Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/043,368

CONFIGURING AD HOC CONTENT SERVERS BASED ON SERVER LOAD LIMITS

Final Rejection §DP
Filed
Jan 31, 2025
Priority
Oct 31, 2023 — continuation of 12/250,265
Examiner
CHOU, ALAN S
Art Unit
2451
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
T-Mobile USA Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
492 granted / 652 resolved
+17.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
671
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.4%
-27.6% vs TC avg
§103
48.2%
+8.2% vs TC avg
§102
26.1%
-13.9% vs TC avg
§112
3.5%
-36.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 652 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This action is in response to amendment filed on July 30, 2026. Claims 1-20 are presented for examination. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP §§ 706.02(l)(1) - 706.02(l)(3) for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 1 of the parent U.S. Patent No. 12,250,265 B2. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the instant independent claims 1, 8, and 15 recite similar steps such as: receiving a current server load notification; determining current load exceeds threshold; send a new server setup notification; receive a new server notification; and divert future client requests. The instant independent claims recites a broader limitation of removing steps of content server continues to server the content data set to previous client request from the geographical region that were received prior to the period. Instant Application Parent 12,250,265 B2 1. A system comprising: a processor; and a memory storing computer-executable instructions that, upon execution by the processor, cause the processor to: receive, by a domain name server (DNS), a current server load notification indicating a current load of a content server, the content server assigned to serve a content dataset in a geographical region; determine, by the DNS, that the current load of the content server exceeds a server load threshold based on the current server load notification; send, by the DNS, a new server setup notification to the content server in response to determining that the current load of the content server exceeds the server load threshold, the new server setup notification prompting the content server to perform a content service handover of the content dataset to an ad hoc server; receive, by the DNS, a new server notification from the content server, the new server notification indicating that the ad hoc server is ready to serve the content dataset; and divert, by the DNS, future client requests for the content dataset originating from the geographical region to the ad hoc server. 1. A system comprising: a processor; and a memory comprising computer program code, the memory and the computer program code configured to cause the processor to: provide, by a content server configured to serve a content dataset in a geographical region, a current server load notification to a domain name server (DNS) indicating that a current load of the content server exceeds a server load threshold; receive, by the content server, a new server setup notification based at least in part on the current server load notification; identify, by the content server in response to receiving the new server setup notification, an ad hoc server located in proximity to the geographic region to provide overflow capacity for the content server; perform, by the content server, a content service handover of the content dataset to the ad hoc server; and provide, by the content server, a new server notification to the DNS indicating that the ad hoc server is ready to serve the content dataset, wherein the new server notification prompts the DNS to divert future client requests for the content dataset originating from the geographical region to the ad hoc server during a period that the current load of the content server exceeds the server load threshold, and wherein the content server continues to serve the content dataset to previous client request from the geographical region that were received prior to the period. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see Remarks on page 7, filed July 30, 2026, with respect to 35 U.S.C. 103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The 103 rejections of claims 1, 3-8, 10-15, 17-20 has been withdrawn. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALAN S CHOU whose telephone number is (571)272-5779. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:00-5:00 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chris L Parry can be reached at (571)272-8328. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALAN S CHOU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2451
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 31, 2025
Application Filed
May 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP
Jul 13, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jul 13, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jul 30, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 30, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12764170
MULTIPLATFORM CONTENT REGISTRATION AND MONITORING
2y 7m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12755266
System for commercial services or facilities
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12743361
AUTOMATIC GENERATION OF PROCESS INSTRUCTIONS FROM LOG FILES
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12730857
Optimized Unbiased Statistical Analysis Of Partially Sampled Traces Without Completeness Information
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12732799
ACCESS NETWORK DEVICE SELECTION METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+14.1%)
3y 2m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 652 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month