Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026
Application No. 19/053,692

DOUBLE PIPE FOR HEAT EXCHANGE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 14, 2025
Priority
Mar 29, 2023 — JP 2023-053280 +1 more
Examiner
NIEVES, NELSON J
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
SUMITOMO RIKO Company Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
608 granted / 808 resolved
+15.2% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
826
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
47.8%
+7.8% vs TC avg
§102
15.7%
-24.3% vs TC avg
§112
34.4%
-5.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 808 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 4-6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Nakamura et al. (US 20060096314), hereinafter referred to as Nakamura. Re claim 1, Nakamura teaches a double pipe for heat exchange in which an inner pipe (e.g. 162) is inserted into an outer pipe (e.g. 161) to enable heat exchange among a heat medium (e.g. ¶ 42, “a double-wall pipe 160 for carrying a refrigerant is typically used for a refrigerant cycle device 100”) flowing through an inner flow path in the inner pipe and an outer flow path between the inner pipe and the outer pipe (see Fig 11), comprising: in a straight pipe portion (see e.g. Fig 3) extending linearly in a pipe lengthwise direction so as to constitute a heat exchange portion (see e.g. Fig 3), a pipe wall of the inner pipe having a plurality of convex portions (see convex portion in Fig 7 indicated in part by 162) in a circumferential direction so as to form a concave/convex cross-sectional shape (e.g. Fig 4), and in the pipe wall of the inner pipe, an inclined pipe wall portion (see portion in Fig 7 indicated in part by 162) whose convex portion extends spirally in the pipe lengthwise direction and a turbulence-generating pipe wall portion (162d; ¶ 94, “The helical grooves 162 d of the inner pipe 162 generate a turbulent stream in the passage 160 a”) whose convex portion has a lead angle different from that of the inclined pipe wall portion being formed in series in the pipe lengthwise direction (see Fig 7). Re claim 4, Nakamura teaches the double pipe for heat exchange according to claim 1, wherein the inclined pipe wall portion and the turbulence-generating pipe wall portion in the pipe wall of the inner pipe have a constant cross-sectional shape across the entire length (see Fig 11). Re claim 5, Nakamura teaches the double pipe for heat exchange according to claim 1, wherein the convex portion of the inclined pipe wall portion extends spirally in the pipe lengthwise direction at a constant lead angle (see Fig 11). Re claim 6, Nakamura teaches the double pipe for heat exchange according to claim 1, wherein the inclined pipe wall portion is located on each side of the turbulence-generating pipe wall portion in the pipe lengthwise direction (see Fig 11). Claim(s) 1-3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Cho (US 20200248845), hereinafter referred to as Cho. Re claim 1, Cho teaches a double pipe for heat exchange in which an inner pipe (e.g. 10) is inserted into an outer pipe (e.g. 20) to enable heat exchange among a heat medium (e.g. ¶ 36, “a refrigerant”) flowing through an inner flow path in the inner pipe and an outer flow path between the inner pipe and the outer pipe (see Fig 8), comprising: in a straight pipe portion (see e.g. Fig 8) extending linearly in a pipe lengthwise direction so as to constitute a heat exchange portion (see e.g. Fig 8), a pipe wall of the inner pipe having a plurality of convex portions (see convex portion in Fig 4) in a circumferential direction so as to form a concave/convex cross-sectional shape (e.g. Fig 4), and in the pipe wall of the inner pipe, an inclined pipe wall portion (see ¶ 38) whose convex portion extends spirally in the pipe lengthwise direction and a turbulence-generating pipe wall portion (e.g. 16) whose convex portion has a lead angle different from that of the inclined pipe wall portion being formed in series in the pipe lengthwise direction (see Fig 4). Re claim 2, Cho teaches the double pipe for heat exchange according to claim 1, wherein the turbulence-generating pipe wall portion is shorter than the inclined pipe wall portion in the pipe lengthwise direction (see Fig 4). Re claim 3, Cho teaches the double pipe for heat exchange according to claim 1, wherein the turbulence-generating pipe wall portion includes a straight pipe wall portion whose convex portion extends linearly in the pipe lengthwise direction (see Fig 4). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. (see PTO-892). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NELSON NIEVES whose telephone number is (571)270-0392. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday 9am to 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Frantz Jules can be reached at 571-272-6681. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NELSON J NIEVES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3763 7/28/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 14, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12704282
HEAT PUMP WITH OVERDRIVE STAGE SETTING
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12703228
ADAPTIVE SELF-HEATING MANAGEMENT OF PROCESSORS IN AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707599
HEATSINK DEVICE
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12704291
OUTDOOR UNIT, AND REFRIGERATION CYCLE DEVICE
2y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12704287
AIR CONDITIONER
1y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+16.6%)
2y 6m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 808 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month