Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/055,504

LAMINATE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 18, 2025
Priority
Sep 30, 2022 — JP 2022-157310 +1 more
Examiner
AHMED, SHEEBA
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Fujifilm Holdings Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
914 granted / 1133 resolved
+20.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
1172
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
35.1%
-4.9% vs TC avg
§102
34.1%
-5.9% vs TC avg
§112
20.3%
-19.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1133 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 2. Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hunrath (US 2009/0151989 A1) in view of Murata et al. (US 2020/0325329 A1). Hunrath discloses rigid printed circuit boards (PCBs) and methods for manufacturing the same comprising strain resistant layers. Printed circuit boards (PCB) comprise one or more layers of electrically conductive material such as copper and one or more electrically insulating layers such as dielectrics. In some embodiments, a rigid circuit board comprises a surface conductive layer engaging a strain resistant cap layer. In another embodiment, a component for manufacturing printed circuit boards such as rigid printed circuit boards comprises a surface copper layer (equivalent to the copper layer of the claimed invention) and a strain resistant layer (equivalent to the polymer layer of the claimed invention). Strain resistant layers comprise a broadly defined array of "strain resistant materials," including, without limitation, thermosetting and/or thermoplastic plastics, such as, for example, polyimide, polyester, fluorinated hydrocarbon, polymers, polyacrylate, liquid crystal polymer (meeting the limitations of claim 2), synthetic fibers, aramids, fluorocarbons, etc. Strain resistant layers can also comprise a mixture of one or more of the thermosetting and/or thermoplastic plastic materials or a mixture of one or more of the plastic materials with other materials (e.g., fillers, hardeners, etc.). (See Abstract and paragraphs 0005, 0011, 0032). Hunrath does not teach the claimed polyacrylates. Murata et al. disclose a polyarylate resin which is excellent in heat-resisting properties, abrasion-resisting properties, solubility properties in non-halogenated organic solvents, a water vapor-barrier property, mechanical properties, liquid sag-resisting properties and deformation-resisting properties (such as adhesive properties). The polyarylate resin is used to form a film and a laminate. The polyarylate resin comprising a dihydric phenol residue shown in general formula (1) (equivalent to the structure 1-A of claim 1 and structure 1-Aa of claims 4, 6, and 7 and meeting the limitations of claim 3) wherein X represents a linear or branched bivalent hydrocarbon group having 4 to 8 carbon atoms, wherein R1 and R2 each independently represent a monovalent hydrocarbon group having 1 to 6 carbon atoms, which may be substituted with one or more halogen atoms, or a halogen atom, and p and q independently represent an integer of 0 to 4. It is preferable that a film is obtained by dissolving the polyarylate resin in an organic solvent, applying the solution on the substrate, drying the coated substrate, and peeling a resin layer. Examples of the substrate include a PET film, a polyimide film, a glass plate, and a stainless plate. The polyarylate resin as well as a film and a laminate obtained can be suitably used in the electric and electronic material fields, as a substrate film of a liquid crystal display, a film condenser, illumination, a solar battery, a printed circuit etc. (See Abstract and paragraphs 0001, 0017, 0030, 0062, 0064, and 0068). Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to use the polyacrylate taught by Murata et al. in the strain resistant layer taught by Hunrath given that Murata et al. disclose a polyarylate resin that can be suitably used in the printed circuits and is excellent in heat-resisting properties, abrasion-resisting properties, a water vapor-barrier property, mechanical properties, liquid sag-resisting properties and deformation-resisting properties. Conclusion 3. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHEEBA AHMED whose telephone number is (571)272-1504. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 7am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, CALLIE SHOSHO can be reached at 571-272-1123. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHEEBA AHMED/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1787
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 18, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747360
ENERGY CURABLE COMPOSITION AND METHOD OF USING THE SAME
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12742059
CURABLE FILM COMPOSITION, CURABLE FILM, AND CURED PRODUCT THEREOF
1y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12735842
METHOD FOR PREPARING MULTIFUNCTIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL FRIENDLY COATING FOR WATERPROOF AND OIL-PROOF FOOD PACKAGING PAPERS BY ONE STEP METHOD AND APPLICATION THEREOF
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735541
BIAXIALLY ORIENTED POLYESTER FILM
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735569
RESIN COMPOSITION, MOLDED BODY, AND FILM
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+14.4%)
2y 10m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1133 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month