Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 19/043,511

Improved multi-port elementary antenna and associated active electronically scanned array antenna

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 02, 2025
Priority
Feb 06, 2024 — FR 2401135
Examiner
CORRIELUS, JEAN B
Art Unit
2845
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Institut Polytechnique De Bordeaux
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
889 granted / 992 resolved
+21.6% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
999
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.4%
-29.6% vs TC avg
§103
34.2%
-5.8% vs TC avg
§102
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
§112
30.2%
-9.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 992 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement filed 02/02/2025 fails to comply with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.98(a)(4) because it lacks the appropriate size fee assertion. It has been placed in the application file, but the information referred to therein has not been considered as to the merits. The information disclosure statement filed 02/02/2025 fails to comply with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97(a) because it lacks the appropriate size fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(v). It has been placed in the application file, but the information referred to therein has not been considered as to the merits. Specification The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Drawings The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(5) because they do not include the following reference sign(s) mentioned in the description1: 2021, 2212 and 2213. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Objections Claim 10 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 10, line 3, what does it mean by “consistent” as recited in the claim? For examination purpose, the examiner understood the term to mean “similar”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The limitation “the preceding elementary antenna” and “the array”, recited in claim 10, line 3, each lacks of proper antecedent basis, as claim 1 does not include any limitations to an “array” including a “preceding elementary antenna”. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 10 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Claims 1-9 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: an elementary antenna is disclosed. The closest prior art, JP2020505892 discloses a similar antenna system (fig. 1 ) as including a radiating element (10) including a plurality of zone and a plurality of input ports; a transmit/receive module (1) comprising amplifier (118) and a phase shifter (29). However, it fails to teach, in combination with the other claimed limitations, “an i-th compensation phase shifter, located on a second side of said i-th amplifier opposite the first side, and wherein the sum of the phases brought in by said i-th robustness phase shifter and the i-th compensation phase shifter is constant whichever chain is considered, and the phase brought in said i-th robustness phase shifter is strictly different from the phase brought in by the other robustness phase shifters of the other chains of the elementary antenna”. Such limitations, as recited in the claim are neither anticipated nor rendered obvious by JP reference. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JEAN B CORRIELUS whose telephone number is (571)272-3020. The examiner can normally be reached 10:00AM-3:00PM Monday-Thursday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sam K Ahn can be reached at 571-272-3044. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JEAN B CORRIELUS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2633 1 See, for example, paras. [0124]-[0126].
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 02, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12689430
BEAM FAILURE RECOVERY FOR SINGLE DCI-BASED M-TRP URLLC TRANSMISSIONS
1y 11m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12671608
LOS-MIMO MICROWAVE RADIO LINK CHANNEL ESTIMATION FOR RANK DEFICIENT CHANNELS
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12658993
Multi-Tier Digital Beamforming
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12659191
CHANNEL CALIBRATION IN HIGH DENSITY ANTENNA SYSTEMS
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12646862
ANTENNA-PLEXER FOR INTERFERENCE CANCELLATION
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+15.4%)
2y 4m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 992 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month