Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/047,056

THREE-DIMENSIONAL DATA ENCODING METHOD, THREE-DIMENSIONAL DATA DECODING METHOD, THREE-DIMENSIONAL DATA ENCODING DEVICE, AND THREE-DIMENSIONAL DATA DECODING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Feb 06, 2025
Examiner
BRANIFF, CHRISTOPHER
Art Unit
2484
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Panasonic Intellectual Property Corporation of America
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
544 granted / 637 resolved
+27.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
665
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
§103
55.3%
+15.3% vs TC avg
§102
16.3%
-23.7% vs TC avg
§112
7.7%
-32.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 637 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-4 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1 and 4 of U.S. Patent No. 12,262,054 in view of Fu et al. (US 2019/0098305 A1, referred to herein as “Fu”). Claim 1 of Instant Application A three-dimensional data encoding method, comprising: calculating difference values each of which is a difference between (i) a value of attribute information of a three-dimensional point and (ii) a predicted value corresponding to the attribute information of the three-dimensional point; generating zero-run-length information indicating a number of consecutive zero difference values in a code sequence constituted by the difference values, each of the zero difference values indicating each of the difference values is zero; and generating a bitstream including the zero-run-length information, wherein the attribute information includes one or more components, each of the difference values includes one or more difference components corresponding to the one or more components, and each of the zero difference values includes the one or more difference components all of which are 0. Claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 12,262,054 A three-dimensional data encoding method, comprising: calculating difference values each of which is a difference between (i) a value of attribute information of a three-dimensional point and (ii) a predicted value corresponding to the attribute information of the three-dimensional point; generating information indicating a number of consecutive zero difference values in a code sequence constituted by the difference values, each of the zero difference values indicating each of the difference values is zero; and generating a bitstream including the information, wherein the attribute information includes components, each of the difference values includes difference components corresponding to the components, and the information indicates the total number of the zero difference values each including the difference components all of which are 0. Table 1. Regarding claim 1, claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 12,262,054 discloses many of the same or similar limitations as shown in Table 1. Claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 12,262,054 does not disclose generating zero-run-length information. However, Fu discloses generating zero-run-length information (Fu: paragraph [0041], disclosing zero-run-length coding for quantized coefficients and generation of associated syntax information). At the time the application was effectively filed, it would have been obvious for a person having ordinary skill in the art to use the zero-run-length coding of Fu in the method of claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 12,262,054. One would have been motivated to modify claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 12,262,054 in this manner in order to more efficiently process transform information in block-based coding (Fu: paragraphs [0004] and [0040] – [0041]). Regarding claim 3, the claim recites analogous limitations to claim 1, above, and is therefore rejected on the same premise. (Note that Fu discloses implementation via memory and processor in paragraphs [0235] – [0236].) Claim 2 of Instant Application A three-dimensional data decoding method, comprising: obtaining zero-run-length information from a bitstream, the zero- run-length information indicating a number of consecutive zero difference values in a code sequence constituted by difference values, each of the zero difference values indicating each of the difference values is zero, the difference values each being a difference between (i) a value of attribute information of a three-dimensional point and (ii) a predicted value corresponding to the attribute information of the three-dimensional point; and calculating each value of the attribute information by adding the predicted value to a difference value corresponding to the attribute information of the three-dimensional point, wherein the attribute information includes one or more components, each of the difference values includes one or more difference components corresponding to the one or more components, and each of the zero difference values includes the one or more difference components all of which are 0. Claim 4 of U.S. Patent No. 12,262,054 A three-dimensional data decoding method, comprising: obtaining information from a bitstream, the information indicating a number of consecutive zero difference values in a code sequence constituted by difference values, each of the zero difference values indicating each of the difference values is zero, the difference values each being a difference between (i) a value of attribute information of a three-dimensional point and (ii) a predicted value corresponding to the attribute information of the three-dimensional point; and calculating each value of the attribute information by adding the predicted value to a difference value corresponding to the attribute information of the three-dimensional point, wherein the attribute information includes components, each of the difference values includes difference components corresponding to the components, and the information indicates the total number of the zero difference values each including the difference components all of which are 0. Table 2. Regarding claim 2, claim 4 of U.S. Patent No. 12,262,054 discloses many of the same or similar limitations as shown in Table 2. Claim 4 of U.S. Patent No. 12,262,054 does not explicitly disclose obtaining zero-run-length information. However, Fu discloses obtaining zero-run-length information (Fu: paragraph [0041], disclosing zero-run-length coding for quantized coefficients and generation of associated syntax information). At the time the application was effectively filed, it would have been obvious for a person having ordinary skill in the art to use the zero-run-length coding of Fu in the method of claim 4 of U.S. Patent No. 12,262,054. One would have been motivated to modify claim 4 of U.S. Patent No. 12,262,054 in this manner in order to more efficiently process transform information in block-based coding (Fu: paragraphs [0004] and [0040] – [0041]). Regarding claim 4, the claim recites analogous limitations to claim 2, above, and is therefore rejected on the same premise. (Note that Fu discloses implementation via memory and processor in paragraphs [0235] – [0236].) Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Christopher Braniff whose telephone number is (571) 270-5009. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7AM to 4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thai Tran can be reached at (571) 272-7382. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. CHRISTOPHER T. BRANIFF Primary Examiner Art Unit 2484 /CHRISTOPHER BRANIFF/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2484
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 06, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598279
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROCESSING FRAME SEQUENCE AND SYSTEM FOR TREATING VISUAL DYSFUNCTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593067
PREDICTIVE CODING OF TEXTURE COORDINATES FOR POLYGON MESH COMPRESSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587627
METHODS AND SYSTEM OF MULTIVIEW VIDEO RENDERING, PREPARING A MULTIVIEW CACHE, AND REAL-TIME MULTIVIEW VIDEO CONVERSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586257
METHOD FOR ENCODING AND DECODING A 3D POINT CLOUD, ENCODER, DECODER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581115
GROUPING OF DUPLICATE VERTICES IN POSITION COMPRESSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+10.2%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 637 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month