Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 19/038,166

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR RAILWAY CROSSING DATA

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 27, 2025
Examiner
HUYNH, HAI H
Art Unit
3747
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
93%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 0m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 93% — above average
93%
Career Allow Rate
1154 granted / 1236 resolved
+23.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
1247
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
§103
15.0%
-25.0% vs TC avg
§102
61.1%
+21.1% vs TC avg
§112
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1236 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-2, 6-12, 16-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Makkinejad (2013/0289,805) in view of Kato et al (2015/0094949. Makkinejad teaches a computer with one or more processor and a memory device 315, wherein the computer executes computer-readable instructions for at least one interaction with at least one user device 130, 230, 330; and a network connection 305 operatively connecting the at least one user device 130, 230, 330 to the computer; wherein, upon execution of the computer-readable instructions, the computer is configured to: initiate providing, via a graphical user interface 316 (see [0016]) of the at least one user device , a railway crossing to a user on the at least one user device, wherein the at least one user device is configured to wirelessly communicate 308 with the computer via the railway crossing; receive, via the railway crossing on the at least one user device, railway crossing data 326; store the railway crossing data (see step 506 in figure 5) in at least one database 336; receive, via the railway crossing, at least one railway crossing data request ; (see step 602 in figure 6) and transmit, via the railway crossing, a communication to the at least one user device 130, 230, 330 in response to the at least one railway crossing data request (See figures 2-3, 5-6, [0013]-[0016], [0023]). Makkinejad does not teach an application installation on the user device. Kato et al teach an application installation on the user device (see [0063]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to employ the application of railway crossing install on the user device of Makkinejad as taught by Kato et al in order to avoid distraction from making phone call requesting the railway crossing data while operating the vehicle. For claims 2, 12 receive railway crossing data from a railway crossing device and/or a third party source (see Makkinejad [0018]). For claims 6, 16 transmit another communication to the at least one user device when a change in the previously transmitted railway crossing data has occurred (see Makkinejad [0018]). For claims 7, 17 communication with or includes a vehicle navigation system (see Makkinejad [0017]). For claims 8, 18 the communication is received via the graphical user interface of the at least one user device (see Makkinejad [0016]). For claims 9, 19 communication is a graphical communication displayed on the graphical user interface of the at least one user device (see Makkinejad [0016]). For claims 10, 20 the railway crossing data comprises a railway crossing status (see Makkinejad [0021]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-5, 13-15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HAI H HUYNH whose telephone number is (571)272-4844. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:00 AM-4:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lindsay M Low can be reached at 571-272-1196. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HAI H HUYNH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3747
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 27, 2025
Application Filed
Mar 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600294
TANKER TRUCK WITH REAR LIGHTING ASSEMBLY AND METHOD OF OPERATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600346
BRAKE-TO-STEER LATERAL STABILITY MANAGEMENT BASED ON STABILITY INDICATOR CORRELATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600328
Trailer Vehicle Control System
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589656
TRAILER BRAKE GAIN BASED ON REGENERATIVE BRAKE CAPACITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583398
Positioning Assist Device and Positioning Assist Method
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
93%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+6.8%)
2y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1236 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month