Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 19/046,297

CAMERA ARRANGEMENT FOR VEHICLES

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 05, 2025
Priority
Feb 05, 2024 — EU 24155847
Examiner
HUANG, FRANK F
Art Unit
2485
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Einride Autonomous Technologies AB
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
533 granted / 705 resolved
+17.6% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
729
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
91.9%
+51.9% vs TC avg
§102
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§112
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 705 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-7, 9-10, 12-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over MEYHOFERet al. US Pub. No.: 2017/0177000 A1 “Meyhofer”, in view of MURZYN, US Pub. No.: US 2019/0244446 “MURZYN”. Regarding claim 1, MEYHOFER discloses an apparatus for use in a vehicle (MEYHOFER, abstract), comprising: at least one processing core and at least one memory storing instructions that, when executed by the at least one processing core, cause the apparatus at least to (MEYHOFER, ¶ 0016-0019); send control information to control an at least in part transparent screen placed, or configured to be placed, at least in part in a field of view of a video sensor element of the vehicle (MEYHOFER, fig. 2, "210", "212", ¶ 0010); select an area of the screen which encompasses a part, or all of the screen (MEYHOFER, claim 1), and determine the control information so that the screen, when acting on the control information, transmits light through parts of the screen not comprised in the selected area (MEYHOFER, claim 2) and blocks (MEYHOFER, claim 3) or distorts light passing through the selected area toward the video sensor element (MEYHOFER, claims 1). It is noted that MEYHOFER is silent about as claimed. However, MURZYN discloses determine the control information (MURZYN, fig. 1, ¶ 23) such that the screen (MURZYN, Fig. 1), when acting on the control information (MURZYN, fig. 1, ¶ 23), displays one or more indicators visible to the video sensor element (MURZYN, ¶ 24). Both MEYHOFER and MURZYN teach systems with capturing images from a display, and those systems are comparable to that of the instant application. Because the two cited references are analogous to the instant application, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains, to include in the MEYHOFER disclosure, with information controlled by the control system as an indicator to an imaging sensor, as taught by MURZYN. Such inclusion would have increased the usefulness of the system by an improved system for monitoring operation of an vehicle. and would have been consistent with the rationale of combining prior art elements according to known methods to yield predictable results to show a prima facie case of obviousness (MPEP 2143(I)(A)) under KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 127 S. Ct. 1727, 82 USPQ2d 1385, 1395-97 (2007). Regarding claim 2, MEYHOFER/MURZYN, for the same motivation of combination, further discloses the apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the screen is capable of blocking light from passing through the screen in a configurable manner, and/or wherein the screen is capable of emitting light in the configurable manner (see MEYHOFER, claim 1). Regarding claim 3, MEYHOFER/MURZYN, for the same motivation of combination, further discloses the apparatus according to claim 1 claim 1 or 2, wherein the apparatus is configured to receive a video feed from the video sensor element or a second video sensor element, and to perform the selecting of the area based at least in part on the video feed (see MEYHOFER, ¶ 0021, and claims 2) Regarding claim 4, MEYHOFER/MURZYN, for the same motivation of combination, further discloses the apparatus according to claim 3, further configured to detect, based on the video feed, at least one bright light source in the video feed, and to select the area of the screen such that the selected area blocks the bright light source from the video sensor element (MEYHOFER, ¶ 0025, claim 3) Regarding claim 5 MEYHOFER/MURZYN, for the same motivation of combination, further discloses the apparatus according to claim 4, further configured to update the selection of the area to maintain the area (MEYHOFER, ¶ 27) between the bright light source and the video sensor element (MEYHOFER, 0026, claim 3) Regarding claim 6, MEYHOFER/MURZYN, for the same motivation of combination, further discloses the apparatus according to claim 5, further configured to update the selection of the area to maintain the area between the bright light source and the video sensor element based at least in part on a planned movement of the vehicle or a detected movement of the vehicle (MURZYN, ¶ 17) Regarding claim 7, MEYHOFER/MURZYN, for the same motivation of combination, discloses the apparatus according to claim 1, configured to determine the control information such that the screen, when acting on the control information, adjusts a light sensitivity of a field of view of the video sensor element (MURZYN, ¶ 18). Regarding claim 9, MEYHOFER/MURZYN, for the same motivation of combination, further discloses the apparatus according to claim 1 claim 8, configured to determine the control information such that the screen, when acting on the control information, displays a predetermined indicator sequence (MURZYN, ¶ 23). Regarding claim 10, MEYHOFER/MURZYN, for the same motivation of combination, further discloses the apparatus according to claim 1 any of claims 8-9, configured to determine the control information such that the screen, when acting on the control information, displays an indicator of an operating parameter of the vehicle (MURZYN, ¶ 17). Regarding claim 12, MEYHOFER/MURZYN, for the same motivation of combination, further discloses the apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the vehicle is an autonomous vehicle (see MEYHOFER, ¶ 0001, 0008.) Regarding claim 13, MEYHOFER/MURZYN, for the same motivation of combination, further discloses the apparatus according to claim 1 a, wherein the vehicle is a remotely operated vehicle (MEYHOFER, claim 1). Regarding claim 14, MEYHOFER/MURZYN, for the same motivation of combination, discloses a method in a vehicle, comprising: sending control information to control an at least in part transparent screen placed, or configured to be placed, at least in part in a field of view of a video sensor element of the vehicle; selecting an area of the screen which encompasses a part, or all, of the screen (see rejection of claim 1); determining the control information so that the screen, when acting on the control information, transmits light through parts of the screen not comprised in the selected area and blocks or distorts light passing through the selected area toward the video sensor element (see rejection of claim 1); and determining the control information such that the screen, when acting on the control information, displays one or more indicators visible to the video sensor element (see rejection of claim 1); and determining the control information such that the screen, when acting on the control information, displays one or more indicators visible to the video sensor element (see rejection of claim 1). Regarding claim 15, MEYHOFER/MURZYN, for the same motivation of combination, discloses a non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon a set of computer readable instructions that, when executed by at least one processor, cause an apparatus for a vehicle to at least: send control information to control an at least in part transparent screen placed, or configured to be placed, at least in part in a field of view of a video sensor element of a vehicle (see rejection of claim 1); select an area of the screen which encompasses a part, or all, of the screen; determine the control information so that the screen, when acting on the control information, transmits light through parts of the screen not comprised in the selected area and blocks or distorts light passing through the selected area toward the video sensor element (see rejection of claim 1); and determine the control information such that the screen, when acting on the control information, displays one or more indicators visible to the video sensor element (see rejection of claim 1); and determining the control information such that the screen, when acting on the control information, displays one or more indicators visible to the video sensor element (see rejection of claim 1). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 11 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: US 11082630 B2 Vehicular vision system using adaptive mask at camera US 20210114439 A1 VEHICULAR VISION SYSTEM WITH GLARE REDUCING WINDSHIELD US 20200319022 A1 STRAY-LIGHT TESTING STATION US 10791324 B1 On-car stray-light testing cart US 20200298871 A1 VEHICLE, CONTROL SYSTEM OF VEHICLE, AND CONTROL METHOD OF VEHICLE Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FRANK F HUANG whose telephone number is (571)272-0701. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8:30 am - 6:00 pm (Eastern Time), Federal Alternative First Friday Off. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jay Patel can be reached at (571)272-2988.. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FRANK F HUANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2485
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 05, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637120
ARRANGEMENT AND METHOD FOR OPTICALLY CAPTURING A TRACK
2y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12641290
EFFICIENT TRANSFORM SIGNALING FOR SMALL BLOCKS
1y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12641200
CAMERA LISTING BASED ON COMPARISON OF IMAGING RANGE COVERAGE INFORMATION TO EVENT-RELATED DATA GENERATED BASED ON CAPTURED IMAGE
1y 4m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12634457
VIDEO SIGNAL ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND DEVICE THEREFOR
1y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12627879
NEAR INFRARED (NIR) TRANSPARENT ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (OLED) DISPLAY
1y 7m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+15.9%)
2y 7m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 705 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month