Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/049,544

STORAGE DEVICE AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE STORAGE DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Feb 10, 2025
Priority
Jun 04, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0073150
Examiner
HO, HOAI V
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
SK hynix Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
93%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 93% — above average
93%
Career Allowance Rate
1030 granted / 1112 resolved
+32.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 8m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
1125
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
30.1%
-9.9% vs TC avg
§102
45.0%
+5.0% vs TC avg
§112
16.5%
-23.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1112 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 1. This office acknowledges receipt of the following item(s) from the Applicant: Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) was considered. 2. Claims 1-24 are presented for examination. Title 3. The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 4. Claims 8 and 10 recite the limitation “the memory controller” in lines 2 and 3-4, respectively. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 5. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. 6. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 7. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Nose et al. US Pub. No. 20220208270. As per claims 1, 6-7, 11, and 21-23, Fig. 6A of Nose is directed to a memory device, comprising: a memory block (220, par. 65, Fig. 6A) including a plurality of string groups (50, Fig. 4B) connected to a plurality of word lines (WL0-WLn) ; an operation processor (500, par. 84, Fig. 13) configured to set a program operation mode of the memory block to one of a single-level cell (SLC) mode (binary mode, par. 86, Fig. 19) and a multi- level cell (MLC) mode (MLC mode, par. 86, Fig. 19) in response to a command received externally from the memory device (Fig. 12A); and an address allocator (Fig. 19) configured to allocate a row address of the memory block differently depending on the program operation mode (par. 86). As per claims 2 and 12, a paragraph 64 of Nose discloses wherein the memory block stores 1 bit per unit memory cell in the SLC mode, and stores 2 or more bits per unit memory cell in the MLC mode. As per claims 3, 13, paragraphs 37, 39 or 96 and 86 of Nose discloses wherein the address allocator allocates the row address so that the program operation is performed on a string group (two or more strings) basis in the SLC mode (37, 39 or 96) and is performed on a word line basis in the MLC mode (par. 86). As per claims 4 and 14, Fig. 19 of Nose discloses wherein the address allocator allocates the row addresses based on the word line basis in the MLC mode by sequentially assigning the row addresses, respectively, to locations where string groups intersect with a target word line. As per claims 5 and 15, Fig. 19 of Nose discloses wherein the address allocator allocates the row addresses based on the string group basis in the SLC mode by sequentially assigning the row addresses, respectively, to locations where word lines intersect with a target string group. As per claims 8 and 18, a paragraph 86 and Figs. 19 and 20 of Nose disclose wherein the program order based on the row address is equally set by the memory controller in the SLC mode and the MLC mode, respectively. As per claims 9 and 19, Figs. 4A and 4B of Nose discloses wherein: a first string group (220) among the plurality of string groups comprises first strings sharing a first drain select line (32 or 44, par. 61), each of the first strings comprises a drain select transistor (S2, Fig. 4A) connected to the first drain select line, memory cells connected to the plurality of word lines (30), and a source select transistor (S1) connected to a first source select line (32), a second string group (another 220, Fig. 4B) among the plurality of string groups comprises second strings sharing a second drain select line (44, par. 61), and each of the second strings comprises a drain select transistor (S2) connected to the second drain select line, memory cells connected to the plurality of word lines, and a source select transistor (S1) connected to a second source select line. As per claims 10, 20, and 24 Fig. 4B and a paragraph 64 of Nose disclose wherein the operation processor erases a string group selected from among the plurality of string groups in response to a partial erase command received from the memory controller. 8. When responding to the office action, Applicants are advised to provide the examiner with the line numbers and page numbers in the application and/or references cited to assist the examiner to locate the appropriate paragraphs. 9. A shortened statutory period for response to this action is set to expire 3 (three) months and 0 (zero) day from the date of this letter. Failure to respond within the period for response will cause the application to become abandoned (see MPEP 710.02 (b)). 10. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HOAI V HO whose telephone number is (571)272-1777. The examiner can normally be reached 7:00 AM -- 5:30 PM from Thursday and Friday of the first week of a bi-week and Tuesday and Wednesday of the second week. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amir Zarabian can be reached on (571) 272-1852. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is (571)-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /HOAI V HO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2827
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 10, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12700436
COMPACT DATA LATCHES
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12700437
LOW POWER INTERMEDIATE PRE-CHARGE OPERATIONS IN MEMORY
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12694912
MEMORY CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENT FOR ACCURATE AND SECURE READ
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12677412
MEMORY, STORAGE APPARATUS, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12676197
DATA STORAGE DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD FOR NON-VOLATILE MEMORY
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
93%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+5.5%)
1y 8m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1112 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month