Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/050,782

CUTTING DEVICE FOR TRIGGER FINGER AND OTHER SOFT TISSUES

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 11, 2025
Priority
Apr 30, 2021 — provisional 63/182,259 +4 more
Examiner
GEIGER, RACHAEL L
Art Unit
3771
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Sonex Health Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
97 granted / 113 resolved
+15.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
146
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
83.8%
+43.8% vs TC avg
§102
10.9%
-29.1% vs TC avg
§112
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 113 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group II claims 13-19 in the reply filed on May 20, 2026 is acknowledged. Claims 2-12 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 13-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Mirza et al. (US 2014/0066964 A1). Regarding claim 13, Mirza discloses a device for cutting soft tissue in a hand of a patient, the device comprising: a handle 30; an introducer shaft 20 extending from the handle and having a distal portion (Fig. 4); a blade 80; and a slider 60, 70 rotatably attached to the handle and the blade (para. [0098], [0100]-[0101]), wherein the slider is configured to rotate relative to an upper surface of the handle (para. [0098], [0100]-[0101]) and slide along the handle to advance and retract the blade along the introducer shaft (para. [0095]). Regarding claim 14, Mirza discloses the device of claim 13, wherein the handle comprises at least one contoured area for placement of a user's fingers while holding the handle (i.e., 13A-F show a curvature of the handle such that the user can place their fingers around the device ergonomically). Regarding claim 15, Mirza discloses the device of claim 13. Mirza also discloses wherein the introducer shaft is flat (Fig. 4) and has an upward curve along the distal portion (i.e., upward curve is being defined as from the bottom of the channel slot to each of the upward curved walls that run along the longitudinal axis). Regarding claim 16, Mirza discloses the device of claim 13. Mirza also discloses wherein the blade includes a curved, proximally facing cutting surface (Fig. 5; para. [0093, 0095])). Regarding claim 17, Mirza discloses the device of claim 13. Mirza also discloses wherein the slider is attached to the handle via a hinge 61, and wherein the handle further comprises a track along which the slider slides (i.e., see Fig. 7, 70 moves through (and rotates with 60), the hollow body defining a lumen through which 70 passes). Regarding claim 18, Mirza discloses the device of claim 13. Mirza also discloses wherein the introducer shaft comprises: a guiding channel on a top surface of the introducer shaft 21; and a rotating channel within and deeper than the guiding channel (i.e., at 22 at the open end). Regarding claim 20, Mirza discloses the device of claim 18. Mirza also discloses wherein a distal end of the introducer shaft is rounded and is not configured to cut tissue (Fig. 2). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RACHAEL LYNN GEIGER whose telephone number is (571)272-6196. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8:00am-5:00pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Darwin Erezo can be reached at 5712724695. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RACHAEL L GEIGER/ Examiner, Art Unit 3771 /BROOKE LABRANCHE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3771
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 11, 2025
Application Filed
May 12, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12667349
FULL-THICKNESS RESECTION METHOD
3y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12667380
SURGICAL TOOL AND ASSEMBLY
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12653539
LEFT ATRIAL APPENDAGE CLOSURE DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12642533
LOCKING FEATURE FOR HEMOSTASIS CLIP
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12629170
SURGICAL INSTRUMENT GUIDE ASSEMBLY
3y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+13.3%)
2y 9m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 113 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month