Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 16, 2026
Application No. 19/053,827

METHODS, APPARATUSES AND SYSTEMS FOR NETWORK PACKET DIFFERENTIATION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 14, 2025
Examiner
GILLIS, BRIAN J
Art Unit
2472
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
InterDigital Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
200 granted / 277 resolved
+14.2% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+24.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 11m
Avg Prosecution
8 currently pending
Career history
288
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
13.1%
-26.9% vs TC avg
§103
43.7%
+3.7% vs TC avg
§102
15.7%
-24.3% vs TC avg
§112
21.4%
-18.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 277 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6 and 10-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Zacharias et al (US PGPUB US20200359330). (Claim 1 discloses) a method at a wireless transmit/receive unit, WTRU, in a network, the method comprising: receiving from the network a grant for uplink transmission (Zacharias et al shows receiving a UL grant, paragraph 113).); receiving a data packet; determining at least one characteristic of the data packet (Zacharias et al shows the data is inherently received and determined parameters of the transmission are available (paragraphs 113 and 114).); determining, based on the at least one characteristic of the data packet, a value indicative of possible energy consumption associated with transfer of the data packet (Zacharias et al shows a determination is made if sufficient power is available (paragraphs 113-114).); and based on the value indicative of possible energy consumption associated with transfer of the data packet and a given energy budget value, transmitting the data packet to the network using the uplink grant or dropping the data packet (Zacharias et al shows bases on if the power is sufficient the data is transferred or dropped (paragraphs 115 and 116)). (Claim 2 discloses) the method of claim 1, further comprising: transmitting, to the network, information indicative of energy-related capabilities of the WTRU (Zacharias et al shows the UE transmits a power report (paragraph 112).); and implementing a configuration based on the transmitted information (Zacharias et al shows the transmission is configured based on the information (paragraphs 112-114)). (Claim 3 discloses) the method of claim 2, wherein the energy-related capabilities comprise at least one of energy capacity, energy consumption efficiency capability, and maximum transmission power (Zacharias et al shows the information includes maximum power (paragraph 114)). (Claim 4 discloses) the method of claim 2, wherein the configuration comprises at least one of energy consumption budget per specific time period, a mapping between modality or type of data in a packet and value indicative of possible energy consumption associated with transfer of the data packet, a mapping between value indicative of possible energy consumption associated with transfer of the data packet and configurations of protocol layers, and attributes and/or weights for attributes for a utility function (Zacharias et al shows the configuration is based on modulation and coding scheme and the power available (paragraphs 113 and 114)). (Claim 5 discloses) the method of claim 4, wherein the value indicative of possible energy consumption associated with transfer of the data packet is determined as a function of the mapping between the modality or type of data in the data packet and the value indicative of possible energy consumption associated with transfer of the data packet (Zacharias et al shows determining if able to transmit based on the MCS and available power (paragraphs 114 and 115). (Claim 6 discloses) the method of claim 1, further comprising: monitoring energy consumption (Zacharias et al shows a power control manager monitors use (paragraph 186)). Claims 10-15 are rejected per the rejections of claims 1-6 respectively. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 7-9 and 16-18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Chauvin et al (US Patent #12471027) teaches of managing exposure using uplink duty cycling. Dinan (US PGPUB US20200359336) teaches signal transmission power adjustment in a wireless device. Wang et al (US PGPUB US20190159140) teaches power control using carrier aggregation in wireless communications. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Brian J Gillis whose telephone number is (571)272-7952. The examiner can normally be reached M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicholas Jensen can be reached at 571-270-5443. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRIAN J. GILLIS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2472
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 14, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12700978
DOPPLER SHIFT COMPENSATION
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12696307
Transmission Processing Method and Apparatus, and Electronic Device
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12677277
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR AUTONOMOUS RELIABILITY ENHANCEMENTS IN MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12666245
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SESSION RESTORATION
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12587904
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SELECTING NETWORK SLICES BASED ON NETWORK SLICE CONGESTION INFORMATION
3y 10m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+24.8%)
3y 11m (~2y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 277 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month