Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/052,532

LOCALIZED TRACKING OF A VERTEBRAL BODY OR OTHER ANATOMIC STRUCTURE

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Feb 13, 2025
Examiner
NGANGA, BONIFACE N
Art Unit
3797
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Medos International Sàrl
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 9m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allow Rate
344 granted / 539 resolved
-6.2% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+30.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
588
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
§103
42.7%
+2.7% vs TC avg
§102
18.6%
-21.4% vs TC avg
§112
26.2%
-13.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 539 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-4 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 15-20 of U.S. Patent No. 12,251,168. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the pending claims are of a broad scope compared to the patented case and are therefore anticipated by the patented claims. Conclusion No prior art rejection is included in this Office action as the closest prior art are Berke US 20120265071 A1 and WO 2020145821 A1 to Overbeeke et al. cited by Applicant. Berke Figs. 3 and 4 disclose a surgical system and a cannula that determines position and orientation of the cannula. Overbeeke et al. discloses a cannula and a sensor coupled to a distal end of the cannula, wherein the position of the cannula, for example the distal end of the cannula may be determined with respect to the cannula insertion device and/or with respect to the human or animal body and/or with respect to one or more sensors to determine a one or more features or characteristics of the human or animal body, for example with respect to a contact sensor, such as a ultrasound transducer). None of the reference of record reasonable disclose and/or render obvious the combination of a cannula, navigation sensor coupled to a distal end of the cannula and comprising one or more tines configured to detect movement, and a controller configured to receive data from the navigation sensor indicating movement relative to the cannula, determine if the movement is indicative of a risk of skiving, and if the movement is indicative of a risk of skiving, generate an alert. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BONIFACE N NGANGA whose telephone number is (571)270-7393. The examiner can normally be reached Mon. - Thurs. 5:30 am - 4:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ANNE M KOZAK can be reached at (571) 270-0552. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BONIFACE N NGANGA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3797
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 13, 2025
Application Filed
Dec 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12588846
METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND DEVICES FOR DETERMINING A STATUS OF BRAIN AND/OR NERVE FUNCTIONS OF A PATIENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12564445
METHODS FOR OPERATING A MEDICAL CONTINUUM ROBOT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12564455
Systems And Methods For Controlling Robotic Movement Of A Tool Based On A Virtual Boundary
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12557993
Temperature Detection
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12551135
MOBILE ULTRAWIDEBAND RADAR FOR MONITORING THORACIC FLUID LEVELS AND CARDIO-RESPIRATORY FUNCTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+30.0%)
3y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 539 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month