Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026
Application No. 19/039,800

ARTEFACT REJECTION FROM HEARING AID ACCELEROMETER DATA

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Jan 29, 2025
Priority
Feb 05, 2024 — EU 24155744.6
Examiner
BRINEY III, WALTER F
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Oticon A/S
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
70%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allowance Rate
366 granted / 560 resolved
+5.4% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
618
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
58.9%
+18.9% vs TC avg
§102
25.5%
-14.5% vs TC avg
§112
8.1%
-31.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 560 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
Detailed Action The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . See 35 U.S.C. § 100 (note). Rejections Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 35 U.S.C. § 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claim 15 is rejected because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claim does not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter. Claim 15 is drawn to “computer program instructions which, when the program is executed by a processor of a hearing aid according to claim 1, cause the hearing aid to perform [a sequence of] steps.” Computer programs per se are neither processes, machines, manufactures or compositions of matter. See MPEP § 2106.03. Accordingly, the claimed computer program is not eligible for patenting, and is rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1–14 are allowed. Claims 1 and 14 are independent. Claims 2–13 depend on claim 1, and are allowable for the same reasons. Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed subject matter, and is reproduced below: Claim 1 “1. Hearing aid adapted for being located at or in an ear of a user, the hearing aid comprising: “- a sensor for detecting a movement of the user and/or an orientation of the user's head, “- wherein the sensor comprises an accelerometer configured to provide accelerometer data comprising at least one signal representing said movement and/or orientation in X-, Y-, and Z-axes of an X-Y-Z co-ordinate system, “- wherein the hearing aid is configured to translate the accelerometer data to quantify said movement and/or orientation as counts in said X-, Y-, and Z-axes and to separate lateral head movements defined as counts in said X- and Y-axes and vertical head movements defined as counts in the X- and Z-axes, and “- wherein the hearing aid is configured to determine a motion bias by calculating at least a sample-by-sample minimum of the counts in said X- and Y-axes, and configured to estimate a listening intention of the user based on said motion bias, and “- wherein the hearing aid comprises a processor, and where the hearing aid is configured to set signal processing parameters of the processor based on the estimated listening intention of the user.” Table 1 The basic thrust of the claimed invention is to distinguish lateral and vertical head movements of a user’s head based on accelerometer data gathered in X, Y and Z axes in part by determining a motion bias (i.e., determining whether a user’s head is relatively still or not, which indicates whether the user is focusing on a sound or not) by observing the minimum of sample counts (i.e., quantized acceleration amount) in either the X-axis or the Y-axis. The claimed idea is best described in the Spec. at p. 22, l. 26 -to -p. 24, l. 3, FIG.4 The idea of distinguishing vertical and lateral head movements is described throughout the prior art. See US 2025/0216935 (distinguishing between control head movements (e.g., nodding) and normal head movements (e.g., turning the head)); US 6,498,996 (IMU bias correction). However, the prior art does not fairly describe, teach or suggest the determination of motion bias by taking the minimum of counts in an X-axis and a Y-axis as claimed. For the foregoing reasons, the claims are allowable. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WALTER F BRINEY III whose telephone number is (571)272-7513. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8 am-4:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Carolyn Edwards can be reached at 571-270-7136. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Walter F Briney III/ Walter F Briney IIIPrimary ExaminerArt Unit 2692 7/19/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 29, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707223
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A PERSONALIZED AUDIO SYSTEM
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707181
HEADPHONES
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12686612
ATTACHABLE MICROPHONE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12681685
METHOD OF OUTPUTTING AUDIO SIGNAL AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR PERFORMING THE SAME
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12646495
FEEDBACK CANCELLATION DIVERGENCE PREVENTION
4y 7m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
70%
With Interview (+4.4%)
3y 0m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 560 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month