Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/044,685

INTELLIGENT AND PROACTIVE DEVICE VULNERABILITY DETECTION AND PROTECTION

Final Rejection §DOUBLEPATENT
Filed
Feb 04, 2025
Priority
May 24, 2022 — continuation of 12/244,628
Examiner
TO, BAOTRAN N
Art Unit
2435
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Plume Design Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
580 granted / 673 resolved
+28.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
686
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
14.7%
-25.3% vs TC avg
§103
38.4%
-1.6% vs TC avg
§102
16.0%
-24.0% vs TC avg
§112
12.8%
-27.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 673 resolved cases

Office Action

§DOUBLEPATENT
DETAILED ACTION This Office action is responsive to the Response filed on 08/06/2026. Claims 1-20 are presented for examination. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 05/15/2026. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claims 12-20 are objected to because of the following informalities: “The method of claim” in line 1 should be --- The medium of claim ---. Appropriate correction is required. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the claims at issue are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP §§ 706.02(l)(1) - 706.02(l)(3) for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/forms/. The filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to http://www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over Claims 1-20 of U. S. Patent No. 12,244,628. Although the conflicting claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the examined claims contain elements of the patent claims, therefore, the examined claim is anticipated by the patent claim as follows: Current Application No. 19/044,685 US Patent No. 12,244,628 Independent Claim 1 Independent Claim 11 Independent Claim 11 Independent Claim 1 Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-20 would be allowable if the Terminal Disclaimer is filed to overcome the Double Patenting rejection, set forth in this Office action. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pages 5-8 of Amendment’s Remarks, filed on 08/06/2026, with respect to claims 1-20 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The 101 rejection of claims 1-20 has been withdrawn. The 102 rejection of claims 1-20 has been withdrawn. Applicant requests that the Office holds the Double Patenting rejection in abeyance until the claims are otherwise indicated to be in condition for allowance. Therefore, the Double Patenting rejection is maintained. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure (see PTO-892). THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BAOTRAN N TO whose telephone number is (571)272-8156. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9-5 ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amir Mehrmanesh can be reached at 571-270-3351. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BAOTRAN N TO/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2435
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 04, 2025
Application Filed
May 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DOUBLEPATENT
Aug 06, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 16, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §DOUBLEPATENT (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12764528
MANAGING SIMULTANEOUS USE OF PRIVATE WIRELESS LOCAL AREA NETWORKS AND CELLULAR RADIO-BASED NETWORKS
3y 4m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12764112
SECURITY VERIFICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS
1y 11m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12750209
CLUSTER ENCRYPTION DURING DEPLOYMENT
1y 12m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12732503
METHODS AND DEVICES FOR CONTROLLING A SMART DEVICE
5y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12732349
POST QUANTUM KEY ENCAPSULATION MECHANISM BASED SUCI ENCRYPTION
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+12.3%)
2y 5m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 673 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month