Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 19/052,981

COOLING DEVICE AND FLYING OBJECT

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 13, 2025
Priority
Feb 20, 2024 — JP 2024-023502
Examiner
NGUYEN, VIET P
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
451 granted / 731 resolved
-6.3% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+30.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
751
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
§103
55.7%
+15.7% vs TC avg
§102
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
§112
22.3%
-17.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 731 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim for foreign priority based on an application filed in Japan on 2/20/2024. It is noted, however, that applicant has not filed a certified copy of the 2024-023502 application as required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 4-7, and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over CN 116085269 A to Jiang et al. in view of US 20210194313 A1 to Kanada et al. Regarding claim 1, Jiang et al. discloses a device comprising: a first reservoir portion (Fig. 1: 201) configured to store oil, the first reservoir portion being provided above a first bearing (401) that rotatably supports the shaft (4) above the rotor; a flow path portion (902) configured to guide the oil stored in the first reservoir portion (201) to the shaft (4) via the first bearing (401), and guide the oil guided to the shaft to a second bearing (402) that rotatably supports the shaft below the rotor. However, it fails to disclose a second reservoir portion provided below the second bearing and configured to store the oil guided to the second bearing; and a pump configured to send, to the first reservoir portion, the oil that has reached the second reservoir portion. Kanada et al. teaches a second reservoir portion (Fig. 3: R2) provided below the second bearing and configured to store the oil guided to the second bearing; and a pump (152) configured to send, to the first reservoir portion (R1), the oil that has reached the second reservoir portion. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the teaching of the second reservoir and pump as disclosed by Kanada et al. to the device disclosed by Jiang et al. One would have been motivated to do so to circulate cooling oil throughout the device. Regarding claim 4, Jiang et al. and Kanada et al. discloses a device including a gearbox (Kanada et al., Fig. 3: 80) is provided inside the second reservoir portion (R2). However, it fails to disclose a gearbox is provided inside the first reservoir portion. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the gearbox inside the first reservoir portion instead, since it has been held that rearranging parts of an invention involves only routine skill in the art. In re Japikse, 86 USPQ 70. One would have been motivated to do so to change the order of cooling process. Regarding claim 5, Jiang et al. discloses the shaft is provided with an inlet (Fig. 1: top of 902) through which the oil having passed through the first bearing is introduced, an outlet (bottom of 902) through which the oil introduced from the inlet is discharged, and an internal hollow part (902) communicating with the inlet and the outlet. Regarding claim 6, Jiang et al. discloses the inlet is formed in a portion of a side surface of the shaft, the portion being located below the first bearing, and the outlet is formed in a portion of the side surface of the shaft, the portion being located below the inlet (Fig. 2: bottom portion of 902 has open side surfaces). Regarding claim 7, Jiang et al. and Kanada et al. discloses a device including the inlet, outlet, and hollow part. However, it fails to disclose the inlet comprises a plurality of the inlets formed at intervals in a circumferential direction of the shaft, the outlet comprises a plurality of the outlets formed at intervals in the circumferential direction of the shaft, and the internal hollow part comprises a plurality of the internal hollow parts formed at intervals in the circumferential direction of the shaft. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use a plurality of flow paths, since it has been held that mere duplication of the essential working parts of a device involves only routine skill in the art. St. Regis Paper Co. v. Bemis Co., 193 USPQ 8. One would have been motivated to do so to improve cooling. Regarding claim 10, the combination of Jiang et al. and Kanada et al. discloses the cooling device according to claim 1: and the rotating electric machine according to claim 1 (see claim 1 above). Claims 2-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over CN 116085269 A to Jiang et al. in view of US 20210194313 A1 to Kanada et al. as applied to claim 1 above and further in view of US 20240055939 A1 to Ito et al. Regarding claims 2-3, Jiang et al. and Kanada et al. discloses a device as described above. However, it fails to disclose the limitations from claims 2-3. Ito et al. teaches: a first air vent passage (217) configured to allow communication between an inside of the first reservoir portion and an outside of the first reservoir portion is connected to the first reservoir portion. a second air vent passage (217) configured to allow communication between an inside of the second reservoir portion and an outside of the second reservoir portion is connected to the second reservoir portion. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the teaching of the air vent passages as disclosed by Ito et al. to the first and second reservoirs disclosed by Jiang et al. and Kanada et al. One would have been motivated to do so to optimize fluid flow. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 8-9 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VIET P NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-9457. The examiner can normally be reached M, T, Th, F from 12pm-8pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tulsidas C Patel can be reached at 571-272-2098. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VIET P NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 13, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12768332
WIND TURBINE POWER PLANT WITH PEAK POWER CONSUMPTION CONTROL
2y 6m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12771197
STATOR
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12753735
A SUBMERSIBLE HYDROELECTRIC GENERATOR APPARATUS AND METHOD OF OPERATING SAME
1y 8m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12732070
COLLECTION NET FOR RESTRICTING LEAKAGE CURRENT OF UNDERWATER MOTOR
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12712420
VIBRATION MOTOR HAVING THROUGH HOLE FORMED IN ROTOR
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+30.2%)
2y 4m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 731 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month