Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/047,195

METHOD AND APPARATUS IN A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 06, 2025
Priority
Feb 08, 2024 — CN 202410178237.2 +1 more
Examiner
HUANG, DAVID S
Art Unit
2631
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
617 granted / 710 resolved
+24.9% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
727
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.7%
-33.3% vs TC avg
§103
38.6%
-1.4% vs TC avg
§102
18.7%
-21.3% vs TC avg
§112
22.7%
-17.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 710 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The references listed in the Information Disclosure Statement(s) filed on 5/22/2025 have been considered by the examiner (see attached PTO-1449 form or PTO/SB/08A and 08B forms). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 5-6, 10-11, 15-16, and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Niu et al. (US 2026/0039716, hereinafter “Niu”). Regarding claims 1 and 11, Niu discloses a device in a wireless communication system (Fig. 5), the device (terminal, Fig. 5, implemented as communication apparatus 300, Fig. 27, memory and processor to execute instructions, para. 0005) comprising: a transceiver (communication interface 303, Fig. 27); and a controller coupled with the transceiver (processor 302 connected to communication interface 303 via bus 304, Fig. 27) and configured to: receive, from a reader, first information for a device to reader (D2R) transmission (S202, base station sends system information to the terminal, the information including time domain resource info, and frequency domain resource info, para. 0100, Fig. 5); and transmit, to the reader, the D2R transmission based on the first information (S203, terminal sends response information for the system information to the base station, para. 0104, Fig. 5), wherein the first information includes at least one of information on a frequency domain resource, information on a time domain resource, or a chip duration (the information including time domain resource info and frequency domain resource info, para. 0100-0101). Regarding claims 6 and 16, Niu discloses a reader in a wireless communication system (base station in the system of Fig. 5, implemented as communication apparatus 300, Fig. 27, memory and processor to execute instructions, para. 0005), the reader comprising: a transceiver (communication interface 303, Fig. 27); and a controller coupled with the transceiver (processor 302 connected to communication interface 303 via bus 304, Fig. 27) and configured to: transmit, to a device, first information for a device to reader (D2R) transmission (S202, base station sends system information to the terminal, the information including time domain resource info, and frequency domain resource info, para. 0100, Fig. 5); and receive, from the device, the D2R transmission based on the first information (S203, terminal sends response information for the system information to the base station, para. 0104, Fig. 5), wherein the first information includes at least one of information on a frequency domain resource, information on a time domain resource, or a chip duration (the information including time domain resource info and frequency domain resource info, para. 0100-0101). Regarding claims 5, 10, 15, and 20, Niu further discloses receiving, from the reader, a paging message including at least one identifier of the device or an identifier of a group for multiple devices (auxiliary info also includes information related to a terminal that is paged or receives the auxiliary information including terminal identification, para. 0086, 0089-0090), Wherein the device includes an ambient-internet of things (A-IoT) device (AIoT Layer, of the terminal, Fig. 4). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 3, 8, 13, and 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Niu et al. (US 2026/0039716, hereinafter “Niu”) in view of Cheng et al. (US 2025/0150507, hereinafter “Cheng”). Regarding claims 3, 8, 13, and 18, Niu discloses everything applied to claim 1 above, but does not expressly disclose performing a modulation for the D2R transmission based on a modulation scheme, and wherein the modulation scheme includes an on-off keying (OOK) modulation scheme. Cheng also discloses an A-IoT system in which the Device to Reader (D2R) link employs on-off keying (OOK) for baseband modulation (para. 0150). Because both Niu and Cheng disclose A-IoT systems, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time the application was filed, to substitute one data processing scheme for another, for the predictable result of implementing OOK modulation for the D2R transmission, as suggested by Cheng. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2, 4, 7, 9, 12, 14, 17, 19 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID S HUANG whose telephone number is (571)270-1798. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hannah Wang can be reached at (571) 272-9018. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /David S Huang/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2631 6/27/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 06, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750104
BEAMFORMING PHASE CORRECTION IN A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION CIRCUIT
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12750261
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR PULSE SHAPED AND OVERLAPPED PHASE TRACKING REFERENCE SIGNALS
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744692
RECEIVER RECEIVING DATA SIGNAL OF MULTI-LEVEL AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEM INCLUDING THE SAME
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738972
SCHEDULER AND METHOD OF SCHEDULING SESSIONS IN A UWB COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12732319
FRAME EXCHANGE SEQUENCE FOR MULTI-AP COOPERATION
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+15.2%)
2y 5m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 710 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month