Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/039,877

WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 29, 2025
Priority
Aug 24, 2022 — continuation of PCTJP2022031799
Examiner
HU, RUI MENG
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 8m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
411 granted / 614 resolved
+6.9% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+24.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
628
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
55.9%
+15.9% vs TC avg
§102
22.3%
-17.7% vs TC avg
§112
15.8%
-24.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 614 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 5-7 and 9-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Choi (US 20170288473 A1). For claim 1. Choi discloses A wireless communication system comprising: a first wireless communication device (figure 4, BS 410); and a second wireless communication device (figure 4, UE 420), wherein the first wireless communication device includes a transmission circuit that transmits an information signal and an energy signal, and a first processor that controls transmission of the information signal and the energy signal ([0064], [0122]-[0124]), the second wireless communication device includes a splitter that branches a received signal from the first wireless communication device and generates a first received signal and a second received signal (figures 5 and 12-14), an energy receiver that rectifies the energy signal included in the first received signal and generates a direct current ([0137]), an information receiver that decodes the information signal included in the second received signal (figures 5 and 12-13), and a second processor that generates control information that includes a request related to transmission power of the information signal and transmission power of the energy signal ([0070]-[0075]), the second wireless communication device transmits the control information to the first wireless communication device ([0070]-[0075], [0099], figure 7), and in the first wireless communication device, the first processor controls the transmission power of the information signal and the transmission power of the energy signal based on the control information ([0070]-[0075], [0110]-[0113], [0131], [0133]). For claim 2. The wireless communication system according to claim 1, Choi discloses wherein the control information includes information that indicates a ratio between the transmission power of the information signal and the transmission power of the energy signal ([0070]-[0075]). For claim 3. The wireless communication system according to claim 1, Choi discloses wherein the control information includes information that indicates a desired value of the transmission power of the information signal and a desired value of the transmission power of the energy signal ([0070]-[0075]). For claim 5. The wireless communication system according to claim 1, Choi discloses wherein when decoding of the information signal fails in the information receiver, the second wireless communication device transmits control information that increases the ratio of the transmission power of the information signal with respect to the transmission power of the energy signal to the first wireless communication device ([0094], [0096], [0119], [0124], [0128], [0145]). For claim 6. The wireless communication system according to claim 1, Choi discloses wherein when decoding of the information signal fails in the information receiver, the second wireless communication device transmits control information that increases the transmission power of the information signal and the energy signal to the first wireless communication device ([0094], [0096], [0119], [0124], [0128], [0145]). For claim 7. The wireless communication system according to claim 1, Choi discloses wherein when detecting that the second wireless communication device is in a non-communication state, the first wireless communication device stops the transmission of the information signal and transmits only the energy signal to the second wireless communication device ([0107]). For claim 9. The wireless communication system according to claim 1, Choi discloses wherein the transmission circuit simultaneously transmits the information signal and the energy signal to the second wireless communication device by time division multiplexing (figure 1, [0008], [0011], [0047]). For claim 10. Choi discloses A wireless communication method for transmitting power from a first wireless communication device (figure 4, BS 410) to a second wireless communication device (figure 4, UE 420) using a wireless signal, wherein the first wireless communication device includes a transmission circuit that transmits an information signal and an energy signal ([0064], [0122]-[0124]), and the second wireless communication device includes a splitter that branches a received signal from the first wireless communication device and generates a first received signal and a second received signal (figures 5 and 12-14), an energy receiver that rectifies the energy signal included in the first received signal and generates a direct current ([0137]), an information receiver that decodes the information signal included in the second received signal (figures 5 and 12-13), and the second wireless communication device transmits control information that includes a request related to transmission power of the information signal and transmission power of the energy signal to the first wireless communication device ([0070]-[0075], [0099], figure 7), and the first wireless communication device controls the transmission power of the information signal and the transmission power of the energy signal based on the control information ([0070]-[0075], [0110]-[0113], [0131], [0133]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 7. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. 8. Claim(s) 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Choi (US 20170288473 A1) in view of Elkotby (US 20230057994 A1). For claim 8. The wireless communication system according to claim 1, Choi fails to disclose wherein the transmission circuit simultaneously transmits the information signal and the energy signal to the second wireless communication device by frequency division multiplexing. This teaching is disclosed by Elkotby ([0300], Frequency domain filtering between information and energy transfer). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the selection techniques taught by Elkotby into the art of Choi as to use frequency division as an alternative embodiment. Allowable Subject Matter 9. Claim 4 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The claim is allowable over the prior art of record because none of the references, either alone or in combination, discloses or renders obvious the limitation of claim 4. Conclusion Any response to this Office Action should be faxed to (571) 273-8300, submitted online via the USPTO's Electronic Filing System-Web (EFS-Web) (Registered eFilers only, Registered users of the USPTO's EFS-Web system may submit a response electronically through EFS-Web at https://efs.uspto.gov/TruePassSample/AuthenticateUserLocalEPF.html), or mailed to: Commissioner for Patents P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Rui Meng Hu whose telephone number is 571-270-1105, email is ruimeng.hu@uspto.gov. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday - Friday, 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, Applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jinsong Hu can be reached on (571)272-3965. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Rui Meng Hu/ R.H./rh September 12, 2026 /JINSONG HU/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2643
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 29, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12738983
RIS CAPABILITY REPORTING
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12724583
AUDIO PLAYING CONTROL METHOD AND AUDIO OUTPUT DEVICE
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12719510
INTEGRATED CONTROL INTERFACE ELIMINATING SERIAL DIE-TO-DIE DELAY TIME
4y 0m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12720441
SIGNAL MODULATION BASED ON DUTY-CYCLE CONTROL FOR RADIO FREQUENCY (RF) POWER AMPLIFIERS
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12707398
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR POWER CONTROL OF PUSCH REPETITION
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+24.9%)
3y 4m (~1y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 614 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month