Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 19/046,692

LIGHT EMITTING APPARATUS, WEARABLE DEVICE, DISPLAY APPARATUS, PHOTOELECTRIC CONVERSION APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, ILLUMINATION APPARATUS, AND MOVING BODY

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Feb 06, 2025
Priority
Feb 15, 2024 — JP 2024-021450
Examiner
CRAWLEY, KEITH L
Art Unit
2626
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Canon Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
355 granted / 598 resolved
-2.6% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+25.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
629
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
58.4%
+18.4% vs TC avg
§102
20.9%
-19.1% vs TC avg
§112
15.6%
-24.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 598 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4, 6, 13-16, 19-20, and 22-24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Saeki et al. (US 2020/0410919). Regarding claim 1, Saeki discloses a light emitting apparatus comprising: a plurality of light emitting devices (abstract, figs. 1-2, ¶ 2, ¶ 15-18, display elements 6); a plurality of conversion circuits provided in correspondence with the plurality of light emitting devices, respectively (figs. 1-2, ¶ 19-22, decoders 26); and a voltage generator configured to generate a plurality of reference voltages (figs. 1-2, ¶ 19-22, grayscale voltage generator 21), wherein each of the plurality of conversion circuits converts, using the plurality of reference voltages generated by the voltage generator, a digital signal supplied from an outside into an analog signal for driving one corresponding light emitting device of the plurality of light emitting devices (figs. 1-2, ¶ 17-22, decoder outputs voltage based on digital-to-analog conversion of pixel data from host), wherein at least one reference voltage of the plurality of reference voltages is supplied from the voltage generator to each of the plurality of conversion circuits via a buffer circuit (figs. 1-3, ¶ 19-26, gamma assist circuits 24; see also fig. 4, ¶ 27-39, source follower circuit 34 disclosed), wherein the plurality of conversion circuits include a first group of conversion circuits to which the at least one reference voltage is supplied via a first buffer circuit, and a second group of conversion circuits to which the at least one reference voltage is supplied via a second buffer circuit (figs. 1-3, ¶ 19-26, groups of decoders 26 with gamma assist circuits 24; see also fig. 4, ¶ 27-39, source follower circuit 34 disclosed), and wherein the first buffer circuit and the second buffer circuit are connected in series, and an output of the first buffer circuit is input to the second buffer circuit (figs. 1-3, ¶ 19-26, gamma assist circuits 24; see also fig. 4, ¶ 27-39, source follower circuit 34 disclosed). Regarding claim 2, Saeki discloses wherein the plurality of conversion circuits include not less than two conversion circuits to which the at least one reference voltage is supplied via a common buffer circuit (figs. 1-3, ¶ 19-26, groups of decoders 26 with gamma assist circuits 24). Regarding claim 3, Saeki discloses wherein the plurality of reference voltages generated by the voltage generator include a first reference voltage and a second reference voltage (figs. 1-2, ¶ 19-22, voltages V1-Vm; see also fig. 6, ¶ 45-46), and wherein for the first reference voltage, a common buffer circuit is provided for every first number of conversion circuits, and for the second reference voltage, a common buffer circuit is provided for every second number of conversion circuits different from the first number (fig. 6, ¶ 45-46, e.g., relative to grayscale voltage generator, circuits 24A placed after one group of decoders 26, circuits 24B placed after two groups of decoders 26). Regarding claim 4, Saeki discloses wherein the plurality of conversion circuits include not less than two conversion circuits to which the at least one reference voltage is supplied via different buffer circuits (figs. 1-3, ¶ 19-26, groups of decoders 26 with gamma assist circuits 24). Regarding claim 6, Saeki discloses wherein an area of the first buffer circuit is larger than an area of the second buffer circuit (fig. 6, ¶ 45-46, e.g., for p≠2, circuit 24A may be larger than circuit 24B). Regarding claim 13, Saeki discloses wherein the plurality of conversion circuits include the first group of conversion circuits and the second group of conversion circuits, and wherein the voltage generator is provided for each of the first group of conversion circuits and the second group of conversion circuits (figs. 1-3, ¶ 19-26, grayscale voltage generator 21 and groups of decoders 26). Regarding claim 14, Saeki discloses wherein each of the plurality of conversion circuits includes a holding circuit configured to temporarily hold the at least one reference voltage supplied from the voltage generator (fig. 4, ¶ 27-39, holding node disclosed), and after the holding circuit holds the at least one reference voltage, converts the digital signal into the analog signal using the at least one reference voltage held in the holding circuit (fig. 4, ¶ 27-39, holding node disclosed; see also figs. 1-2, ¶ 17-22). Regarding claim 15, Saeki discloses wherein an operation of the buffer circuit is stopped during a period in which the at least one reference voltage is held in the holding circuit (figs. 4-5, ¶ 27-40, grayscale voltage written into holding node during period other than that gamma assist operation period). Regarding claim 16, Saeki discloses wherein a plurality of buffer circuits provided for one reference voltage of the plurality of reference voltages use the same power supply, and buffer circuits provided for one reference voltage of the plurality of reference voltages and buffer circuits provided for other reference voltages use different power supplies (fig. 6, ¶ 45-46, circuits 24A and 24B; see fig. 4, ¶ 27-39, e.g., power supplies AVDD and AVSS). Regarding claim 19, this claim is rejected under the same rationale as claims 1-3. Regarding claim 20, this claim is rejected under the same rationale as claims 1 and 4. Regarding claim 22, Saeki discloses a display apparatus including a light emitting apparatus defined in claim 1, and an active device connected to the light emitting apparatus (figs. 1-2, ¶ 2, ¶ 15-18, display panel with display driver disclosed). Regarding claim 23, Saeki discloses wherein the at least one reference voltage is supplied from the voltage generator to the first group of conversion circuits through the first buffer circuit (figs. 1-3, ¶ 19-26, groups of decoders 26 with gamma assist circuits 24; see also fig. 4, ¶ 27-39, source follower circuit 34 disclosed; see also fig. 6, ¶ 45-46), and wherein the at least one reference voltage is supplied from the voltage generator to the second group of conversion circuits through the first buffer circuit and the second buffer circuit in this order (figs. 1-3, ¶ 19-26, groups of decoders 26 with gamma assist circuits 24; see also fig. 4, ¶ 27-39, source follower circuit 34 disclosed; see also fig. 6, ¶ 45-46). Regarding claim 24, Saeki discloses wherein an output node of the first buffer circuit is connected to reference-voltage input nodes of the conversion circuits of the first group and to an input node of the second buffer circuit (figs. 1-3, ¶ 19-26, groups of decoders 26 with gamma assist circuits 24; see also fig. 4, ¶ 27-39, source follower circuit 34 disclosed; see also fig. 6, ¶ 45-46), and wherein an output node of the second buffer circuit is connected to reference-voltage input nodes of the conversion circuits of the second group (figs. 1-3, ¶ 19-26, groups of decoders 26 with gamma assist circuits 24; see also fig. 4, ¶ 27-39, source follower circuit 34 disclosed; see also fig. 6, ¶ 45-46). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 5, 7, 10-12, 18, and 25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Saeki in view of Lo (US 2023/0316983). Regarding claim 5, Saeki discloses wherein the first buffer circuit is constituted by a source follower formed by a MOS transistor and a current source (fig. 4, ¶ 27-39, source follower circuit 34 disclosed). Saeki fails to explicitly disclose the second buffer circuit is constituted by a unity gain buffer formed by a differential amplification circuit. Lo teaches the second buffer circuit is constituted by a unity gain buffer formed by a differential amplification circuit (figs. 2-4, ¶ 35-43, see also ¶ 47-54, basic and dynamic buffers disclosed; see also figs. 8-11, ¶ 71-78, unity gain op amps disclosed). Saeki and Lo are both directed to buffer circuits for reference voltage generating circuits. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the device of Saeki with the device of Lo since such a modification provides a general or basic buffer (Lo, ¶ 73) for rapidly settling and stabilizing gamma voltages (Lo, ¶ 3, ¶ 8), and voltage difference between source driver circuits may be reduced (Lo, ¶ 43). Regarding claim 7, Saeki fails to disclose wherein noise of the first buffer circuit is smaller than noise of the second buffer circuit. Lo teaches wherein noise of the first buffer circuit is smaller than noise of the second buffer circuit (figs. 2-4, ¶ 35-43, see also ¶ 47-54, dynamic buffers may be turned off; see also figs. 8-11, ¶ 71-78). Saeki and Lo are both directed to buffer circuits for reference voltage generating circuits. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the device of Saeki with the device of Lo since such a modification provides a general or basic buffer (Lo, ¶ 73) for rapidly settling and stabilizing gamma voltages (Lo, ¶ 3, ¶ 8), and voltage difference between source driver circuits may be reduced (Lo, ¶ 43). Regarding claim 10, Saeki fails to disclose wherein the voltage generator generates the plurality of reference voltages by a resistor string connected between two terminals, and wherein a voltage is applied to each of the two terminals via a buffer circuit. Lo teaches wherein the voltage generator generates the plurality of reference voltages by a resistor string connected between two terminals, and wherein a voltage is applied to each of the two terminals via a buffer circuit (figs. 3-4, ¶ 35-43, e.g., gamma resistor string disclosed, see also ¶ 47-54; see also figs. 14-15). Saeki and Lo are both directed to buffer circuits for reference voltage generating circuits. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the device of Saeki with the device of Lo since such a modification provides a general or basic buffer (Lo, ¶ 73) for rapidly settling and stabilizing gamma voltages (Lo, ¶ 3, ¶ 8), and voltage difference between source driver circuits may be reduced (Lo, ¶ 43). Regarding claim 11, Saeki discloses wherein the plurality of reference voltages generated by the voltage generator include a first reference voltage and a second reference voltage (figs. 1-2, ¶ 19-22, grayscale voltage generator 21). Saeki fails to disclose wherein the light emitting apparatus further comprises a second resistor string connected between an output terminal of the first reference voltage and an output terminal of the second reference voltage in the voltage generator, wherein each of the first reference voltage and the second reference voltage is input to the second resistor string via a buffer circuit, and wherein a plurality of voltages generated by the second resistor string are supplied to each of the plurality of conversion circuits. Lo teaches wherein the light emitting apparatus further comprises a second resistor string connected between an output terminal of the first reference voltage and an output terminal of the second reference voltage in the voltage generator (figs. 3-4, ¶ 35-43, e.g., gamma resistor string disclosed, see also ¶ 47-54; see also figs. 14-15), wherein each of the first reference voltage and the second reference voltage is input to the second resistor string via a buffer circuit (figs. 3-4, ¶ 35-43, see also ¶ 47-54, basic and dynamic buffers disclosed; see also figs. 14-15), and wherein a plurality of voltages generated by the second resistor string are supplied to each of the plurality of conversion circuits (figs. 2-4, ¶ 28-31). Saeki and Lo are both directed to buffer circuits for reference voltage generating circuits. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the device of Saeki with the device of Lo since such a modification provides a general or basic buffer (Lo, ¶ 73) for rapidly settling and stabilizing gamma voltages (Lo, ¶ 3, ¶ 8), and voltage difference between source driver circuits may be reduced (Lo, ¶ 43). Regarding claim 12, Saeki discloses wherein the plurality of conversion circuits include the first group of conversion circuits and the second group of conversion circuits (figs. 1-3, ¶ 19-26, groups of decoders 26 with gamma assist circuits 24). Lo further teaches wherein the second resistor string is provided for each of the first group of conversion circuits and the second group of conversion circuits (figs. 3-4, ¶ 35-43, e.g., gamma resistor string disclosed, see also ¶ 47-54; see also figs. 14-15). Regarding claim 18, Saeki discloses a plurality of buffer circuits provided for the plurality of reference voltages, respectively (figs. 1-3, ¶ 19-26, gamma assist circuits 24; see also fig. 4, ¶ 27-39). Saeki fails to disclose a second detector configured to detect an output offset value between the plurality of buffer circuits, and a controller configured to control the plurality of buffer circuits, wherein each of the plurality of buffer circuits includes an output offset adjustment mechanism, and wherein the controller controls an output of each buffer circuit by the output offset adjustment mechanism, based on a detection result of the second detector, such that the output offset value between the plurality of buffer circuits is corrected. Lo teaches a second detector configured to detect an output offset value between the plurality of buffer circuits, and a controller configured to control the plurality of buffer circuits, wherein each of the plurality of buffer circuits includes an output offset adjustment mechanism (figs. 1-4, ¶ 24, controller 23; see ¶ 35-43, see also ¶ 47-54, dynamic buffers may be turned off; see also figs. 8-11, 78-82, voltage detecting modules disclosed), and wherein the controller controls an output of each buffer circuit by the output offset adjustment mechanism, based on a detection result of the second detector, such that the output offset value between the plurality of buffer circuits is corrected (figs. 1-4, ¶ 24, controller 23; see ¶ 35-43, see also ¶ 47-54, dynamic buffers may be turned off; see also figs. 8-11, 78-82, voltage detecting modules disclosed to settle and stabilize gamma voltages). Saeki and Lo are both directed to buffer circuits for reference voltage generating circuits. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the device of Saeki with the device of Lo since such a modification provides a general or basic buffer (Lo, ¶ 73) for rapidly settling and stabilizing gamma voltages (Lo, ¶ 3, ¶ 8), and voltage difference between source driver circuits may be reduced (Lo, ¶ 43). Regarding claim 25, Saeki discloses wherein the plurality of reference voltages include a first reference voltage and a second reference voltage (figs. 1-2, ¶ 19-22, grayscale voltage generator 21), and wherein the buffer circuits connected to the second resistor string receive outputs of the buffer circuits connected to the first resistor string (figs. 1-3, ¶ 19-26, groups of decoders 26 with gamma assist circuits 24; see also fig. 4, ¶ 27-39, source follower circuit 34 disclosed; see also fig. 6, ¶ 45-46). Saeki fails to disclose wherein for the first group of conversion circuits, a first resistor string is connected between an output of a buffer circuit for the first reference voltage and an output of a buffer circuit for the second reference voltage, and voltages generated by the first resistor string are supplied to the conversion circuits of the first group, wherein for the second group of conversion circuits, a second resistor string is connected between an output of a buffer circuit for the first reference voltage and an output of a buffer circuit for the second reference voltage, and voltages generated by the second resistor string are supplied to the conversion circuits of the second group. Lo teaches wherein for the first group of conversion circuits, a first resistor string is connected between an output of a buffer circuit for the first reference voltage and an output of a buffer circuit for the second reference voltage, and voltages generated by the first resistor string are supplied to the conversion circuits of the first group (figs. 3-4, ¶ 35-43, e.g., gamma resistor string disclosed, see also ¶ 47-54; see also figs. 14-15), wherein for the second group of conversion circuits, a second resistor string is connected between an output of a buffer circuit for the first reference voltage and an output of a buffer circuit for the second reference voltage, and voltages generated by the second resistor string are supplied to the conversion circuits of the second group (figs. 3-4, ¶ 35-43, e.g., gamma resistor string disclosed, see also ¶ 47-54; see also figs. 14-15). Saeki and Lo are both directed to buffer circuits for reference voltage generating circuits. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the device of Saeki with the device of Lo since such a modification provides a general or basic buffer (Lo, ¶ 73) for rapidly settling and stabilizing gamma voltages (Lo, ¶ 3, ¶ 8), and voltage difference between source driver circuits may be reduced (Lo, ¶ 43). Claims 8, 9, and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Saeki in view of Kim et al. (US 2021/0193009). Regarding claim 8, Saeki fails to disclose wherein the at least one reference voltage is supplied to the first group of conversion circuits further via a third buffer circuit, wherein the at least one reference voltage is supplied to the second group of conversion circuits further via a fourth buffer circuit, and wherein the third buffer circuit and the fourth buffer circuit are connected in parallel. Kim teaches wherein the at least one reference voltage is supplied to the first group of conversion circuits further via a third buffer circuit, wherein the at least one reference voltage is supplied to the second group of conversion circuits further via a fourth buffer circuit, and wherein the third buffer circuit and the fourth buffer circuit are connected in parallel (fig. 3, ¶ 86-96, buffer circuits 124 and 224 connected in parallel; see also ¶ 104-105). Saeki and Kim are both directed to buffer circuits for reference voltage generating circuits. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the device of Saeki with the device of Kim since such a modification eliminates a deviation in output between driving chips in a display (Kim, ¶ 7, ¶ 105). Regarding claim 9, this claim is rejected under the same rationale as claim 8. Regarding claim 21, Saeki fails to disclose a wearable device including a display apparatus configured to display an image, wherein the display apparatus includes a light emitting apparatus defined in claim 1. Kim teaches a wearable device including a display apparatus configured to display an image, wherein the display apparatus includes a light emitting apparatus defined in claim 1 (¶ 4-7, small mobile communication terminal disclosed). Saeki and Kim are both directed to buffer circuits for reference voltage generating circuits. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the device of Saeki with the device of Kim since such a modification eliminates a deviation in output between driving chips in a display (Kim, ¶ 7, ¶ 105). Claim 17 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Saeki in view of Lim et al. (US 2022/0328012). Regarding claim 17, Saeki fails to disclose a first detector configured to detect an emission luminance in each of the plurality of light emitting devices, and a controller configured to control the buffer circuit, wherein the buffer circuit includes an output offset adjustment mechanism, and wherein the controller controls an output of the buffer circuit by the output offset adjustment mechanism, based on a detection result of the first detector, such that the emission luminance in each of the plurality of light emitting devices is corrected. Lim teaches a first detector configured to detect an emission luminance in each of the plurality of light emitting devices (abstract, figs. 4-5, ¶ 50-54, e.g., maximum luminance detected; see also ¶ 85-86, ¶ 112, ¶ 125, ¶ 141-146), and a controller configured to control the buffer circuit, wherein the buffer circuit includes an output offset adjustment mechanism, and wherein the controller controls an output of the buffer circuit by the output offset adjustment mechanism, based on a detection result of the first detector, such that the emission luminance in each of the plurality of light emitting devices is corrected (figs. 4-5, ¶ 50-54, e.g., maximum luminance detected; see also ¶ 85-86, ¶ 112, ¶ 125, ¶ 141-146, master/slave amplifiers enabled and/or disabled based on maximum luminance). Saeki and Lim are both directed to buffer circuits for reference voltage generating circuits. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the device of Saeki with the device of Lim since such a modification reduces power consumption (Lim, ¶ 5, ¶ 145). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 8/4/26 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Regarding claim 1, Applicant argues “Saeki’s gamma assist circuitry does not provide … at least one reference voltage of the plurality of reference voltages is supplied from the voltage generator to each of the plurality of conversion circuits via a buffer circuit, with the first buffer circuit and the second buffer circuit being connected in series as claimed” (Remarks, pp. 2-3). Examiner disagrees. As cited above, figs. 1-3 and ¶ 19-26 of Saeki show gamma assist circuits 24 serially connected with respect to each grayscale voltage (i.e., the output of a gamma assist circuit is connected to the input of a subsequent gamma assist circuit). Further, fig. 4 and ¶ 27-39 of Saeki discloses that each gamma assist unit circuit 28 comprises a source follower circuit 34 (i.e., a buffer circuit). Thus, Saeki discloses buffer circuits connected in series as is claimed. The rejection of the claims is maintained. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KEITH L CRAWLEY whose telephone number is (571)270-7616. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 10-6 ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Temesghen Ghebretinsae can be reached at 571-272-3017. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KEITH L CRAWLEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2626
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 06, 2025
Application Filed
May 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Aug 04, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 15, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12724483
CONTROL DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12718751
DISPLAY APPARATUS
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12718765
DISPLAY DEVICE AND DRIVING METHOD THEREOF
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12687944
ACTIVE STYLUS DOWNLINK SIGNAL TRANSMISSION TIMING CONTROL RELATIVE TO SENSOR CONTROLLER
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12674985
NEAR-EYE DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+25.7%)
3y 4m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 598 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month