Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 19/043,825

TIMEPIECE COMPRISING A CHRONOGRAPH MECHANISM PROVIDED WITH A DEVICE INDICATING THE OPERATING STATUS OF THE CHRONOGRAPH MECHANISM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 03, 2025
Priority
Jun 05, 2024 — EU 24180269.3
Examiner
COLLINS, JASON M
Art Unit
2844
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Omega SA
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
396 granted / 528 resolved
+7.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
548
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
49.4%
+9.4% vs TC avg
§102
27.1%
-12.9% vs TC avg
§112
18.9%
-21.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 528 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification Applicant is reminded of the proper language and format for an abstract of the disclosure. The form and legal phraseology often used in patent claims, such as “means” and “said,” should be avoided. The objected to language is “said”. Claim Objections Claims 6-8 and 10 are objected to because of the following informalities: In claim 6, “said at least one shuttle” lacks antecedent basis because it does not depend from claim 3. In claims 7 and 8, “the dial side” lacks antecedent basis because claim 8, which recites “a dial” and would provide antecedent basis is dependent on claim 7. If the antecedent basis with claim 7 was fixed the dial recited in claim 8 would cause confusion unless changed to “the dial”. In claim 10, “the inside face” lacks antecedent basis. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation “to provide the various operating statuses of the chronograph mechanism”. This limitation is indefinite because it not known what is meant by “the various operating statuses” which have not been defined and additionally lack antecedent basis. The scope of “various operating statuses” cannot be determined and is therefore rejected. Claims 2-11 are rejected for their dependency. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-11 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art fails to disclose or reasonably suggest the claimed timepiece with the chronograph mechanism including a coordination member rotated about a pivot axis each time the chronograph start/stop control device is operated and directly activating a set of control levers, wherein the chronograph mechanism comprises a status indicator device fixed to the coordination member for rotation therewith, the status indicator device comprising a first portion presenting a first item of information and a second portion presenting a second item of information, which is different from the first item of information, each portion of the status indicator being positioned alternately facing an aperture in a mask comprised in the timepiece, each time said chronograph start/stop control device is operated. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JASON COLLINS whose telephone number is (571)270-3994. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30 AM - 6:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Renee Luebke can be reached at 571-272-2009. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JASON M COLLINS/ Examiner, Art Unit 2831 /EDWIN A. LEON/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2831
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 03, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12769255
CERMET AND/OR CERAMIC MULTI-COLOURED ARTICLE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME
4y 7m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12769252
HOROLOGICAL LINKAGE MECHANISM WITH FLEXIBLE GUIDANCE
3y 11m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12769256
DIAL FOR A WATCH
3y 0m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12769261
Detection Device and Rotation Detecting Method for the Crown of Smart Watch
2y 8m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12761606
TRI-AXIS FORCE SENSOR
2y 2m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+12.9%)
2y 9m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 528 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month