Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/054,113

ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY MITIGATION ASSEMBLIES AND AUTOMOTIVE VEHICLE COMPONENTS INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 14, 2025
Priority
Sep 21, 2022 — CN 202222506579.1 +1 more
Examiner
NGO, HUNG V
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Laird Technologies (Shenzhen) Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
46%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
772 granted / 953 resolved
+21.0% vs TC avg
Minimal -35% lift
Without
With
+-34.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
961
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
79.0%
+39.0% vs TC avg
§102
16.5%
-23.5% vs TC avg
§112
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 953 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-7, 9-24 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Su et al (US 2022/0142022) in view of Kawaguchi et al (US 2006/0083948). Re claim 1, Su et al disclose a first electrically conductive layer (42b); first and second permalloy layers (44) [0032] along respective first and second opposite sides of the first electrically conductive layer (Fig 4a), but does not disclose an electromagnetic noise suppression layer along or adjacent the second permalloy layer. Re claim 4, wherein: the electromagnetic energy mitigation assembly comprises a third permalloy layer (44); but does not disclose electromagnetic noise suppression layer is between the second and third permalloy layers. Re claim 5, wherein: the electromagnetic energy mitigation assembly comprises a second electrically conductive layer (42c); and the second permalloy layer is along a third side of the second electrically conductive layer (Fig 4a). Re claim 6, wherein the electromagnetic energy mitigation assembly comprises a fourth permalloy layer along an opposite fourth side of the second electrically conductive layer [0023] (Fig 2). Re claim 7, wherein: the electromagnetic energy mitigation assembly comprises a third permalloy layer (44); the first electrically conductive layer is between the first and second permalloy layers (Fig 4a); the second electrically conductive layer is between the third and fourth permalloy layers [0023](Fig 2); but does not disclose the electromagnetic noise suppression layer is between the second and third permalloy layers. Re claim 9, wherein: the first and second permalloy layers comprise first and second permalloy coatings along the respective first and second opposite sides of the first electrically conductive layer [0022]; and/or the first and second permalloy layers comprise first and second permalloy platings along the respective first and second opposite sides of the first electrically conductive layer. Re claim 10, wherein the first and second permalloy layers comprise first and second nickel-iron magnetic alloy [0032] deposits along the respective first and second opposite sides of the first electrically conductive layer. Re claim 11, wherein: the first electrically conductive layer comprises a first copper foil [0025]; the first and second permalloy layers are disposed along respective first and second opposite sides of the first copper foil such that the first copper foil and the first and second permalloy layers have a combined thickness within a range from 2 micrometers to 60 micrometers (less than 75 um)[0023]; but does not disclose the electromagnetic noise suppression layer comprises an electromagnetic noise absorbing elastomer layer having a thickness from 0.03 millimeters to 1 millimeter. Re claim 12, an automotive vehicle component comprising the electromagnetic energy mitigation assembly (Fig 1). Re claim 13, wherein the electromagnetic energy mitigation assembly is configured to define or be positionable along a surface above one or more batteries (28) of an automotive vehicle [0022] (Fig 1) whereat the electromagnetic energy mitigation assembly is operable for providing electromagnetic shielding for the one or more batteries [0022]. Re claim 14, wherein the electromagnetic energy mitigation assembly is configured to be positioned relative to one or more batteries of an automotive vehicle for providing electromagnetic shielding for the one or more batteries [0022]. Re claim 15, Su et al disclose an electromagnetic energy mitigation assembly wherein the electromagnetic energy mitigation assembly comprises: a first permalloy layer (44); a second permalloy layer (44) [0032] (Fig 4a); but does not disclose an electromagnetic noise suppression layer between the first and second permalloy layers. Re claim 18, wherein: the electromagnetic energy mitigation assembly comprises a first electrically conductive layer( 42b); and the first permalloy layer is along a side of the first electrically conductive layer (Fig 4a). Re claim 19, wherein the electromagnetic energy mitigation assembly comprises a third permalloy layer (44) along an opposite side of the first electrically conductive layer (Fig 4a). Re claim 20, wherein: the electromagnetic energy mitigation assembly comprises a second electrically conductive layer(42c); and the second permalloy layer is along a side of the second electrically conductive layer (Fig 4a). Re claim 21, wherein the electromagnetic energy mitigation assembly comprises a fourth permalloy layer along an opposite side of the second electrically conductive layer (Fig 2). Re claim 22. An automotive vehicle component comprising the electromagnetic energy mitigation assembly (Fig 1). Re claim 23, wherein the electromagnetic energy mitigation assembly is configured to define or be positionable along a surface above one or more batteries (28) of an automotive vehicle [0022] (Fig 1) whereat the electromagnetic energy mitigation assembly is operable for providing electromagnetic shielding for the one or more batteries [0022]. Re claim 24, wherein the electromagnetic energy mitigation assembly is configured to be positioned relative to one or more batteries of an automotive vehicle for providing electromagnetic shielding for the one or more batteries [0022]. The teaching as discussed above does not disclose wherein the electromagnetic noise suppression layer comprises an electromagnetic noise absorbing elastomer layer (re claims 2, 16), wherein the electromagnetic noise suppression layer is softer than the first electrically conductive layer and the first and second permalloy layers (re claim 3), wherein the electromagnetic noise suppression layer is softer than the first and second permalloy layers (re claim 17). Kawaguchi et al teach the use of an electromagnetic noise suppression layer (30) comprises an electromagnetic noise absorbing elastomer layer (13) [0174], the electromagnetic noise absorbing elastomer layer having a thickness from 0.03 millimeters to 1 millimeter (total thickness) [0194], the suppression layer is flexible [0173]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to include the noise suppression layer with the structure of Su et al for suppressing noise from a vehicle. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 8 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Communication Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HUNG V NGO whose telephone number is (571)272-1979. The examiner can normally be reached 9-5:30 M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Imani Hayman can be reached at (571) 270-5528. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HUNG V NGO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2841
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 14, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684749
MODULE
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684748
SHELTER WITH ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERFERENCE (EMI) PROTECTION AND COMPONENTS FOR SAME
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677715
APPARATUS HAVING SURFACE MOUNT PACKAGES HAVING CO-PACKED FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTORS
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12672767
SHIELDING DEVICE, AND MAGNETIC CONTROL CAPSULE ENDOSCOPE SYSTEM
1y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12672227
WIRING CIRCUIT BOARD AND METHOD OF PRODUCING THE WIRING CIRCUIT BOARD
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
46%
With Interview (-34.9%)
2y 2m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 953 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month