Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/038,516

POWER TRANSMISSION APPARATUS, POWER RECEIVING APPARATUS, WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM, AND CONTROL METHODS THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 27, 2025
Examiner
DEBERADINIS, ROBERT L
Art Unit
2836
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
828 granted / 967 resolved
+17.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
980
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
41.0%
+1.0% vs TC avg
§102
33.2%
-6.8% vs TC avg
§112
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 967 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by PARK et al. US20230261696. CLAIMS 1,7 PARK et al. discloses a device and method for performing authentication in wireless power transmission system wherein he discloses: a power receiving apparatus comprising: a receiving unit configured to receive a digital ping from a power transmission apparatus (claim 1, a pink phase); a transmission unit configured to transmit, after receiving the digital ping, a packet (claim 1, configuration packet) indicating configuration information of the power receiving apparatus, the configuration information including information indicating whether authentication functionality is supported by the power receiving apparatus (claim 1, authentication function); a negotiation unit configured to negotiate with a power transmission apparatus after receiving an acknowledgment for the packet from the power transmission apparatus (claim 1, negotiation phase); and an authentication unit configured to perform processing of authentication in a case where the power transmission apparatus supports the authentication (claim 1, authentication request). Claims 2,3,8 PARK et al. discloses: The power receiving apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the authentication unit transmits, in the processing of the authentication, a packet of GET_CERTIFICATE defined in WPC (Wireless Power Consortium) standard to the power transmission apparatus. [0330] Thereafter, in order to obtain a certificate chain of the wireless power transmitting device, the wireless power receiving device transmits GET_CERTIFICATE to the wireless power transmitting device (S1810). Here, the GET_CERTIFICATE may be set by an offset and a length. The GET_CERTIFICATE is used for reading a segment of a target certificate chain. CLAIMS 4,9 PARK et al. discloses: The power receiving apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the digital ping is a ping to wake up the power receiving apparatus. The digital pink is inherently is a wakeup call since the packet indicating configuration is sent to the transmitter indicating the receiver is ready to receive power. CLAIM 5 PARK et al. discloses: The power receiving apparatus according to claim 1, wherein information indicating whether the authentication functionality is supported is stored in bit 6 of bank 2 of a configuration packet defined in WPC (Wireless Power Consortium) standard. [0275] The certificate type is configured with, for example, 6 bits, may represent that the corresponding certificate is any one of a root certificate/intermediate certificate/leaf certificate, represent a certificate of the wireless power transmitting device or a certificate of the wireless power receiving device, and represent all of two information. CLAIM 6 PARK et al. discloses: The power receiving apparatus according to claim 1, wherein information indicating that the authentication functionality is supported is "1", and the information indicating that the authentication functionality is not supported is "0". [0012] In another aspect, the target device may be a wireless power receiving device, the first packet may be a configuration packet of the wireless power receiving device, and the indication information may be configured with 1 bit and may indicate support or non-support of an authentication function of the wireless power receiving device. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over PARK et al. US 20230261696. CLAIM 10 PARK et al. discloses a method comprising: receive a digital ping from a power transmission apparatus; transmitting, after receiving the digital ping, a packet indicating configuration information of the power receiving apparatus, the configuration information indicating whether authentication functionality is supported by the power receiving apparatus; negotiating with a power transmission apparatus after receiving an acknowledgment for the packet from the power transmission apparatus; and performing processing of authentication in a case where the power transmission apparatus supports the authentication. PARK et al. does not disclose a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing a program for causing a computer to execute the above method. PARK et al. discloses the claimed invention except for programing a computer to execute the above method. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to automate the invention, since it has been held that broadly providing a mechanical or automatic means to replace manual activity which has accomplished the same result involves only routine skill in the art. In re Venner, 120 USPQ 192. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERT L DEBERADINIS whose telephone number is (571)272-2049. The examiner can normally be reached 9 am to 6 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Barnie Rexford can be reached at 571 272 2391. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. January 30, 2026 /ROBERT L DEBERADINIS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2836
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 27, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597775
CONTROL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587125
MODULAR POWER ARRAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583665
MULTIPURPOSE RELOCATABLE STRUCTURE AND LIFTING SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587019
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING ONE OR MORE INVERTERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580413
METHOD FOR PERFORMING A START-UP OF AN OFFSHORE PLANT WITHOUT EXTERNAL ENERGY SOURCES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+9.6%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 967 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month