Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/053,587

METHOD AND ARRANGEMENT FOR APPLYING A COATING TO A BEARING COMPONENT

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 14, 2025
Priority
Feb 28, 2024 — DE 102024201847.3
Examiner
TALBOT, BRIAN K
Art Unit
1712
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Aktiebolaget SKF
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 8m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
699 granted / 1182 resolved
-5.9% vs TC avg
Strong +31% interview lift
Without
With
+30.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
1240
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
64.3%
+24.3% vs TC avg
§102
10.7%
-29.3% vs TC avg
§112
21.1%
-18.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1182 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 1-8, in the reply filed on 5/21/26 is acknowledged. Claims 9-11 have been withdrawn from consideration as being directed toward non-elected claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 3-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being clearly anticipated by JP-04962066. JP-04962066 teaches apparatus and method of resin coated product including a bearing part. JP-04962066 teaches a heating apparatus (14) (claimed holding apparatus) whereby a bearing (2) is made of having a resin coating (11) on the interior of a cylindrical substrate (10) (claimed applying defined amount of coating) and rotational means (3) for rotating the bearing (2) having the coating (11) on the inner surface of the cylindrical substrate (10) and heating the coating (11) while being rotated in the furnace (14) (abstract). Regarding claim 1, the rotation of the furnace would be at the claimed first speed and cure the coating 11 on the inner surface of the cylindrical substrate (10) (9th aspect of the invention). Regarding claim 3, JP-04962066 teaches drying in the heated furnace while being rotated prior to curing which would be the claimed third speed (12th aspect of the invention). Regarding claims 4-7, JP-04962066 teaches using a controller (30) and control unit (31) that controls the rotating speeds and the heating and hence would inherently teach both constant and/or variable speeds during the drying and heating steps (embodiment 1) and would also teach same/similar speeds. JP-04962066 teaches the speed of rotation is faster in the drying step than in the curing step (6th aspect of invention). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2 and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over JP-04962066 in combination with Nakashima et al. (2004/0062860). Features detailed above concerning the teachings of JP-04962066 are incorporated here. JP-04962066 fails to teach applying the coating to the bearing component while being rotated at a second speed as well as the first, second and third speeds being “selected” based upon viscosity, temperature and/or size of bearing component. Nakashima et al. (2004/0062860) teaches a method of forming coat on inner surface of bearing and apparatus for the same. Nakashima et al. (2004/0062860) teaches applying the coating material while rotating the bearing [0026],[0027]. Therefore, it would have been obvious for one skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified JP-04962066 bearing coating process to include coating the inner surface of the bearing while rotating the bearing at a speed as evidenced by Nakashima et al. (2004/0062860) with the expectation of producing a smooth coating due to the rotation aspect of the bearing during coating. Regarding claim 8, both JP-04962066 and Nakashima et al. (2004/0062860) teach heating the bearing during coating and this would affect the speeds utilized in the applying, drying and curing steps as the higher the temperatures the lower the speeds required with a balance to avoid defects in the coating layer applied. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRIAN K TALBOT whose telephone number is (571)272-1428. The examiner can normally be reached Monday -Friday 7-4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, MICHAEL CLEVELAND can be reached at 571-272-1418. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRIAN K TALBOT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1712
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 14, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750964
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A DISPLAY MODULE
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12742243
METHOD OF COATING METALLIC COMPONENT OF A ROLLING-ELEMENT BEARING OR A PLAIN BEARING
6y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12692623
METHOD OF PROCESSING SUBSTRATE, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE, RECORDING MEDIUM, AND SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12695120
LITHIUM-ION BATTERY
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12689055
ELECTRODE PLATE, ELECTRODE ASSEMBLY CONTAINING SAME, AND BATTERY
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+30.9%)
3y 3m (~1y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1182 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month