Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/038,390

FISHING LURE RETRIEVER

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Jan 27, 2025
Examiner
WONG, JESSICA BOWEN
Art Unit
3644
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Gregory Connelly
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allow Rate
369 granted / 554 resolved
+14.6% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
598
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
41.5%
+1.5% vs TC avg
§102
17.5%
-22.5% vs TC avg
§112
33.6%
-6.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 554 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Upon further consideration, the previous requirement for restriction is withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claim 9-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 9, the differentiation/relation between the semi-circular opening and “passage” of claim 1 is unclear. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-2 and 4-16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Reimer US 2018/0064087 in view of Nordhagen US 3,861,071. Regarding claim 1, Reimer teaches an apparatus for retrieving fishing lures comprising: an elongate body having a passage therethrough extending between first and second ends and having first and second sides (12 figure 1), the elongate body comprising a base portion (16) extending along a base plane and a tapered portion (14) oriented relative to the base plane to the first side; and a retaining ring extending away from the first side of the base portion (22); but does not specify the tapered portion oriented angularly relative to the base plane. Nordhagen; however, does teach such an angular orientation (near 23). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to provide such an angle, in order to enhance lure capture, as demonstrated by Nordhagen. Regarding claim 2, the references teach the apparatus of claim 1 wherein Nordhagen further teaches the retaining ring comprises a split ring (27/28). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to provide such a ring, in order to enhance lure capture, as demonstrated by Nordhagen. Regarding claim 4, the references teach the apparatus of claim 1 wherein Reimer further teaches the retaining ring extends substantially orthogonally from the base portion (figure 2). Regarding claim 5, the references teach the apparatus of claim 1 wherein Reimer further teaches the retaining ring is secured to a base member proximate to the first end of the elongate body (20). Regarding claim 6, the references teach the apparatus of claim 1 wherein Reimer further teaches the retaining ring comprises a continuous member extending perpendicularly from base portion and transitioning to a circular portion (figures 1-2). Regarding claim 7, the references teach the apparatus of claim 1 wherein Reimer further teaches the elongate body includes a connector at the first end thereof connectable to a retrieval line (36/34/38 figures 3-5). Regarding claim 8, the references teach the apparatus of claim 7 wherein Reimer further teaches the connector comprises a tab extending therefrom with a bore therethrough (figures 3-4). Regarding claim 9, the references teach the apparatus of claim 1 wherein Reimer further teaches the base portion comprises a semi-circular body forming a semi-circular opening through the elongate body (figures 3-4). Regarding claim 10, the references teach the apparatus of claim 9 wherein Reimer further teaches the base portion comprises a base member and two side bodies extending thereform to the tapered proportion (figures 3-4). Regarding claim 11, the references teach the apparatus of claim 10 wherein Reimer further teaches the tapered portion is formed of a pair of side taper members converging to a distal end (figures 3-4). Regarding claim 12, the references teach the apparatus of claim 11 wherein Reimer further teaches the base portion has a substantially circular cross section (figure 2). Regarding claim 13, the references teach the apparatus of claim 11 wherein Nordhagen further teaches the tapered portion includes an upward curvature towards the first side (figure 1). Regarding claim 14, the references teach the apparatus of claim 13 wherein Reimer further teaches the tapered portion is formed of a member having a substantially circular cross section (figure 2). Regarding claim 15, the references teach the apparatus of claim 10 but do not specify wherein the member forming the tapered portion tapers in cross section towards the second end of the elongate member. However, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to provide such a shape, in order to enhance lure capture, as suggested by Nordhagen’s tapered ends 24. Regarding claim 16, the references teach a method for retrieving fishing lures comprising: locating a fishing line within a passage of an elongate body extending between first and second ends, the elongate body comprising a base portion extending along a base plane and a tapered portion angularly oriented relative to the base plane to a first side thereof; locating the fishing line within a retaining ring extending to the first side of the base portion; permitting the elongate body to move down the fishing line to a stuck fishing lure at a distal end thereof; and pulling the elongate body with retrieval line secured thereto (see previous rejections). Claim(s) 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Reimer and Nordhagen in view of Bray US 2,397,916. Regarding claim 3, the references teach the apparatus of claim 2 wherein Nordhagen further teaches the split ring overlaps itself at a distal end for introduction of a fishing line thereinto (figure 1); but do not specify a gap between coils. Bray; however, does teach such a gap (9b figure 2). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to provide such a gap, in order to enhance hook/lure capture functions, as suggested by Bray. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JESSICA WONG whose telephone number is (571)272-7889. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday from 8:00am to 4:30pm MST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy Collins can be reached at (571)272-6886. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JESSICA B WONG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3644
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 27, 2025
Application Filed
Nov 15, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595056
WINCH ASSEMBLIES FOR UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE DELIVERY SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12575506
Potted Plant Stabilizing Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12575540
FEED LIFT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12568929
PET BED WITH COVER COMPRISING AN INTERNAL PARTITION FOR SEPARATING A BASE CUSHION FROM A TOP CUSHION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12564181
CONTAINER FOR AQUATIC LIVE BAIT WITH DETACHABLE AIR PUMP UNIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+21.0%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 554 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month