Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/039,977

TELEVISION MONITOR WITH DUAL CONFIGURATION SUPPORT ASSEMBLY

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 29, 2025
Priority
Jan 19, 2021 — provisional 63/139,060 +1 more
Examiner
WERNER, DAVID N
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Vizio Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 8m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
498 granted / 731 resolved
+8.1% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
765
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.6%
-29.4% vs TC avg
§103
42.0%
+2.0% vs TC avg
§102
24.2%
-15.8% vs TC avg
§112
18.9%
-21.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 731 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION This is the First Action on the Merits for U.S. Patent Application No. 19/039,977, filed 29 January 2025, which is a continuation of U.S. Patent Application No. 17/578,870, now U.S. Patent No. 12,244,959, filed 19 January 2022, which claims domestic priority to Provisional Application No. 63/139,060, filed 19 January 2021. Claims 1–30 are pending. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 U.S.C. § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. § 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 1, 2, 7, 8, and 15–22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The terms “substantially parallel” and “substantially perpendicular” in the claims are relative terms which render the claims indefinite. The term “substantially” is not defined by the claims, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. For example, in closest prior art US 2021/0317945 A11 at Figure 9, would display assembly 2 be substantially perpendicular or not to support bar 210? Allowable Subject Matter Claims 11–142 are allowed. Claims 3–6, 9, 10, and 23–30 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: each of the independent claims recite that in the wall-mountable configuration, the two base members are spaced apart from the bottom surface of the television monitor along the monitor height axis. As discussed above in the Notice of Allowance for the ‘959 application, this distinguishes from the closest prior art including the ‘945 publication and US 2007/01452123 in which feet or supports analogous to the claimed base members are hidden in a wall-mountable configuration. The advantage of the present invention is enabling a soundbar to be mounted on the base members in the wall-mountable configuration. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The following prior art was found using an Artificial Intelligence assisted search using an internal AI tool that uses the classification of the application under the Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) system, as well as from the specification, including the claims and abstract, of the application as contextual information. The documents are ranked from most to least relevant. Where possible, English-language equivalents are given, and redundant results within the same patent families are eliminated. See “New Artificial Intelligence Functionality in PE2E Search”, 1504 OG 359 (15 November 2022), “Automated Search Pilot Program”, 90 F.R. 48,161 (8 October 2025). US 2015/0097102 A1 FR 2687436 A1 US 5139223 A GB 2100090 A US 2003/0189155 A1 US 5810314 A JP 2001099135 A US 4607897 A US 2012/0085713 A1 Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to David N Werner whose telephone number is (571)272-9662. The examiner can normally be reached M--F 7:30--4:00 Central. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dave Czekaj can be reached at 571.272.7327. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /David N Werner/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2487 1 This reference was listed in the 21 February 2025 Information Disclosure Statement. 2 Claim 17 is dependent on claim 14, with intervening claims 15 and 16 dependent on claim 11. See M.P.E.P. § 608.01(n)(IV) (best practice for claim sequence). Applicant is requested to confirm whether claim 17 is intended to be dependent on claim 14 or on claim 11. 3 This reference was listed in the 21 February 2025 Information Disclosure Statement.
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 29, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12744930
INTER PREDICTION MODE DEPENDENT SCALING FACTORS
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12739527
Driver Monitoring System and Associated Image-Capture Method
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12731418
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING SAME
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12707090
POINT CLOUD DATA TRANSMISSION DEVICE, POINT CLOUD DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD, POINT CLOUD DATA RECEPTION DEVICE, AND POINT CLOUD DATA RECEPTION METHOD
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12695913
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COMPRESSION OF FEATURE DATA USING JOINT CODING IN CODING OF MULTI-DIMENSIONAL DATA
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+16.5%)
3y 4m (~1y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 731 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month