Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/055,226

SYSTEM AND METHOD OF A MOBILE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Feb 17, 2025
Examiner
AMAYA, CARLOS DAVID
Art Unit
2836
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Eaton Intelligent Power Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
889 granted / 1061 resolved
+15.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1085
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
39.1%
-0.9% vs TC avg
§102
40.9%
+0.9% vs TC avg
§112
11.5%
-28.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1061 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites “heavy copper” and “lower copper”, with renders the claim indefinite as it is not clear from the claims how “heavy” the heavy copper is or how “lower” the lower copper is. Claims 2-20 are also rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph for indirectly including the above noted deficiencies. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhou et al. (US 2022/0192002) in view of Beihoff et al. (US 2006/0092611). With respect to claim 1, Zhou discloses a system, comprising: a DC-to-DC converter (paragraph 0044, 0075 discloses a converter type), wherein the DC-to-DC converter comprises: a printed circuit board (PCB) (PCB 110), comprising a plurality of layers including inner copper layers and outer copper layers (figure 2 discloses a plurality of conductive/copper layers 140, paragraph 0026), wherein the inner copper layers are heavy copper and the outer copper layers are a lower copper than the inner copper layers (figure 4 discloses that layers 112 and layer 22 of board assembly 400 are different) Zhou, however, does not disclose expressly a plurality of ribbon cable connector fingers protruding from a side of the PCB. Benioff discloses in paragraphs 0094, and figure 27 discloses ribbons or braids for making connection for an electrical power converter. It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claim invention, to have modify Zhou and include the ribbon contacts of Benioff, for the purpose of providing stress relief when making the connections, for example (paragraph 0094). With respect to claim 2, Zhou in view of Benioff disclose the system of claim 1; except for, wherein a cross section of the PCB is over 50% copper. Zhou discloses that the conductive layers 140 are made of copper, thus it would have been obvious to have made the copper layers and the PCB over 50% copper, since it has been held that where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, discovering the optimum or workable ranges involves only routine skill in the art. In re Aller, 105 USPQ 233. Claim(s) 7-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhou et al. (US 2022/0192002) in view of Beihoff et al. (US 2006/0092611) in further view of Flett et al. (US 2013/0187453). With respect to claims 7, 8, Zhou in view of Benioff disclose the system of claim 1; except for, wherein a ribbon cable connection finger of the plurality of ribbon cable connector fingers comprises a ferrite choke slipped over the finger, wherein the ferrite choke comprises surface mount caps. Flett discloses a battery charger and motor driver circuit assembly comprising a ribbon cable and ferrite bead to clamp around the ribbon cable, paragraph 0038, figure 5. It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claim invention, to have modify Zhou and Beihoff and include the ferrite choke/bead of Flett, for the purpose of providing a filter subassembly, for example. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-6, 9-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims once the above rejection with respect to 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph is fixed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CARLOS AMAYA whose telephone number is (571)272-8941. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:00AM-4:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Rexford Barnie can be reached at (571) 272-7492. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CARLOS AMAYA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2836
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 17, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603529
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PERFORMING WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION ON BASIS OF FOREIGN MATERIAL DETECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597780
SEMI-AUTONOMOUS ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592566
DIRECT CURRENT CIRCUIT BREAKER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592583
REMOTE SENSING AND CONTROL AT THE POINT OF COMMON COUPLING IN AN ELECTRICAL GRID
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12576800
ROBUST HIGH VOLTAGE CABLE ROUTING/MOUNTING COUPLING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+13.5%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1061 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month