Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/037,695

CORRECTION METHOD, SYSTEM, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM STORING PROGRAM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 27, 2025
Priority
Jan 26, 2024 — JP 2024-009978
Examiner
KASHYAPA, ANUSHA
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Seiko Epson Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
100%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 100% — above average
100%
Career Allowance Rate
1 granted / 1 resolved
+40.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
12
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.5%
-33.5% vs TC avg
§103
61.0%
+21.0% vs TC avg
§102
15.6%
-24.4% vs TC avg
§112
11.7%
-28.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(2) as being anticipated by US20160182873 (hereinafter referred to as Sumiyoshi). Regarding claim 1, Sumiyoshi teaches A correction method for correcting a projection image projected on a planar surface by a projector, comprising: acquiring a first captured image obtained by imaging of the projection image and the planar surface by an imaging device in a first period [See paragraph 0064 where the acquisition unit obtains a first photographed image of a projected pattern (projected image) image and a projection surface. See also Fig 14 where the projection surface (12) is flat]; PNG media_image1.png 244 1100 media_image1.png Greyscale acquiring a second captured image obtained by imaging of the projection image and the planar surface by the imaging device in a second period after the first period [See paragraph 0064 above where a second image is obtained by photographing the projected image with a second pattern and the projection surface. See also 0065 where the projection apparatus for the first and second photographed image are the same, indicating that that the images were taken at two different times, with the second image being photographed after the first]; PNG media_image2.png 124 1093 media_image2.png Greyscale extracting a first feature point and a second feature point of the planar surface in the first captured image [See 0069 where coordinates are extracted from the first extraction unit and Fig. 32 where a first and second feature point can be obtained from the image] PNG media_image3.png 211 1010 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 516 948 media_image4.png Greyscale extracting a third feature point corresponding to the first feature point and a fourth feature point corresponding to the second feature point of the planar surface in the second captured image [see paragraph 0070 where the feature points are extracted from the second photographed image, and fig 32 above and paragraph 0214, where the feature points between the first and second photographed image correspond and can be taken as a third and fourth feature point]; PNG media_image5.png 158 1010 media_image5.png Greyscale PNG media_image6.png 124 1012 media_image6.png Greyscale calculating a first normal vector as a normal vector of the planar surface in the first period [See paragraph 0149 where from the norm of the vector between feature points, which are projected onto the planar surface, DN is calculated. The DN calculation happens are part of the identifying unit as shown in Fig. 19]; PNG media_image7.png 255 984 media_image7.png Greyscale PNG media_image8.png 697 445 media_image8.png Greyscale calculating a second normal vector as a normal vector of the planar surface in the second period [See paragraph 0145 where the actions performed in the identifying unit are done on both the first feature pints and the second feature points, indicating that the norm is calculated for both time periods]; PNG media_image9.png 139 988 media_image9.png Greyscale and correcting a position of the projection image with respect to the planar surface in the second period to a position of the projection image with respect to the planar surface in the first period based on a set of the first feature point, the second feature point, and the first normal vector and a set of the third feature point, the fourth feature point, and the second normal vector [see paragraph 51 where the feature points, and the norm vectors (calculated as part of the image processing apparatus) from both the first and second photographed images are used to correct the position projection image. See also the abstract]. PNG media_image10.png 99 897 media_image10.png Greyscale PNG media_image11.png 275 1020 media_image11.png Greyscale Claim 5 and 6 are similarly analyzed to claim 1. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sumiyoshi in view of KR101273534B1 (hereinafter referred to as Yoon). Regarding claim 4, Sumiyoshi teaches extracting the first and second feature point, and corresponding third and fourth feature point [see paragraph 0214] PNG media_image12.png 124 1012 media_image12.png Greyscale Sumiyoshi does not explicitly teach that the feature points are detachable physical markers that reflect light attached to a planar surface Yoon does teach using removable reflective markers as feature points for projection correction [See description of Yoon paragraph 8 where physical light reflecting markers are placed as feature points as a process to automatically perform screen correction]. PNG media_image13.png 290 1341 media_image13.png Greyscale Therefore, it would have been obvious to one with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to combine the projection correction of Sumiyoshi with using physical feature markers as feature points of Yoon so that the screen correction can be performed automatically. Rather than using projected pattern image as the feature as described in Sumiyoshi, instead, using a physical marker offers another method to perform the correction. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2 and 3 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Contact information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANUSHA KASHYAPA whose telephone number is (571)272-8766. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chan Park can be reached at (571) 272-7409. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANUSHA KASHYAPA/Examiner, Art Unit 2669 /CHAN S PARK/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2669
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 27, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
100%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+0.0%)
2y 4m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month