
ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLYING MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12533992
ELECTRIC VEHICLE, AND CONTROL METHOD FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12522076
ELECTRIC VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+15.3%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 630 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month