Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 31, 2026
Application No. 19/053,108

TUBELESS TIRE INSERT

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Feb 13, 2025
Priority
Feb 13, 2020 — provisional 62/976,227 +1 more
Examiner
FISCHER, JUSTIN R
Art Unit
1749
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Fox Factory Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
44%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 11m
Est. Remaining
46%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 44% of resolved cases
44%
Career Allowance Rate
732 granted / 1654 resolved
-20.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
76 currently pending
Career history
1752
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
87.6%
+47.6% vs TC avg
§102
3.4%
-36.6% vs TC avg
§112
4.4%
-35.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1654 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. 3. Claim(s) 1, 4, and 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Dubois (LU 82351, of record). As best depicted in Figure 2, Dubois teaches an insert comprising an annular body 3” and a valve or positioning system (for said annular body- not depicted), wherein a mean inner diameter of said body during mounting of the tire on a rim (Figure 2) is greater than a mean inner diameter of said body when the tire is mounted on said rim (Figure 1- reference character 3 with thickness “e” corresponds with an inflated annular body). Additionally, the valve of Dubois (and associated inflation means) is a pneumatic system “configured to provide directional biased expansion of the insert” (unclear how the claim language defines over the structure and capability of the inflation valve of Dubois). Regarding claim 4, any region of the annular body can be viewed as a “first portion” and any region of the annular body can be viewed as a “second portion”, wherein all of the portions are formed with the same material. As to claim 11, the assembly of Dubois includes rim 4. Additionally, the tire of Dubois includes first and second bead regions 22. Allowable Subject Matter 4. Claim 9 and 10 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments 5. Applicant's arguments filed February 24, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant simply states DuBois does not teach or suggest a pneumatic system configured to provide directional biased expansion of the insert. It is unclear exactly how the valve and inflation means of DuBois is not capable of or configured to provide the claimed expansion. It is emphasized that the claims as currently drafted are directed to an insert and an assembly including an insert, as opposed to a method in which biased expansion of the insert is actually carried out. Conclusion 6. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. 7. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JUSTIN R FISCHER whose telephone number is (571)272-1215. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 5:30-2:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Katelyn Smith can be reached at 571-270-5545. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Justin Fischer /JUSTIN R FISCHER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1749 May 21, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 13, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Feb 24, 2026
Response Filed
May 27, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jul 27, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 30, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12691709
A SELF-SUPPORTING TYRE FOR AUTOMOTIVE WHEELS
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12679144
HEAVY DUTY TIRE
1y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12668691
THERMOPLASTIC RESIN COMPOSITION
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12654496
Run Flat System Having a Spring Suspension
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12643349
PNEUMATIC TIRE
4y 9m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
44%
Grant Probability
46%
With Interview (+2.2%)
3y 4m (~1y 11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1654 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month