Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 19/048,019

Rifle case convertible into a shooting bench

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 07, 2025
Examiner
BUI, LUAN KIM
Art Unit
3736
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
1012 granted / 1469 resolved
-1.1% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+28.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
1495
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
37.4%
-2.6% vs TC avg
§102
28.0%
-12.0% vs TC avg
§112
27.5%
-12.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1469 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The claims are replete with indefinite language too numerous to mention specifically, and should be revised carefully. For example only, in claim 1, line 2, “two flaps” should be changed to --two side covers-- to provide proper antecedent basis for line 6. In claim 1, the phrases “the rifle stock” on line 3, “the sock seat” on line 5, “the centre”, “the case” on line 6, “the case” on line 7 lacks proper antecedent basis. In claim 1, the terms “A.”, “B.”, and “C.” should be replaced with --A), B), and C)-- respectively. In claim 1, line 9, the term “leg (5).” should be replaced with --leg (5); --. In claim 1, line 12, “release.” should be replaced with --release; and--. In claim 1, the phrase “the cover” (three places) on lines 14, 15 and 16 should be replaced with --the side cover--. In claim 1, line 16, “a shooting” should be replaced with --the shooting--. The term “conventional” in claim 1 is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term “conventional” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. It is unclear what features are encompassed in a “conventional rigid rifle case”. The claim(s) must be in one sentence form only. Note the format of the claims in the patent(s) cited. The applicant is required to make corrections to the claim wherever appropriate in order to clarify same. If applicant continues to prosecute the application, revision of the specification and claim to present the application in proper form is required. While an application can be amended to make it clearly understandable, no subject matter can be added that was not disclosed in the application as originally filed. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 1 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. This application is in condition for allowance except for the following formal as indicate above. Therefore, prosecution on the merits is closed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LUAN K BUI whose telephone number is (571)272-4552. The examiner can normally be reached Generally M-F, 7-4. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Orlando E. Avilés can be reached on 571-270-5531 or orlando.aviles-bosques@uspto.gov. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LUAN K BUI/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3736
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 07, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12589612
MODULAR DESKTOP CRAFT UTENSILS STORAGE SYSTEM FOR STORING CRAFT UTENSILS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589906
PACKAGE WITH PUSH TAB LOCKING MECHANISM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583658
CARRIER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581899
FILTER MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12575702
PRODUCT DISPENSER IN GEL OR CREAM FORM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+28.7%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1469 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month