Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/039,650

IMAGING APPARATUS, IMAGING SYSTEM, IMAGING APPARATUS DRIVING METHOD, AND IMAGING SYSTEM DRIVING METHOD

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Jan 28, 2025
Priority
Mar 01, 2012 — JP 2012-045653 +5 more
Examiner
SPINKS, ANTOINETTE T
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Canon Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
678 granted / 942 resolved
+12.0% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
974
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.4%
-36.6% vs TC avg
§103
53.6%
+13.6% vs TC avg
§102
24.6%
-15.4% vs TC avg
§112
14.1%
-25.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 942 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Response to Amendment The amendment filed on July 28, 2026, in response to the previous Office Action (04/28/2026) is acknowledged and has been entered. Claims 1 is currently pending. Applicant’s amendment overcomes the following objections/rejections in the last Office Action: Objection to Specification Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a) the invention was known or used by others in this country, or patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country, before the invention thereof by the applicant for a patent. (b) the invention was patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country or in public use or on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of application for patent in the United States. Claim(s) 1 rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) and/or 102(b) as being anticipated by Kawai (US 2011/0109776). Regarding claim 1, Kawai discloses an imaging apparatus comprising: a plurality of pixels arrayed in a matrix shape (fig. 7), each including a plurality of photoelectric conversion units (3a, 3b) configured to generate signal charge, and to output a signal based on the signal charge (¶69), wherein the plurality of pixels have a first pixel, a second pixel, and a third pixel (fig. 7), wherein the first pixel (top left) includes a first photoelectric conversion unit (3a/S21) and a second photoelectric conversion unit (3b/S22), wherein the second pixel (top right) includes a third photoelectric conversion unit (3a/S21) and a fourth photoelectric conversion unit (3b/S22), wherein the third pixel (bottom right) includes a fifth photoelectric conversion unit (3a/S21) and a sixth photoelectric conversion unit (3b/S22), wherein the first pixel includes a first microlens (24) arranged corresponding to the plurality of first photoelectric conversion units unit and the second photoelectric conversion unit (figs. 6-7), wherein the second pixel includes a second microlens arranged corresponding to the third photoelectric conversion unit and the fourth photoelectric conversion unit (figs. 6-7), wherein the third pixel includes a third microlens arranged corresponding to the fifth photoelectric conversion unit and the sixth photoelectric conversion unit (figs. 6-7), wherein the first pixel and the second pixel are arranged in a same row, and wherein the first pixel and the third pixel are arranged in a same column (fig. 7). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Contact Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANTOINETTE SPINKS whose telephone number is (571)270-3749. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 7am - 5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Twyler Haskins can be reached at 571-272-7406. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANTOINETTE T SPINKS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2639
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 28, 2025
Application Filed
Apr 17, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jul 28, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12736851
OPTICAL ELEMENT DRIVING MECHANISM
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12739512
CONTROL DEVICE, IMAGING SYSTEM, CONTROL METHOD, AND CONTROL PROGRAM
1y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12732686
IMAGE CAPTURE EYEWEAR WITH CONTEXT-BASED SENDING
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12732706
IMAGE SENSOR, EXPOSURE CONTROL METHOD, CAMERA MODULE, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12726689
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+20.0%)
2y 9m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 942 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month