Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 19/044,068

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR UPLINK SCHEDULING CONSIDERING PATHLOSS IN NETWORK COOPERATIVE COMMUNICATION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 03, 2025
Priority
Feb 01, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0016192 +1 more
Examiner
RICHMOND, GARTH DANIEL
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
21 granted / 28 resolved
+15.0% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+24.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
63
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
§103
67.0%
+27.0% vs TC avg
§102
16.2%
-23.8% vs TC avg
§112
12.6%
-27.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 28 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Designations of the Particular Relevance of the Art The Examiner has pointed out particular references contained in the prior art of record within the body of the Action for Applicant’s convenience. Although the specified citations are representative of the teachings in the art and are applied to the specific limitations within the individual claim, other passages, paragraph and figures may apply. Applicant, in preparing the response, should consider fully the reference in totality as potentially teaching all or part of the claimed invention, as well as the context of the passage as taught by the prior art or explained by the Examiner. MPEP § 707.05. Manner of Making Amendments under 37 C.F.R. § 1.121 Any amendatory submission by Applicant must comply with the requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 1.121(c) and MPEP § 714(II)(C) regarding the manner of presenting amended claims. That is, amended text must be properly indicated. Failure to provide a compliant amendment may result in the amendment being treated as non-compliant and not entered. Pursuant to MPEP § 714(II)(C), all changes to currently amended claims must be shown relative to the immediate prior version of the claims. Deleted matter ordinarily must be shown by strike-through; however, when deleting five (5) or fewer consecutive characters, deletion by double brackets may be used and, in certain circumstances, is required. In particular, where strike-through cannot be readily perceived—such as when deleting a single numeral, punctuation mark, or other short character string—double brackets must be used to clearly identify the deleted matter. For example, deletion of punctuation marks standing alone (e.g., commas, periods, semicolons, parentheses, or quotation marks) should be indicated by double brackets rather than strike-through. Similarly, the text of any added subject matter must be presented in a manner such that the underlining is readily perceptible. Where underlining of added matter cannot be easily perceived, including, for example, the addition, deletion, or substitution of one or more characters, punctuation marks, numerals, or word fragments, the amendment shall instead be presented by deleting the entire affected text and adding the complete replacement text with underlining. Examples include, without limitation, amendments correcting misspellings, changing a singular term to a plural term or vice versa, adding or deleting prefixes or suffixes, or modifying punctuation or numerals. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. § 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over US 2024/0039582 (hereinafter, “SHAH”) in view of US 2025/0310893 (hereinafter, “CIRIK”). Regarding claim 1, SHAH discloses: A method performed by a user equipment (UE) (UE 160) in a communication system (wireless communications architecture 100), the method comprising: receiving, via higher layer signaling, a first configuration of a list of transmission configuration indication (TCI) states; (¶ 0138: At 1701, the UE receives transmission configuration indicator (TCI) state information specifying an indicated TCI state set including one or more activated TCI states; ¶ 0028: Unified TCI state pools may be configured via higher-layer signaling; ¶ 0037: After the UE receives a higher-layer configuration of unified TCI states, such via RRC configuration, and before application of an indicated TCI state from the configured TCI states) receiving a first medium access control (MAC) control element (CE) mapping TCI states among the TCI states in the list to codepoints of a TCI field in downlink control information (DCI); (¶ 0031: The signaling medium that is used to update unified TCI state may be a UE-specific DCI with or without PDSCH assignment. The unified TCI state may be indicated by a codepoint value in a TCI field of DCI format 1_1 or 1_2, wherein the codepoint value maps to one or more activated unified TCI states (e.g., up to 8 activated states) activated by MAC CE command. Each of codepoint values may be mapped to a joint DL/UL TCI state, a pair of DL and UL TCI states, a DL-only TCI state for separate DL/UL TCI states, or a UL-only TCI state for separate DL/UL TCI states) receiving the DCI including the TCI field with a codepoint; (¶ 0031: The signaling medium that is used to update unified TCI state may be a UE-specific DCI with or without PDSCH assignment. The unified TCI state may be indicated by a codepoint value in a TCI field of DCI format 1_1 or 1_2, wherein the codepoint value maps to one or more activated unified TCI states (e.g., up to 8 activated states) activated by MAC CE command. Each of codepoint values may be mapped to a joint DL/UL TCI state, a pair of DL and UL TCI states, a DL-only TCI state for separate DL/UL TCI states, or a UL-only TCI state for separate DL/UL TCI states) identifying an indicated TCI state based on the codepoint; (¶ 0056: [T]he UE may use a predetermined rule to identify unified TCI states/TRP association such that the order of TCI state ID or order of TCI states in codepoint mapping in MAC CE (e.g., the smallest/largest/specific ID or TCI state) is based on the order of target resource ID) identifying first transmission power for a first uplink transmission . . . ; and (¶ 0051: [T]he UL power control parameter setting including pathloss RS should be derived based on the setting associated with indicated unified TCI for the SRS resource with the lowest ID in that SRS resource set. The pathloss RS and power control parameters (e.g., P0, alpha, closed loop index) for target UL channels and RSs may be associated with UL or joint TCI states per BWP via RRC configuration) transmitting the first uplink transmission based on the first transmission power. (¶ 0139: At 1804, the UE applies a configuration of the default TCI state to carry out at least one of uplink (UL) transmissions) It appears that SHAH does not explicitly disclose: based on a pathloss offset value included in the indicated TCI state In the same field of endeavor, however, CIRIK teaches: based on a pathloss offset value included in the indicated TCI state (¶ 0350: [T]he first TCI state may comprise/have/indicate/provide the first pathloss offset value) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify SHAH’s transmission configuration indicator (TCI) framework to provide pathloss offset value as taught by CIRIK to the wireless device may determine a pathloss offset for determination of the transmission power for the uplink-only communication, so as to reduce the interference and/or increase the data rate. See CIRIK, at ¶ 0202. Regarding claim 2, the combination of SHAH and CIRIK, as applied above, renders obvious the method of claim 1. SHAH does not appear to explicitly disclose: wherein at least some of the TCI states in the list respectively include pathloss offset values. In the same field of endeavor, however, CIRIK teaches: wherein at least some of the TCI states in the list respectively include pathloss offset values. (¶ 0350: [T]he first TCI state may comprise/have/indicate/provide the first pathloss offset value; ¶ 0004: [A] wireless device may receive one or more configuration parameters (e.g., a state list and/or pathloss offset values associated with the state list)) Regarding claim 3, the combination of SHAH and CIRIK, as applied above, renders obvious the method of claim 1. SHAH further discloses: further comprising receiving, via the higher layer signaling, a second configuration of unified TCI state type, wherein, in case that the second configuration indicates joint, the TCI states in the list are joint TCI states for uplink and downlink operation, and wherein, in case that the second configuration indicates separate, the TCI states in the list are uplink TCI states. (¶ 0028: Unified TCI state pools may be configured via higher-layer signaling for each bandwidth part (BWP)/component carrier (CC). In general, TCI states for DL and UL transmission may be configured from separate pools, although in case of joint DL/UL TCI states, the same DL TCI state pool may be shared for UL transmissions, as well. That is, the unified TCI state may be either a joint DL/UL TCI state (i.e. JointULDL type), which means the serving cell is configured with a single pool for both DL and UL operations (DLorJoint-TCIState-r17), or a pair of separate DL and UL TCI states (i.e. separateULDL type), which means the serving cell may be configured with two pools, one pool for DL operation (DLorJoint-TCIState-r17) and one pool for UL operation (UL-TCIState-r17)) Regarding claim 4, the combination of SHAH and CIRIK, as applied above, renders obvious the method of claim 1. SHAH does not appear to explicitly disclose: further comprising: receiving a second MAC CE to update the pathloss offset value; identifying an updated pathloss offset value based on the second MAC CE; identifying second transmission power for second uplink transmission based on the updated pathloss offset value; and transmitting the second uplink transmission based on the second transmission power. In the same field of endeavor, however, CIRIK teaches: receiving a second MAC CE to update the pathloss offset value; identifying an updated pathloss offset value based on the second MAC CE; identifying second transmission power for second uplink transmission based on the updated pathloss offset value; and (¶ 0460: FIG. 24 shows an example method for pathloss offset update control command in wireless communication. . . . At step 2406, the wireless device may receive (e.g., from a base station) a message (e.g., a medium-access control (MAC) control element (CE)), wherein the MAC-CE may comprise a serving cell identifier indicating the cell, a bandwidth part (BWP) indicator field indicating a BWP of the cell, a TCI state identifier indicating the first TCI state from the list of TCI states, and a pathloss offset field mapped to a second pathloss offset value in a preconfigured table. The preconfigured table may comprise pathloss offset values with increments of a step size) transmitting the second uplink transmission based on the second transmission power. (¶ 0460: At step 2408, the wireless device may send, via the cell, (e.g., to the base station) second uplink transmissions using a second transmission power, wherein the second transmission power may be determined based on the pathloss reference signal associated with the first TCI state, and the second pathloss offset value indicated by the MAC CE) Regarding claim 5, the combination of SHAH and CIRIK, as applied above, renders obvious the method of claim 4. CIRIK further discloses: wherein the second MAC CE includes at least one of: a serving cell identifier (ID) field; an uplink bandwidth part (BWP) ID field; a pathloss reference signal ID field; a pathloss reference signal group field; an activated pathloss reference signal ID field; a pathloss offset value field; or a TCI state field. (¶ 0460: [T]he MAC-CE may comprise a serving cell identifier indicating the cell, a bandwidth part (BWP) indicator field indicating a BWP of the cell, a TCI state identifier indicating the first TCI state from the list of TCI states, and a pathloss offset field mapped to a second pathloss offset value in a preconfigured table) Regarding claim 6, SHAH discloses: A user equipment (UE) (UE 160, 2005 / electronic device 1901) in a communication system (network environment 1900), the UE comprising: a transceiver; and (radio 2015) a processor (processing circuit 2020) coupled with the transceiver and configured to: receive, via higher layer signaling, a first configuration of a list of transmission configuration indication (TCI) states, (¶ 0138: At 1701, the UE receives transmission configuration indicator (TCI) state information specifying an indicated TCI state set including one or more activated TCI states; ¶ 0028: Unified TCI state pools may be configured via higher-layer signaling; ¶ 0037: After the UE receives a higher-layer configuration of unified TCI states, such via RRC configuration, and before application of an indicated TCI state from the configured TCI states) receive a first medium access control (MAC) control element (CE) mapping TCI states among the TCI states in the list to codepoints of a TCI field in downlink control information (DCI), (¶ 0031: The signaling medium that is used to update unified TCI state may be a UE-specific DCI with or without PDSCH assignment. The unified TCI state may be indicated by a codepoint value in a TCI field of DCI format 1_1 or 1_2, wherein the codepoint value maps to one or more activated unified TCI states (e.g., up to 8 activated states) activated by MAC CE command. Each of codepoint values may be mapped to a joint DL/UL TCI state, a pair of DL and UL TCI states, a DL-only TCI state for separate DL/UL TCI states, or a UL-only TCI state for separate DL/UL TCI states) receive the DCI including the TCI field with a codepoint, (¶ 0031: The signaling medium that is used to update unified TCI state may be a UE-specific DCI with or without PDSCH assignment. The unified TCI state may be indicated by a codepoint value in a TCI field of DCI format 1_1 or 1_2, wherein the codepoint value maps to one or more activated unified TCI states (e.g., up to 8 activated states) activated by MAC CE command. Each of codepoint values may be mapped to a joint DL/UL TCI state, a pair of DL and UL TCI states, a DL-only TCI state for separate DL/UL TCI states, or a UL-only TCI state for separate DL/UL TCI states) identify an indicated TCI state based on the codepoint, (¶ 0056: [T]he UE may use a predetermined rule to identify unified TCI states/TRP association such that the order of TCI state ID or order of TCI states in codepoint mapping in MAC CE (e.g., the smallest/largest/specific ID or TCI state) is based on the order of target resource ID) identify first transmission power for a first uplink transmission . . . , and (¶ 0051: [T]he UL power control parameter setting including pathloss RS should be derived based on the setting associated with indicated unified TCI for the SRS resource with the lowest ID in that SRS resource set. The pathloss RS and power control parameters (e.g., P0, alpha, closed loop index) for target UL channels and RSs may be associated with UL or joint TCI states per BWP via RRC configuration) transmit the first uplink transmission based on the first transmission power. (¶ 0139: At 1804, the UE applies a configuration of the default TCI state to carry out at least one of uplink (UL) transmissions) It appears that SHAH does not explicitly disclose: based on a pathloss offset value included in the indicated TCI state In the same field of endeavor, however, CIRIK teaches: based on a pathloss offset value included in the indicated TCI state (¶ 0350: [T]he first TCI state may comprise/have/indicate/provide the first pathloss offset value) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify SHAH’s transmission configuration indicator (TCI) framework to provide pathloss offset value as taught by CIRIK to the wireless device may determine a pathloss offset for determination of the transmission power for the uplink-only communication, so as to reduce the interference and/or increase the data rate. See CIRIK, at ¶ 0202. Regarding claim 7, the combination of SHAH and CIRIK, as applied above, renders obvious the UE of claim 6. SHAH does not appear to explicitly disclose: wherein at least some of the TCI states in the list respectively include pathloss offset values. In the same field of endeavor, however, CIRIK teaches: wherein at least some of the TCI states in the list respectively include pathloss offset values. (¶ 0350: [T]he first TCI state may comprise/have/indicate/provide the first pathloss offset value; ¶ 0004: [A] wireless device may receive one or more configuration parameters (e.g., a state list and/or pathloss offset values associated with the state list)) Regarding claim 8, the combination of SHAH and CIRIK, as applied above, renders obvious the UE of claim 6. SHAH further discloses: wherein the processor is further configured to receive, via the higher layer signaling, a second configuration of a unified TCI state type, wherein, in case that the second configuration indicates joint, the TCI states in the list are joint TCI states for uplink and downlink operation, and wherein, in case that the second configuration indicates separate, the TCI states in the list are uplink TCI states. (¶ 0028: Unified TCI state pools may be configured via higher-layer signaling for each bandwidth part (BWP)/component carrier (CC). In general, TCI states for DL and UL transmission may be configured from separate pools, although in case of joint DL/UL TCI states, the same DL TCI state pool may be shared for UL transmissions, as well. That is, the unified TCI state may be either a joint DL/UL TCI state (i.e. JointULDL type), which means the serving cell is configured with a single pool for both DL and UL operations (DLorJoint-TCIState-r17), or a pair of separate DL and UL TCI states (i.e. separateULDL type), which means the serving cell may be configured with two pools, one pool for DL operation (DLorJoint-TCIState-r17) and one pool for UL operation (UL-TCIState-r17)) Regarding claim 9, the combination of SHAH and CIRIK, as applied above, renders obvious the UE of claim 6. SHAH does not appear to explicitly disclose: wherein the processor is further configured to: receive a second MAC CE to update the pathloss offset value, identify an updated pathloss offset value based on the second MAC CE, identify second transmission power for second uplink transmission based on the updated pathloss offset value, and transmit the second uplink transmission based on the second transmission power. In the same field of endeavor, however, CIRIK teaches: receive a second MAC CE to update the pathloss offset value, identify an updated pathloss offset value based on the second MAC CE, identify second transmission power for second uplink transmission based on the updated pathloss offset value, and (¶ 0460: FIG. 24 shows an example method for pathloss offset update control command in wireless communication. . . . At step 2406, the wireless device may receive (e.g., from a base station) a message (e.g., a medium-access control (MAC) control element (CE)), wherein the MAC-CE may comprise a serving cell identifier indicating the cell, a bandwidth part (BWP) indicator field indicating a BWP of the cell, a TCI state identifier indicating the first TCI state from the list of TCI states, and a pathloss offset field mapped to a second pathloss offset value in a preconfigured table. The preconfigured table may comprise pathloss offset values with increments of a step size) transmit the second uplink transmission based on the second transmission power. (¶ 0460: At step 2408, the wireless device may send, via the cell, (e.g., to the base station) second uplink transmissions using a second transmission power, wherein the second transmission power may be determined based on the pathloss reference signal associated with the first TCI state, and the second pathloss offset value indicated by the MAC CE) Regarding claim 10, the combination of SHAH and CIRIK, as applied above, renders obvious the UE of claim 9. CIRIK further discloses: wherein the second MAC CE includes at least one of: a serving cell identifier (ID) field; an uplink bandwidth part (BWP) ID field; a pathloss reference signal ID field; a pathloss reference signal group field; an activated pathloss reference signal ID field; a pathloss offset value field; or a TCI state field. (¶ 0460: [T]he MAC-CE may comprise a serving cell identifier indicating the cell, a bandwidth part (BWP) indicator field indicating a BWP of the cell, a TCI state identifier indicating the first TCI state from the list of TCI states, and a pathloss offset field mapped to a second pathloss offset value in a preconfigured table) Regarding claim 11, SHAH discloses: A method performed by a base station (gNB 110) in a communication system (wireless communications architecture 100), the method comprising: transmitting, via higher layer signaling, a first configuration of a list of transmission configuration indication (TCI) states; (¶ 0138: At 1701, the UE receives transmission configuration indicator (TCI) state information specifying an indicated TCI state set including one or more activated TCI states; ¶ 0004: [T]he unified TCI framework simplifies signaling is by allowing the base station to indicate the transmission parameters for different reference signals using a single TCI field in the downlink control information (DCI); ¶ 0028: Unified TCI state pools may be configured via higher-layer signaling; ¶ 0037: After the UE receives a higher-layer configuration of unified TCI states, such via RRC configuration, and before application of an indicated TCI state from the configured TCI states) transmitting a first medium access control (MAC) control element (CE) mapping TCI states among the TCI states in the list to codepoints of a TCI field in downlink control information (DCI); (¶ 0031: The signaling medium that is used to update unified TCI state may be a UE-specific DCI with or without PDSCH assignment. The unified TCI state may be indicated by a codepoint value in a TCI field of DCI format 1_1 or 1_2, wherein the codepoint value maps to one or more activated unified TCI states (e.g., up to 8 activated states) activated by MAC CE command. Each of codepoint values may be mapped to a joint DL/UL TCI state, a pair of DL and UL TCI states, a DL-only TCI state for separate DL/UL TCI states, or a UL-only TCI state for separate DL/UL TCI states; ¶ 0004: [T]he unified TCI framework simplifies signaling is by allowing the base station to indicate the transmission parameters for different reference signals using a single TCI field in the downlink control information (DCI)) transmitting the DCI including the TCI field with a codepoint; and (¶ 0031: The signaling medium that is used to update unified TCI state may be a UE-specific DCI with or without PDSCH assignment. The unified TCI state may be indicated by a codepoint value in a TCI field of DCI format 1_1 or 1_2, wherein the codepoint value maps to one or more activated unified TCI states (e.g., up to 8 activated states) activated by MAC CE command. Each of codepoint values may be mapped to a joint DL/UL TCI state, a pair of DL and UL TCI states, a DL-only TCI state for separate DL/UL TCI states, or a UL-only TCI state for separate DL/UL TCI states; ¶ 0004: [T]he unified TCI framework simplifies signaling is by allowing the base station to indicate the transmission parameters for different reference signals using a single TCI field in the downlink control information (DCI)) receiving a first uplink transmission associated with first transmission power, (¶ 0139: At 1804, the UE applies a configuration of the default TCI state to carry out at least one of uplink (UL) transmissions; ¶ 0004: [T]he unified TCI framework simplifies signaling is by allowing the base station to indicate the transmission parameters for different reference signals using a single TCI field in the downlink control information (DCI)) . . . SHAH does not appear to explicitly disclose: wherein the first transmission power is based on a pathloss offset value included in a TCI state indicated by the codepoint. In the same field of endeavor, however, CIRIK teaches: wherein the first transmission power is based on a pathloss offset value included in a TCI state indicated by the codepoint. (¶ 0350: [T]he first TCI state may comprise/have/indicate/provide the first pathloss offset value) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify SHAH’s transmission configuration indicator (TCI) framework to provide pathloss offset value as taught by CIRIK to the wireless device may determine a pathloss offset for determination of the transmission power for the uplink-only communication, so as to reduce the interference and/or increase the data rate. See CIRIK, at ¶ 0202. Regarding claim 12, the combination of SHAH and CIRIK, as applied above, renders obvious the method of claim 11. SHAH does not appear to explicitly disclose: wherein at least some of the TCI states in the list respectively include pathloss offset values. In the same field of endeavor, however, CIRIK teaches: wherein at least some of the TCI states in the list respectively include pathloss offset values. (¶ 0350: [T]he first TCI state may comprise/have/indicate/provide the first pathloss offset value; ¶ 0004: [A] wireless device may receive one or more configuration parameters (e.g., a state list and/or pathloss offset values associated with the state list)) Regarding claim 13, the combination of SHAH and CIRIK, as applied above, renders obvious the method of claim 11. SHAH further discloses: further comprising transmitting, via the higher layer signaling, a second configuration of a unified TCI state type, wherein, in case that the second configuration indicates joint, the TCI states in the list are joint TCI states for uplink and downlink operation, and wherein, in case that the second configuration indicates separate, the TCI states in the list are uplink TCI states. (¶ 0028: Unified TCI state pools may be configured via higher-layer signaling for each bandwidth part (BWP)/component carrier (CC). In general, TCI states for DL and UL transmission may be configured from separate pools, although in case of joint DL/UL TCI states, the same DL TCI state pool may be shared for UL transmissions, as well. That is, the unified TCI state may be either a joint DL/UL TCI state (i.e. JointULDL type), which means the serving cell is configured with a single pool for both DL and UL operations (DLorJoint-TCIState-r17), or a pair of separate DL and UL TCI states (i.e. separateULDL type), which means the serving cell may be configured with two pools, one pool for DL operation (DLorJoint-TCIState-r17) and one pool for UL operation (UL-TCIState-r17)) Regarding claim 14, the combination of SHAH and CIRIK, as applied above, renders obvious the method of claim 11. SHAH does not appear to explicitly disclose: further comprising: transmitting a second MAC CE to update the pathloss offset value; and receiving second uplink transmission associated with second transmission power, wherein the second transmission power is based on an updated pathloss offset value associated with the second MAC CE. In the same field of endeavor, however, CIRIK teaches: transmitting a second MAC CE to update the pathloss offset value; and receiving second uplink transmission associated with second transmission power, wherein the second transmission power is based on an updated pathloss offset value associated with the second MAC CE. (¶ 0460: FIG. 24 shows an example method for pathloss offset update control command in wireless communication. . . . At step 2406, the wireless device may receive (e.g., from a base station) a message (e.g., a medium-access control (MAC) control element (CE)), wherein the MAC-CE may comprise a serving cell identifier indicating the cell, a bandwidth part (BWP) indicator field indicating a BWP of the cell, a TCI state identifier indicating the first TCI state from the list of TCI states, and a pathloss offset field mapped to a second pathloss offset value in a preconfigured table. The preconfigured table may comprise pathloss offset values with increments of a step size. At step 2408, the wireless device may send, via the cell, (e.g., to the base station) second uplink transmissions using a second transmission power, wherein the second transmission power may be determined based on the pathloss reference signal associated with the first TCI state, and the second pathloss offset value indicated by the MAC CE) Regarding claim 15, the combination of SHAH and CIRIK, as applied above, renders obvious the method of claim 14. CIRIK further discloses: wherein the second MAC CE includes at least one of: a serving cell identifier (ID) field; an uplink bandwidth part (BWP) ID field; a pathloss reference signal ID field; a pathloss reference signal group field; an activated pathloss reference signal ID field; a pathloss offset value field; or a TCI state field. (¶ 0460: [T]he MAC-CE may comprise a serving cell identifier indicating the cell, a bandwidth part (BWP) indicator field indicating a BWP of the cell, a TCI state identifier indicating the first TCI state from the list of TCI states, and a pathloss offset field mapped to a second pathloss offset value in a preconfigured table) Regarding claim 16, SHAH discloses: A base station (BS) (gNB 110) in a communication system (wireless communications architecture 100), . . . transmit, via higher layer signaling, a first configuration of a list of transmission configuration indication (TCI) states, (¶ 0138: At 1701, the UE receives transmission configuration indicator (TCI) state information specifying an indicated TCI state set including one or more activated TCI states; ¶ 0004: [T]he unified TCI framework simplifies signaling is by allowing the base station to indicate the transmission parameters for different reference signals using a single TCI field in the downlink control information (DCI); ¶ 0028: Unified TCI state pools may be configured via higher-layer signaling; ¶ 0037: After the UE receives a higher-layer configuration of unified TCI states, such via RRC configuration, and before application of an indicated TCI state from the configured TCI states) transmit a first medium access control (MAC) control element (CE) mapping TCI states among the TCI states in the list to codepoints of a TCI field in downlink control information (DCI), (¶ 0031: The signaling medium that is used to update unified TCI state may be a UE-specific DCI with or without PDSCH assignment. The unified TCI state may be indicated by a codepoint value in a TCI field of DCI format 1_1 or 1_2, wherein the codepoint value maps to one or more activated unified TCI states (e.g., up to 8 activated states) activated by MAC CE command. Each of codepoint values may be mapped to a joint DL/UL TCI state, a pair of DL and UL TCI states, a DL-only TCI state for separate DL/UL TCI states, or a UL-only TCI state for separate DL/UL TCI states; ¶ 0004: [T]he unified TCI framework simplifies signaling is by allowing the base station to indicate the transmission parameters for different reference signals using a single TCI field in the downlink control information (DCI)) transmit the DCI including the TCI field with a codepoint, and (¶ 0031: The signaling medium that is used to update unified TCI state may be a UE-specific DCI with or without PDSCH assignment. The unified TCI state may be indicated by a codepoint value in a TCI field of DCI format 1_1 or 1_2, wherein the codepoint value maps to one or more activated unified TCI states (e.g., up to 8 activated states) activated by MAC CE command. Each of codepoint values may be mapped to a joint DL/UL TCI state, a pair of DL and UL TCI states, a DL-only TCI state for separate DL/UL TCI states, or a UL-only TCI state for separate DL/UL TCI states; ¶ 0004: [T]he unified TCI framework simplifies signaling is by allowing the base station to indicate the transmission parameters for different reference signals using a single TCI field in the downlink control information (DCI)) receive a first uplink transmission associated with first transmission power, (¶ 0139: At 1804, the UE applies a configuration of the default TCI state to carry out at least one of uplink (UL) transmissions; ¶ 0004: [T]he unified TCI framework simplifies signaling is by allowing the base station to indicate the transmission parameters for different reference signals using a single TCI field in the downlink control information (DCI)) . . . SHAH does not appear to explicitly disclose: the BS comprising: a transceiver; and a processor coupled with the transceiver and configured to: wherein the first transmission power is based on a pathloss offset value included in a TCI state indicated by the codepoint. In the same field of endeavor, however, CIRIK teaches: the BS comprising: (computing device 1530) a transceiver; and (network interface 1539) a processor (processor 1531) coupled with the transceiver and configured to: wherein the first transmission power is based on a pathloss offset value included in a TCI state indicated by the codepoint. (¶ 0350: [T]he first TCI state may comprise/have/indicate/provide the first pathloss offset value) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify SHAH’s transmission configuration indicator (TCI) framework to provide pathloss offset value as taught by CIRIK to the wireless device may determine a pathloss offset for determination of the transmission power for the uplink-only communication, so as to reduce the interference and/or increase the data rate. See CIRIK, at ¶ 0202. Regarding claim 17, the combination of SHAH and CIRIK, as applied above, renders obvious the BS of claim 16. SHAH does not appear to explicitly disclose: wherein at least some of the TCI states in the list respectively include pathloss offset values. In the same field of endeavor, however, CIRIK teaches: wherein at least some of the TCI states in the list respectively include pathloss offset values. (¶ 0350: [T]he first TCI state may comprise/have/indicate/provide the first pathloss offset value; ¶ 0004: [A] wireless device may receive one or more configuration parameters (e.g., a state list and/or pathloss offset values associated with the state list)) Regarding claim 18, the combination of SHAH and CIRIK, as applied above, renders obvious the BS of claim 16. SHAH further discloses: wherein the processor is further configured to transmit, via the higher layer signaling, a second configuration of unified TCI state type, wherein, in case that the second configuration indicates joint, the TCI states in the list are joint TCI states for uplink and downlink operation, and wherein, in case that the second configuration indicates separate, the TCI states in the list are uplink TCI states. (¶ 0028: Unified TCI state pools may be configured via higher-layer signaling for each bandwidth part (BWP)/component carrier (CC). In general, TCI states for DL and UL transmission may be configured from separate pools, although in case of joint DL/UL TCI states, the same DL TCI state pool may be shared for UL transmissions, as well. That is, the unified TCI state may be either a joint DL/UL TCI state (i.e. JointULDL type), which means the serving cell is configured with a single pool for both DL and UL operations (DLorJoint-TCIState-r17), or a pair of separate DL and UL TCI states (i.e. separateULDL type), which means the serving cell may be configured with two pools, one pool for DL operation (DLorJoint-TCIState-r17) and one pool for UL operation (UL-TCIState-r17)) Regarding claim 19, the combination of SHAH and CIRIK, as applied above, renders obvious the BS of claim 16. SHAH does not appear to explicitly disclose: wherein the processor is further configured to: transmit a second MAC CE to update the pathloss offset value, and receive second uplink transmission associated with second transmission power, wherein the second transmission power is based on an updated pathloss offset value associated with the second MAC CE. In the same field of endeavor, however, CIRIK teaches: transmit a second MAC CE to update the pathloss offset value, and receive second uplink transmission associated with second transmission power, wherein the second transmission power is based on an updated pathloss offset value associated with the second MAC CE. (¶ 0460: FIG. 24 shows an example method for pathloss offset update control command in wireless communication. . . . At step 2406, the wireless device may receive (e.g., from a base station) a message (e.g., a medium-access control (MAC) control element (CE)), wherein the MAC-CE may comprise a serving cell identifier indicating the cell, a bandwidth part (BWP) indicator field indicating a BWP of the cell, a TCI state identifier indicating the first TCI state from the list of TCI states, and a pathloss offset field mapped to a second pathloss offset value in a preconfigured table. The preconfigured table may comprise pathloss offset values with increments of a step size. At step 2408, the wireless device may send, via the cell, (e.g., to the base station) second uplink transmissions using a second transmission power, wherein the second transmission power may be determined based on the pathloss reference signal associated with the first TCI state, and the second pathloss offset value indicated by the MAC CE) Regarding claim 20, the combination of SHAH and CIRIK, as applied above, renders obvious the BS of claim 19. CIRIK further discloses: wherein the second MAC CE includes at least one of: a serving cell identifier (ID) field; an uplink bandwidth part (BWP) ID field; a pathloss reference signal ID field; a pathloss reference signal group field; an activated pathloss reference signal ID field; a pathloss offset value field; or a TCI state field. (¶ 0460: [T]he MAC-CE may comprise a serving cell identifier indicating the cell, a bandwidth part (BWP) indicator field indicating a BWP of the cell, a TCI state identifier indicating the first TCI state from the list of TCI states, and a pathloss offset field mapped to a second pathloss offset value in a preconfigured table) Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the Examiner should be directed to Garth D Richmond whose telephone number is (703)756-4559. The Examiner can normally be reached M-F 8 a.m. - 5 p.m. ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, Applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the Examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the Examiner’s supervisor, Kathy Wang-Hurst can be reached at 571-270-5371. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GARTH D RICHMOND/Examiner, Art Unit 2644 /KATHY W WANG-HURST/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2644
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 03, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745083
Security Parameter Updates during Cell-Reselection for NR SDT
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12739823
METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING MESSAGE B IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM AND APPARATUS THEREFOR
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12739825
TRANSPORT BLOCK SIZE DETERMINATION IN COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12732924
METHOD FOR DETERMINING PROPAGATION DELAYS
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12696242
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SELECTING TRANSMISSION RESOURCE IN INTERNET OF VEHICLES, AND TERMINAL
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+24.8%)
3y 1m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 28 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month