Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/040,205

CONNECTING DEVICE OF LIQUID COOLING MODULE

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Jan 29, 2025
Priority
Aug 10, 2021 — provisional 63/227,442 +2 more
Examiner
LINFORD, JAMES ALBERT
Art Unit
3679
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Delta Electronics Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
492 granted / 768 resolved
+12.1% vs TC avg
Strong +34% interview lift
Without
With
+33.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
801
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
42.8%
+2.8% vs TC avg
§102
27.4%
-12.6% vs TC avg
§112
27.7%
-12.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 768 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Election/Restrictions Claims 1-11 are pending. Claims 4 and 9 are withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 5-8, 10, and 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Li et al. (US 2022/0136628), (hereinafter, Li). Note: the above listed reference has a filing date of 02/02/2021. PNG media_image1.png 698 795 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 652 709 media_image2.png Greyscale Re Clm 1: Li discloses a connecting device (see Figs. 1-20 and see the Fig. above) of a liquid cooling module, comprising: a floating connector (120, 143, 140, 110, and 160), having a channel for a fluid passing through (the central bore) and comprising an anti-rotation structure (the 4001s and the 4002s of 142); a case (130, 130a, and 130b), comprising a through hole (the central opening which also incorporates the opening formed by the four 136s); and an elastic sheet (three of the 150s and see [0033]), comprising: a first extending structure (1001) affixed to the case (see above); a second extending (1002) structure connected to the floating connector (see above); a curved structure (1003), wherein a head end (1013) of the curved structure is connected to the first extending structure (see above), and a tail end of the curved structure (1023) is connected to the second extending structure (see above), wherein the floating connector passes through the through hole (see Figs. 2-4), and the anti-rotation structure is accommodated in the through hole to restrict the rotation angle of the floating connector (see Figs. 2-4), wherein the anti-rotation structure comprises a lateral side (on the lateral side of 4002), the through hole comprises a wall facing the lateral side (see above), and the lateral side and the wall are concave and convex, respectively (see Figs. 2-4 and above), wherein the second extending structure (1002) includes a cantilever structure (1112’ and 1112) having a fixed end (fixed to 1012) and a free end (at the end of 1112’), the fixed end is connected (connected being defined as linked) to the curved structure (the fixed end is linked to 1003 via 1012), and the free end is opposite to the fixed end (see above). Re Clm 2: Li discloses wherein the second extending structure has a plate (1012) in contact with the floating connector in a detachable manner (see Figs. 1-20 and see the Fig. above). Re Clm 3: Li discloses wherein the first extending structure is substantially parallel to the second extending structure (see above, even though the first extending structure and the second extending structure are not parallel with each other they are substantially parallel with each other). Re Clm 5: Li discloses wherein the through hole comprises a wall (at 7001), and a gap is formed between the anti-rotation structure and the wall (the gap is formed between 7001 and 4002). Re Clm 6: Li discloses wherein the floating connector further comprises a guiding hole disposed adjacent to the channel (the hole that contains 160). Re Clm 7: Li discloses wherein the connecting device further comprises a spring connected to the case and the floating connector (the fourth of the 150s and see [0033]). Re Clm 8: Li discloses a connecting device (see Figs. 1-20 and see the Fig. above) of a liquid cooling module, comprising: a floating connector (120, 143, 140, 110, and 160), having a channel (the central bore) for a fluid passing through; and comprising an anti-rotation structure (the 4001s and the 4002s of 142); a case (130, 130a, and 130b), comprising a through hole (the central opening which also incorporates the opening formed by the four 136s); and a plurality of elastic sheets (two of the 150s and see [0033]), wherein each of the elastic sheets comprises: a first extending structure (1001), affixed to the case (see above); a second extending structure (1002), connected to the floating connector (see above); and a curved structure (1003), wherein a head end (1013) of the curved structure is connected to the first extending structure (see above), and a tail end (1023) of the curved structure is connected to the second extending structure (see above), wherein the connecting portions of the elastic sheets and the floating connector are symmetrically disposed relative to a central axis of the floating connector (see above), wherein the floating connector passes through the through hole (see Figs. 2-4), and the anti-rotation structure is accommodated in the through hole to restrict the rotation angle of the floating connector (see Figs. 2-4), wherein the anti-rotation structure comprises a lateral side (on the lateral side of 4002), the through hole comprises a wall facing the lateral side (see above), and the lateral side and the wall are concave and convex, respectively (see Figs. 2-4 and above), wherein the second extending structure (1002) includes a cantilever structure (1112’ and 1112) having a fixed end (fixed to 1012) and a free end (at the end of 1112’), the fixed end is connected (connected being defined as linked) to the curved structure (the fixed end is linked to 1003 via 1012), and the free end is opposite to the fixed end (see above). Re Clm 10: Li discloses wherein the floating connector further comprises a guiding hole disposed adjacent to the channel (the hole that contains 160). Re Clm 11: Li discloses wherein the connecting device further comprises a spring connected to the case and the floating connector (the fourth of the 150s and see [0033]). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 06/11/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues, on page 5, line 13 through page 8 the entire page, that Li fails to disclose “wherein the second extending structure includes a cantilever structure having a fixed end and a free end, the fixed end is connected to the curved structure, and the free end is opposite to the fixed end”. This is not persuasive. Li discloses that the second extending structure, 1002, includes a cantilever structure, that includes 1112’ and 1112, having a fixed end at 1012 and a free end at the free end of 1112’, the fixed end is connected, in this instant linked, to the curved structure, where 1003 1012 adjoin, and the free end is opposite to the fixed end, as illustrated above. All claims not specifically argued will stand or fall with the claim from which it/they depend. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES A LINFORD whose telephone number is (571)270-3066. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Friday: 8:00 am to 5:00 pm Eastern Time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Troutman can be reached at (571) 270-3654. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JAMES ALBERT LINFORD Examiner Art Unit 3679 08/25/2026 /Matthew Troutman/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3679
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 29, 2025
Application Filed
Mar 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jun 11, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 01, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12729787
TUBULAR CONNECTOR
4y 0m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12716455
COUPLING BUSHING WITH SMOOTH-RUNNING SEAL
2y 1m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12710119
Profiled clamp
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12698851
System Having a Device for Producing a Pipeline Unit and Method for Producing a Pipeline Unit
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12692965
BRANCH TEE FOR SPRINKLER PIPES CONTROLLING WATER STREAM AUTOMATICALLY AND SPRINKLER PIPING SYSTEM HAVING THE SAME
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+33.8%)
3y 2m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 768 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month