Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 19/044,100

MOVER SYNCHRONIZATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 03, 2025
Examiner
SINGH, KAVEL
Art Unit
3651
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Rockwell Automation Technologies Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
1106 granted / 1322 resolved
+31.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
1348
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
50.7%
+10.7% vs TC avg
§102
39.1%
-0.9% vs TC avg
§112
8.1%
-31.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1322 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Stamm U.S. Patent No. 6,705,523. Claims 1, 14, and 20, Stamm teaches a system of mover synchronization Figs. 1-2, comprising: a track-based mover C4 L60-65; a non-track-based mover 130,132; and one or more processors 100,104 coupled with memory C4 L13-35 to: obtain a track coordinate of the track-based mover on a track of 106,108 via 112,114 C4 L53-67; obtain a non-track coordinate of the non-track-based mover 130,132 C5 L18-40; provide a first control signal via 100 to cause the track-based mover to arrive at the track coordinate within a first time range C6 L30-65; provide a second control signal to cause the non-track-based mover 130,132 to arrive at the non-track coordinate within a second time range C6 L30-65; and provide a third control signal to cause the track-based mover to transfer a payload to the non-track-based mover 130,132 with the track-based mover located at the track coordinate and the non-track-based mover located at the non-track coordinate C6 L64-67; C7 L1-15. Claims 2 and 15, Stamm teaches one or more processors 100,104 coupled with memory C4 L13-35 to: determine a presence of the payload; confirm location of the track-based mover at the track coordinate within the first time range C6 L30-65; confirm location of the non-track-based mover via 104 at the non-track coordinate within the second time range C6 L30-65; determine an orientation of the non-track-based mover; and provide the third control signal, based on the orientation of the non-track-based mover C6 L10-23. Claims 3 and 16, Stamm teaches one or more sensors 152,154,156: detect the non-track-based mover 130,132, the track-based mover, and the payload; and compare a parameter of the payload with a threshold parameter to determine that the payload satisfies the threshold parameter C8 L5-25; C8 L58-67; C9 L1-25. Claims 4 and 17, Stamm teaches a conveyor 106,108; the one or more processors 100,104 coupled with memory C4 L13-35 to: cause the conveyor 106,108 to transfer the payload from the non-track-based mover 130,132 to the track-based mover of 106,108 with the track-based mover located at the position of the track corresponding to the track coordinate and the non-track-based mover 130,132 located at the position corresponding to the non-track coordinate C8 L58-67; C9 L1-25. Claim 5, Stamm teaches the track of 106,108 including a rail-based track (as known to be used in conveyor systems); and the one or more processors 100,104 coupled with memory C4 L13-35 to provide a control signal to cause a segment of the track located at the position of the track corresponding to the track coordinate to move from a first position to a second position to deposit the payload on to the non-track-based mover 130,132 with the track based mover located at a position of the track corresponding to the track coordinate C8 L58-67; C9 L1-25. Claims 6 and 18, Stamm teaches the one or more processors 100,104 coupled with memory C4 L13-35: provide the first control signal to cause the track-based mover to follow a first path to arrive at a track coordinate within the first time range C6 L30-65; provide the second control signal to cause the non-track-based mover 130,132 to follow a second path to arrive at a non-track coordinate within the second time range C6 L30-65; and provide the third control signal to cause the non-track-based mover 130,132 to transfer a payload to the track-based mover 106,108 with the track-based mover 106,108 located at the track coordinate and the non-track-based mover 130,132 located at the non-track coordinate C8 L5-25; C8 L58-67; C9 L1-25. Claim 7, Stamm teaches the track-based mover of 106,108 including a first local data processing system via 100,104 to receive the first control signal and to generate a local control signal to navigate the track-based mover 130,132 to a position of the track of 106,108 corresponding to the track coordinate; and the non-track-based mover 130,132 including a second local data processing system 104 to receive the second control signal and to generate a local control signal to navigate the track-based mover to a position corresponding to the non-track coordinate C8 L5-25; C8 L58-67; C9 L1-25. Claim 8, Stamm teaches a plurality of non-track-based movers 130,132; and a plurality of track-based movers of 106,108. Claim 9, Stamm teaches the track-based mover of 106,108 is a first track-based mover, comprising: a plurality of track-based movers of 106,108 including the first track-based mover C4 L53-67; and the one or more processors 100,104 coupled with memory C4 L13-35 to provide a control signal to orient the plurality of track-based movers in a convoy formation C8 L5-25; C8 L58-67; C9 L1-25. Claim 10, Stamm teaches the one or more processors 100,104 coupled with memory C4 L13-35 to: provide the third control signal to cause the track-based mover to transfer the payload to the non-track-based mover 130,132 with the track-based mover maintaining a threshold velocity during a time period of the transfer with the track-based mover located at the track coordinate and the non-track-based mover 130,132 located at the non-track coordinate C8 L5-25; C8 L58-67; C9 L1-25. Claim 11, Stamm teaches the track-based mover is a first track-based mover, comprising: a first track-based mover C4 L60-65; a second track-based mover C4 L60-65; and the one or more processors 100,104 coupled with memory C4 L13-35 to provide a control signal to orient the first track-based mover and the second track-based mover such that the back end of the first track-based mover is within a threshold distance of the front of the second track-based mover via 112,114 C8 L5-25; C8 L58-67; C9 L1-25. Claim 12, Stamm teaches the track-based mover C4 L60-65 is a first track-based mover, comprising: a plurality of track-based movers C4 L60-65 including the first track-based mover C4 L60-65; the one or more processors 100,104 coupled to memory to provide a control signal to cause the first track-based mover to adjust its velocity C8 L5-25; C8 L58-67; C9 L1-25. Claims 13 and 19, Stamm teaches the one or more processors 100,104 coupled to memory C4 L13-35 to provide the third control signal to cause the non-track-based mover 130,132 to transfer the payload to the track-based mover C4 L60-65 with the track-based mover maintaining a threshold velocity during a time period of the transfer with the non-track-based mover located at a position corresponding to the non-track coordinate and the track-based mover located at a position corresponding to the track coordinate C8 L5-25; C8 L58-67; C9 L1-25. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KAVEL SINGH whose telephone number is (571)272-2362. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 8am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gene Crawford can be reached at (571) 272-6911. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KAVEL SINGH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3651 KS
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 03, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Sep 04, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12722901
CONVEYOR COMPONENT WITH FLEXIBLE HUB AND CONVEYOR ASSEMBLY
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12723623
BEARING POSITIONING STRUCTURE WITHOUT RADIAL INTERFERENCE FIT
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12715699
IFLEX CONVEYOR SYSTEM WITH GAPPING CAPABILITY FOR EFFICIENT PRODUCT TRANSFER HAVING RIVETED X-BRACE
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12715698
TRANSFER TABLE
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12715711
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ASSISTING IN OBJECT GRASPING FROM CONTAINERS IN OBJECT PROCESSING SYSTEMS
1y 11m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+14.0%)
2y 2m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1322 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month